Posted on 12/13/2021 6:28:44 PM PST by conservative98
Last week, the World Tribune published an article revealing information that indicates the WHO likely knew ivermectin was effective for months, but blocked its use, all for Big Pharma. Dr. Andrew Hill, a senior visiting research fellow in pharmacology at Liverpool University, adviser to the Gates Foundation, and researcher for the WHO, was tasked with conducting an ivermectin trial for the WHO. Based on his preliminary findings, Hill testified enthusiastically about the use of ivermectin before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel on Jan. 6, 2021. But then he suddenly changed course and published a study dinging the drug’s efficacy against COVID.
According to the Tribune, Dr. Tess Lawrie, director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, who was also involved in the ivermectin research, recorded a Zoom call she had with Hill and revealed a remarkable exchange between the two of them.
In a remarkable exchange, Hill admitted his manipulated study would likely delay the uptake of ivermectin in the UK and United States, but said he hoped his doing so would only set the lifesaving drug’s acceptance back by about “six weeks,” after which he was willing to give his support for its use. […]
Four days before publication, Hill’s sponsor Unitaid gave the University of Liverpool, Hill’s employer $40 million. Unitaid, it turns out, was also an author of the conclusions of Hill’s study.
In the call, Lawrie berated Hill’s study as “flawed,” “rushed,” “not properly put together,” and “bad research . . . bad research,” which Hill appears not to have denied.
Instead, when pressed he admitted his sponsor, Unitaid, was an unacknowledged author of conclusions.
“Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah,” he told Lawrie.
The exact exchange on the Zoom call, according to the Tribune, went as follows:
Lawrie: I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.
Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.
Hundreds of thousands are dead because of a concerted effort to fight early treatment. They are being this vicious precisely because it works so well https://t.co/xCcRNYJZyw— Daniel Horowitz (@RMConservative) December 14, 2021
Daniel Horowitz suspended by The Twittsewer in 3..2..1..
Billionaires don’t need peasant vermin on their pleasure planet.
American doctors have blood on their hands.
bookmark
L8r
Everyone should remember that President Trump worked hard to get prescription prices lowered. Pharma obviously wanted to use COVID to recoup those losses and rake in a whole lot more, while beating up on Trump for having the gall to mess with them.
Just following the orders of their bosses and big pharma contracts.
They just peel off the latex gloves and head for the country club.
just the corporate quacks
I would guess that Dr. Andrew Hill, as an “adviser” to the Gate Foundation is at worst dead now and at best..unemployed for the rest of his life ...
A formidable array of domestic and international enemy combatants
That is a nauseating statement from a 'scientist'. Just nauseating.
If true criminal proceedings begin immediately.
So true. You need to make sure of your own treatment. I just made my own HCQ over the weekend and we are taking it daily along with a gazillion supplements.
Ping
IBT $hot $hills.
“Evidence-based” = “bribe-based”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.