Posted on 12/23/2021 10:07:18 AM PST by Qiviut
How good is the FDA at EUA approval for COVID drugs? Well, so far, to be honest, pretty shitty.
The first three Covid drugs approved under EUA were Remdesivir, Baricitinib, and Tofacitinib. All were EUA approved for inpatient use (in hospital) only, demonstrate dismal effectiveness and are replete with black box warnings and side effects such as organ failure, blood clots, serious infections and malignancy.
PAXLOVID
PAXLOVID was recently approved by the FDA without any external meetings or disclosure. There was no opportunity for public input. Essentially all done behind closed doors.
Dr. Ryan Cole on the drug’s mechanism of action after infection explains, the Covid virus enters the cell and commandeers the cell forcing it to produce proteins. Protease enzymes must be present for the virus to successfully complete the cycle before taking the cell over. PAXLOVID or any drug classified as a ‘Protease Inhibitor’ will inhibit or decrease the Protease enzyme interfering with the virus. Ivermectin is the most successful and proven protease inhibitor in production. Just as with Paxlovid, ivermectin decreases the protease enzyme but...the benefits of ivermectin in Covid treatment are obvious and not present in paxlovid. Additional actions of ivermectin include anti-coagulant action and anti-inflammatory actions, both observed in Covid infections.
PAXLOVID requires combination with an HIV/AIDS drug, Ritonavir, preventing the breakdown of the PAXLOVID so it may inhibit or decrease the enzyme interrupting the viral life cycle. Dr. Cole reports Ritonavir also has its own black box warning and side effects include life-threatening liver, pancreas and heart issues.
According to Pfizer’s press release, PAXLOVID reduces hospitalization/death by 89%. So in the treatment group we had 5 of 697 hospitalized with no deaths compared to 44/682 hospitalized with 9 subsequent deaths.
How does that compare with the Fareed and Tyson protocol? Well, Fareed and Tyson had 10 times as many patients taking the drug combo and yet they had fewer hospitalizations (4) and the same number of deaths (0).
So you’re way better off with the Fareed and Tyson protocol.
Molnupiravir
First, the efficacy when it works is poor, only 50%. There were two groups in the randomized trials and in the second group, the people who got the drug ended up worse. And then there is the problem of causing cancer.
Bottom line
Avoid these drugs.
Early treatments using repurposed drugs have a track record that is safer and more effective than either of two drugs that the FDA likes.
But thanks to the NIH, you’ll never hear about early treatment protocols unless you live in Florida.
BFLR
Boy, talk about typos ... sorry.
*as* the government’s COVID programs
FCA = FDA
The “few” docs now beginning to talk about treatment are not the ones that have been DOING early treatment and leading the research & providing treatment protocols that have saved 100’s of thousands of lives (Cole, Kory, Tyson, McCullough, Malone, et al). The docs being allowed on TV to talk about treatment are a different bunch.
Who is the sci-fi putz who dreams up these preposterous drug names?
Some marketing department types most likely.
From “Serenity” (movie based on Firefly):
It’s the Pax. The G-23 Paxilon Hydrochlorate that we added to the air processors. It was supposed to calm the population, weed out aggression. Well, it works. The people here stopped fighting. And then they stopped everything else. They stopped going to work, they stopped breeding, talking, eating. There’s 30 million people here, and they all just let themselves die.
Beginning of epic fail to replace two relatively safe, and according to all available data, effective medications that suffer from being “too inexpensive”, a major disadvantage for the Big Pharma cartel.
Even aspirin shows some effective promise for therapeutic purposes.
“Emergency use authorization” allows the proposed drugs to be used on the lab rats trapped in the COVID-19 Wuhan virus vortex.
Josef Mengele would be so in admiration of the planned trials on a captive patient demographic.
Who is the sci-fi putz who dreams up these preposterous drug names?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You asked .... :-)
How Do Drugs Get Named?
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/how-do-drugs-get-named/2019-08
“..PAXLOVID and Molnupiravir...”
Not very “euphonious”!
They’ll do anything to avoid selling the dirt cheap and very effective HCQ-Z or Ivermectin. Got to bring in those big bucks!
Steve Kirsch a.k.a Debbie Downer - according to him vaccines don’t work, and on top of that they are going to cause herpes and low sperm count. And the therapeutics cause cancer, stroke, flatulence, gingivitis, flat feet, irritable bowel syndrome, toe fungus, acne...
You’re welcome :) (https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4023616/posts?page=19#19)
Thanks for posting.
Pinging a few.
Steve Kirsch didn’t say that.
You said that. 🙂
this is a ridiculously simplistic newsletter to claim that “Ivermectin is the most successful and proven protease inhibitor in production” ... there are tens of thousands of DIFFERENT proteases, and each one requires a different inhibitor ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protease
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protease_inhibitor_(pharmacology)
Ivermectin may very well inhibit a protease and perhaps even one that is involved with covid but there’s no such thing as a universal protease inhibitor ... but when i see nonsense like the above in an article i give zero credibility to the rest ...
and besides it’s been proven that Ivermectin’s primary therapeutic action in regards to covid is the prevention of the covid virus from entering the cells in the first place by blocking the ACE-docking portion of the spike protein, NOT as a protease inhibitor:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871846/
I’d stick with ivermectin before either one of those. An Israeli company is marketing an herbal 3CL protease inhibitor that looks interesting as well, though it’s cheaper to buy the herbs elsewhere.
ALTERNATIVE SAFE WAYS TO KEEP YOUR RESISTANCE UP & FIGHT COVID -19. AS WELL AS “VARIATIONS” AND A HOST OF OTHER INFECTIONS INCLUDING THE FLU.
THIS REGIME WILL “NOT” PREVENT YOU FROM CATCHING THIS CRAZY VIRUS BUT IF YOU DO, IT WILL HELP TO SHAKE IT OFF FAIRLY QUICK, FOR SOME PEOPLE IT WORKS SO WELL THEY DON’T EVEN FEEL THEY GOT IT. BESIDES IT WILL ALSO WORK AGAINST OTHER RELATED VIRUSES; NOT ONLY THAT, BUT WILL BENEFITS YOUR HEALTH AS WELL, IF YOU CATCH THIS VIRUS OR NOT. EITHER WAY YOU WIN. ALONG WITH IT YOU WILL HAVE ACQUIRED NATURAL IMMUNITY WITHOUT ANY SHORT OR LONG TERM ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS.
There are other ways and means to enhance your resistance against viruses including that by now infamous covid-19 virus aside from taking any of these “Quick” developed vaccines utilizing a messenger RNA. So far science has not evolved far enough yet to be certain how the human body will react many month or years down the road once we start tinkering around with our immune system and how our bodies will react should we encounter mutated strains of similar viruses.
Below is a list of vitamins as well as nutrients SUGGESTED BY A PHYSICIAN to enhance your resistance, they are harmless and even beneficial to your body unless someone goes crazy and over doing it. Even so they will NOT protect you from getting any specific viruses; neither will any of those new “QUICK” developed vaccines. But not only will they make you more resistant but also help you to overcome the effects of such a virus more quickly, should you have bad luck getting it. And once you are over it, your natural immune system will take over and protect you considerably better than any vaccination, this according to a statement by Merck. The CATCH is to have these vitamins/nutrients in your system BEFORE you think you have caught this virus, as time is of essence so your system starts fighting the virus BEFORE it gets a chance to do any damage.
A suggestion to the wise, take some time and read up on each of these suggested components which is freely available on the internet.
Vitamin D — Vitamin D supplements are readily available and one of the least expensive supplements on the market. All things considered, vitamin D optimization is likely the easiest and most beneficial strategy that anyone can do to minimize their risk of COVID-19 and other infections, and can strengthen your immune system in a matter of a few weeks.
N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) — NAC is a precursor to reduced glutathione, which appears to play a crucial role in COVID-19. According to one literature analysis,7 glutathione deficiency may actually be associated with COVID-19 severity, leading the author to conclude that NAC may be useful both for its prevention and treatment. For best results should always be taken with two to three times the amount of vitamin C. DO NOT GET IT MIXED UP WITH ACETYL L-CARNITINE
Zinc — Zinc plays a very important role in your immune system’s ability to ward off viral infections.
Like vitamin D, zinc helps regulate your immune function8 — and a combination of zinc with a zinc ionophore, like hydroxychloroquine or quercetin, was in 2010 shown to inhibit SARS coronavirus in vitro. In cell culture, it also blocked viral replication within minutes.9 Importantly, zinc deficiency has been shown to impair immune function.
Melatonin — Boosts immune function in a variety of ways and helps quell inflammation. Melatonin may also prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection by recharging glutathione11 and enhancing vitamin D synthesis, among other things.
Vitamin C — A number of studies have shown vitamin C can be very helpful in the treatment of viral illnesses, sepsis and ARDS,12 all of which are applicable to COVID-19. Its basic properties include anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, antithrombotic and antiviral activities. At high doses, it actually acts as an antiviral drug, actively inactivating viruses. Vitamin C also works synergistically with quercetin.
Quercetin — Quercetin is the most abundant dietary flavonoid, found enriched in cranberry, onions, blueberry, apples, and tea. As a polyphenol compound, it is ALSO considered a potent iron chelator. A powerful immune booster and broad-spectrum antiviral, quercetin was initially found to provide broad-spectrum protection against SARS coronavirus in the aftermath of the 2003 SARS epidemic,14,15,16 and evidence suggests it may be useful for the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 as well. Not only that but quercetin also acts as an ionophore for zinc similar to hydroxychloroquine, in a matter of speaking it will unlock the cells to let the zinc in where it can attack the virus . It is also a good pain killer and better for the human body than Aspirin, what helps to subdue arthritis pain. I is good for sinus infection, in other words if you happen to have a runny nose. Past studies have also shown that quercetin showed potent ability against some viruses, such as enterovirus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV).
B vitamins — B vitamins can also influence several COVID-19-specific disease processes, including17 viral replication and invasion, cytokine storm induction, adaptive immunity and hypercoagulability.
LYSINE
When lysine blocks enzymes it inhibits the spread of the virus in the body by limiting the effect of weakening this connective tissue. An adult may take 2-3000 mg per day of lysine while trying to beat a virus.
SUGGESTED DOSAGE
All components as suggested are individually obtained and freely available and if used with some common sense are not harmful and if anything beneficial to your health. However it is a good idea and highly recommended to read up on each component, as there is plenty of information available on the internet. You may be surprised to find out and learn about the many benefits they provide to your health.
Here is a suggested approximate dosage for each.
Vitamin D 1500 IU
Malatonine 3mg to 6mg suggested about one hour before you go to sleep.
QUERCETIN 500 mg to 1000 mg
NAC 500 mg to 1000 mg (N-Acetyl-Cysteine)
Zinc 50 mg
Vitamin C 1500 mg or MORE !! but always should be to two three times as much as NAC
LYSINE
1500 mg to 3000mg
Vitamin B complex
So far whoever has been taking this regime of supplements and may have had a brush with this virus, shook it off fairly easily and quickly and the most important thing was that in the process such a person also acquired natural immunity. Not only that but at the same time this regime also helps to ease the effects of the regular flu.
Some of user’s comments:
Latest J&J Vaccine Info: Alex Berenson
4/15/2021, 10:49:29 AM • 27 of 28
Chauncey Gardiner to saintgermaine
Good post.
I have been on that same vitamin regimen since April 2020 along with approx 25 friends/family members. All of us socially active...restaurants, church, weddings, travel, etc. In other words, we’ve not changed our lives the past year. Not a one of us has tested positive and not a one has even had a cold. I’ve added hydroxychloroquine 200mg each Sunday starting about 6 mos ago.
Mississippi man partially paralyzed, unable to talk after J&J vaccine
4/16/2021, 6:48:45 PM • 37 of 39
upchuck to saintgermaine
Excellent regimen. Pretty much what I’ve been doing. I have been taking 5000 iu of Vit D3 per day for years and have never been sick (thank you Lord). With the China Virus, I upped it to 10,000 iu. I think zinc and quercetin are the most important.
10,570 DEAD 405,259 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines”
5/21/2021, 7:41:23 AM • 52 of 52
jimjohn to saintgermaine
Been on similar regimens since August of 2020. Attended parties public events even a professional football game. Oh, and I fall in the high-risk category. Also posted recently about hearing friends and associates who’ve taken the jab complain about the after effects. Also note that my position would not recommend that I take this experimental vaccine.
Trump Girl Kit Cat to saintgermaine
My Doc put myself and EVERY patient he had on Quercetin, C, D3, Zinc, and NAC from day one he has not had ONE SINGLE patient catch this virus, I also put my 92 year old mom on it I NEVER miss a day!! My mom had a small stroke about 4 months ago neither of us vaccinated I had to take her to emergency and was worried because hospitals are an absolute petrie dish of germs we both spent 4 days in the hospital no masks in room AND we both came home just fine this supplement regimen works!!!
Dr. Tess Lawrie who was trying to independently analyze the results of various studies focused on the treatment of COVID-19 Ivermectin (and was showing excellent results in overall reductions in hospitalization rates and death rates in the studies she was reviewing as a group in an effort to get Ivermectin approved for treatment) called Dr. Hill to ask him about the "change" in the summary.
I don't see how Dr. Lawrie would falsify this transcript, so I accept it at face value. In reading this, it is chilling and disheartening, and leaves no doubt that he was not only strong armed to change his summary...he did so for financial gain. The article may be read here at Ivermectin and the Price of Life
Hill's parent institution, the University of Liverpool, had just received a 40 million dollar donation from UNITAID (Unitaid’s main donors are France, the United Kingdom, Norway, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Brazil, Spain, the Republic of Korea, and Chile) four days before Hill's Ivermectin paper was published, and Dr. Hill's conclusion was changed 180 degrees from his position just a few weeks earlier. Andrew Hill admitted that his sponsors (UNITAID) pressured him to alter his conclusion.
DR. ANDREW HILL: I think I'm in a very sensitive position here.
DR. TESS LAWRIE: Lots of people are in sensitive positions; they're in hospital, in ICUs dying, and they need this medicine. This is what I don't get, you know, because you're not a clinician. You're not seeing people dying every day. And this medicine prevents deaths by 80%. So 80 percent of those people who are dying today don't need to die because there's Ivermectin.
DR. ANDREW HILL: The NIH would not agree to recommend IVM.
DR. TESS LAWRIE: Yeah, because the NIH is owned by the vaccine lobby...This is bad research. So at this point, I am really, really worried about you.
DR. ANDREW HILL: Okay. Yeah. I mean, it's a difficult situation.
DR. TESS LAWRIE: No, you might be in a difficult situation. I'm not because I have no paymaster. I can tell the truth...How can you deliberately try and mess up...you know? So, how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily - up to you? What is the timeline you've allowed for this, then?
DR. ANDREW HILL: Well, I think...I think that it goes to WHO and the NIH, and the FDA, and the EMEA. And they've got to decide when they think enough is enough.
DR. TESS LAWRIE: You'd rather...risk loads of people's lives. Do you know if you and I stood together on this, we could present a united front and we could get this thing. We could make it happen. We could save lives; we could prevent people from getting infected. We could prevent the elderly from dying...I'm a doctor, and I'm going to save as many lives as I can. And I'm going to do that through getting the message [out] on Ivermectin...Okay. Unfortunately, your work is going to impair that, and you seem to be able to bear the burden of many, many deaths, which I cannot do. So who is it in UNITAID, then? Who is giving you opinions on your evidence?
DR. ANDREW HILL: It’s just the people there. I don't...
DR. TESS LAWRIE: Could you please give me a name of someone in UNITAID I could speak to, so that I can share my evidence and hope to try and persuade them to understand it?
DR. ANDREW HILL: Oh, I'll have to think about who to, to offer you with a name...But I mean this is very difficult because I'm, you know, I've got this role where I'm supposed to produce this paper and we're in a very difficult, delicate balance...Yeah, it’s a very strong lobby...
DR. TESS LAWRIE: So, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for?
DR. ANDREW HILL: From my side. Okay...I think end of February, we will be there in six weeks.
DR. TESS LAWRIE: How many people die every day?
DR. ANDREW HILL: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, 15,000 people a day.
DR. TESS LAWRIE: Fifteen thousand people a day times six weeks...Because at this rate, all other countries are getting Ivermectin except the UK and the USA, because the UK and the USA and Europe are owned by the vaccine lobby.
DR. ANDREW HILL: My goal is to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to get it approved so that it reaches the maximum...
DR. TESS LAWRIE: You're not doing everything you can, because everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you, 'I can see this prevents deaths. So I'm not going to support this conclusion anymore, and I'm going to tell the truth. Well, you're not going to get it approved the way you've written that conclusion. You've actually shot yourself in the foot, and you've shot us all in the foot. All of...everybody trying to do something good. You have actually completely destroyed it...I don't know how you sleep at night, honestly.
I do not think I have ever read a more damning transcript of an interview on this type of subject. This man, Dr. Andrew Hill, literally and cravenly sold his soul for the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.
I am ashamed to live in a Western society in which this is possible.
I highly recommend the linked article. If you are curious, the value of a human life to Dr. Hill was about 20 dollars and 20 cents per life, for the amount of $40 million given to the University of Liverpool by UNITAID.
Kirsch favorably refers to the “Fareed & Tyson protocol” as an alternative to the Pfizer pill, but never mentions what the Fareed & Tyson protocol is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.