Posted on 12/13/2021 2:03:17 AM PST by Enlightened1
First bolus of Pfizer vax data from our FOIA request yields alarming adverse event findings: "Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021 [less than three months], total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events.
https://twitter.com/akheriaty/status/1469832293007069184
Pfizer Vaccine data released on adverse events after FOIA request.
Documents released by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reveal that drugmaker Pfizer recorded nearly 160,000 adverse reactions to its Covid-19 vaccine in the initial months of its rollout.
The documents were obtained by a group of doctors, professors, and journalists calling themselves Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, who filed a (FOIA) request with the FDA for their release.
The first tranche of documents reveal that, as of February 2021, when Pfizer’s shot was being rolled out, the drugmaker had compiled more than 42,000 case reports detailing nearly 160,000 adverse reactions to the jab.
These reactions ranged from the mild to the severe, and 1,223 were fatal. The majority of these case reports involved people aged between 31 and 50 in the United States.
More than 25,000 nervous system disorders were reported, along with 17,000 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders and 14,000 gastrointestinal disorders. A range of different autoimmune conditions were reported, along with some peculiar maladies, including 270 “spontaneous abortions,” and incidences of herpes, epilepsy, heart failure and strokes, among thousands of others.
It's said in nearly every VAERS-related article posted here. If you're genuinely unaware I can find you many examples.
Although you weren't willing to state anything explicitly you came close yourself when you responded to my statement:
"— “I don't think any of these deaths were attributed to the vaccine.”
with:
Attributed? They attribute 1223 “case outcomes” as “fatal.”
Perhaps you can explain what else you meant in the context of my statement?
If it's not true, I agree.
The problem is I've seen no evidence that it's true, and I've seen evidence from the CDC's statements that it isn't true.
If there's no evidence it's true, an alternative statement supported by the evidence is the opposite of misinformation.
I got that shot...I’d just mustered out after 8 years. It gave me something my doctor had to explain to me called pleurisy and he said the shot caused it. Fluid in the lining between my lungs and chest wall. I didn’t ‘feel right’ for at least a decade. That was the last time I ever took a damned flu shot.
It is evident that you accept the “evidence from the CDC’s statements,” and so put your trust in them, which would include trust in Fauci, Collins, Walensky and the current administration in charge for almost a year now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.