Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England since August

dailyexpose.uk ^ | DECEMBER 11, 2021 | THE EXPOSÉ

[brookwood]

Why does the report state on page 6
“Affer 2 doses, observed vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease with the Delta variant reaches approximately 65 to 70% with AstraZeneca Vaxzevria and 80 to 95% with Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty and Moderna
Spikevax”

Ransomnote - are we looking at the same report? Why does the report say Pfizer is 80 to 95 percent effective? HMMMM? I’m waiting.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1039677/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_49.pdf

[LibertarianLiz]

Okay, when are we going to be allowed to point out that the "vaccines" (they are not vaccines) DON'T WORK!

This is ridiculous. If you are vaccinated: you can still get COVID, you can transmit COVID, you can be hospitalized with COVID. The only benefit seems to be that you will not get a deadly version of the virus. That's it.

And, considering how many bad reactions to the "vaccine" that we are seeing (but, media refuses to look into -- exactly what is their job?), we need to pull this damn thing back and actually do some long term studies.

I started having my doubts about this "vaccine" when it was the ONLY solution that they would accept. Natural immunity -- nope. Theraputics -- nope. So, I asked myself, Why? Why, are they so adamant? Why is it the shot, or nothing? Why?

Time for some questions to be asked of Doctor Mengele (oops, sorry) Fauci. Perhaps something like a "cage fight". Fauci in a cage; and, Rand Paul questioning him until we get some real answers about this.

[Openurmind]

Absolutely... It is right in our faces with a historical pattern.

[LibertarianLiz]

Killing people?

Population control.

[ProfessorGoldiloxx]

I am not taking ANY of these experimental shots. Real vaccines take 10 years on average to develop, not 9 months. NOBODY is vaccinated for covid because these fetal tissue and (42 trillion per dose) spike protein shots are NOT real actual vaccines. Science!
P.S. And the so-called ‘boosters’ are just full strength regular covid shots.

[A Formerly Proud Canadian]

My landlord told me yesterday, that he is hoping to get his 2nd BOOSTER soon (in other words, 4 ‘clot shots’)! He also is pushing his son and daughter-in-law to get all seven kids vaxxed. That family is not interested in the slightest, in getting the ‘clot shots’. They don’t trust the medico/political/MSM establishment at all. I say, “Good on them!” The oldest of their kids is 24 or so, and the youngest is 4.

Normally, my LL is a reasonably intelligent man, though a bit of a hypochondriac. His wife got the two shots and PCR test only because it was required, to be able to fly to their shack in Panama. He’s still here in the PRC (Politically Repressive Canada), planning on flying to Panama as soon as he can.

[Glad2bnuts]

Does anyone know how to find something similar for those vaccinate for Measles, Mumps Rubella? How about Chicken Pox, and shingles? How about for the seasonal Flu? TB? Hepatitis B? Smallpox?

The reason I ask is, someone will come on here and say “OF COURSE there are more vaxxed sick, hospitalized and dying. There are more of them. Which is an idiotic response. Either the treatments work, or they do not. I can tell you with certainty, you are a fool for taking the shot. You are destroying the country, the freedom for all people, and participating in a mass “gaslighting” event to end all.

[A Formerly Proud Canadian]

Aw, c’mon, man! All those deaths among the vaxxed are just COINCIDENCES! YOU NEED YOUR CURRENT THREE OR FOUR SHOTS to live!

-—The medico/political/MSM line

[DoodleBob]

My good FRiend, this isn't on you...but there is one massive problem with this study.

The inclusion of the people 18 and under.

I cracked open the most recent report, and focused on the case and fatality Tables.

In the aggregate, the analysis is sound.

But the 18 and under crowd account for a massive number of cases but only about four fatalities.

If you strip away the youngsters' numbers, the case fatality rates by age and in total favor those who've accepted shots.

I am NOT saying the shots are a long-run positive thing, or that there isn't a whole lot of data massaging etc. happening.

But this kind of fun-with-numbers is what I expect from Fauci.

[Openurmind]

Birth control, women’s lib to reduce willingness to breed, abortion, environmental/climate agenda to reduce food availability and return us to the stone age, promoting same sex partnerships because they can’t breed, outlawing self defense while legalizing crime, legalizing deadly drugs, pushing drugs on the mentally ill so they go crazy and kill other humans in mass, creating oppression and in turn depression and suicide, Etc. Both the virus and the jab are just another fork of the long effort towards the same goal of culling human numbers.

[Openurmind]

Please read #30 and I think you will see the very real historical connections in the agenda. When you back up and get a wider perspective it becomes far too obvious, even predictable...

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England since August, brookwood wrote:

Why does the report state on page 6
“Affer 2 doses, observed vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease with the Delta variant reaches approximately 65 to 70% with AstraZeneca Vaxzevria and 80 to 95% with Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty and Moderna
Spikevax”

Ransomnote - are we looking at the same report? Why does the report say Pfizer is 80 to 95 percent effective? HMMMM? I’m waiting.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1039677/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_49.pdf

For the record, I don't care if you are waiting. You're not special.

You left out their means of measurement:

"Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 has been assessed in England based on community testing data linked to
vaccination data from the National Immunisation Management System (NIMS), cohort studies such as the COVID Infection Survey
and GP electronic health record data. "

Now have a look at their wording "observed vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease".

Factor in this is a public health agency abusing the public's trust, just like our own CDC. The following is therefore what I believe to be the most likely reason they put forth such nonsense numbers.

Using an invalid Covid test with a false positive rate of 90%+,  and the fact that the agencies are running PCR tests at higher rates for unvaccinated, than they are for vaccinated (greater false positives for unvaccinated result), the NIH then falsely claims that the 'vaccine' is blocking SYMPTOMS of illness, when in fact they are pointing to false postives in healthy people.

There's a reason people are being forced to take these vaccines, and it's not because they 'work'. When the NIH starts reporting the devastating deaths and illnesses, we can begin to believe they may be reporting at least partial truth.

[Steve_Seattle]

If the charts are based on actual data, they need to be adjusted for things like age, co-morbidities, and percent of population vaccinated vs unvaccinated to give a clear picture of the actual impact of the vaccines. Nonetheless, they show that the claim that we are now in "a pandemic of the unvaccinated" is a complete lie.

Setting aside the controversy about vaccine side-effects, it appears that - at best - the vaccines give you a moderate, short-lived benefit. They are nowhere close to being the magic bullet that their defenders claim (but apparently don't really believe, given their obsession with the unvaccinated).

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England since August, Steve_Seattle wrote:

If the charts are based on actual data, they need to be adjusted for things like age, co-morbidities, and percent of population vaccinated vs unvaccinated to give a clear picture of the actual impact of the vaccines. Nonetheless, they show that the claim that we are now in "a pandemic of the unvaccinated" is a complete lie.

Setting aside the controversy about vaccine side-effects, it appears that - at best - the vaccines give you a moderate, short-lived benefit. They are nowhere close to being the magic bullet that their defenders claim (but apparently don't really believe, given their obsession with the unvaccinated).

*

The "moderate, short-lived benefit" of the vaccines is an illusion. England has two time limits they report, either 28 days or 60 days. So England counts a positive (false/asymptomatic or not) PCR test taken up to 60 days or 28 days prior to an actual illness or death, as a current death/hospitalization from Covid. Not whether you are actually ill with a respiratory condition, but if you had a positive test, using an invalid test up to 60 days prior that they keep forcing people to take over and over again (eventually you WILL keep false positives on record).

Then, the 'vaccinated' PCR tests are run at a lower rate (less inaccurate) than the unvaccinated.

Then, they typically don't count a person as 'vaccinated' until 2 weeks after 2nd Dose (or is it Booster, now?). That leaves out people who die as a result of the vaccine, whether due to anaphylaxis, stroke, heart attack etc. or via collapse of your immune system causing you to die abruptly of illnesses you could normally fight off, including influenzas, respiratory diseases etc.

Then England maintains a number of people whom they say are 'unlinked'. This number of people could alter the statistics. If they are unlinked, that could mean unvaccinated - because it seems a person vaccinated would have records (links). So that number is ignored statistically, and we don't know which group they belong to (see page 31).

Then recall this comparison of the vaccinated to the unvaccinated is done at a time all treatment is denied sick people. And sick people are then subjected to Remdesivir and Mizadolam and they are medically exterminated. May I suggest this happens to all, but is even more likely among the unvaccinated? There was some controversy about the outstanding amount of Midazolam ordered by the head of the UK agency before he left that position.

Hospitals Are Killing Thousands with Remdesivir | Guest: Dr. Brian Ardis
Conservative Review Podcast ^ | October 22, 2021 | Daniel Horowitz

Most Covid-19 Deaths were a direct result of the administration of Midazolam or Remdesivir – By Dr Mike Yeadon
theexpose.uk ^ | OCTOBER 11, 2021 | Dr. Mike Yeadon

This quote from page 6 makes it sound worse for the most fragile who are "vaccinated", which defies the reason to 'vaccinate' the vulnerable.

"Reduced antibody response and vaccine
effectiveness were seen after one dose of vaccine among the immunosuppressed group, however, after a second dose the
reduction in vaccine effectiveness is smaller (5)."

[ransomnote]

Mortality (openvaers.com)

[Delta 21]

I thot the shot kept you from spreading the China-Flu?

I thot the shot kept you from catching the China-Flu?

I thot the shot made it so the China-Flu didnt kill you, just made you sick for a few days?

Not a very good vaccine.

[Ragnar54]

These deaths and hospitalizations are alarming, but the percentage of the population that has been vaccinated should be taken into account in order to analyze what is happening. Supposedly, 68.5% of UK residents have been fully vaccinated. According to the data presented in the charts, the fully vaccinated accounted for 76% of the covid deaths. The remainder of the population (31.5%) had 1 or fewer vaccinations, and accounted for only 23% of the covid deaths. Interestingly, those with only 1 jab accounted for only 3.4% of the deaths.

From the best available data, the total population is about 68,405,286. The total fully vaccinated (2 or more shots) is 46,965,009. The total receiving at least 1 shot is 51,425,763. The total receiving only 1 shot is the difference between the first dose population and the fully vaccinated population. The total non-vaccinated population is the difference between the total population and the first dose population, or about 16,979,523 and the total fully vaccinated number is about 46,965,009.

The death totals are taken from:

"Covid-19 Deaths Table 10 (b) of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status in England. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by the UKHSA, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21."

Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England since August

shots	0 shot	1 shot	2+ shots
population	16,979,523	4,503,965	46,775,202
Deaths	3070	514	11444
Death Rate	.000180527	.000115227	.000243671

Vaccinations in United Kingdom

U.K. Population

So the death rate appears to decrease with the first shot, then increase with the second or third (to above the unvaccinated level). Perhaps an endless series of "booster" shots only benefits those collecting royalties from vaccine sales.

NIH and CDC collect a combined $64.3 million in royalty revenues in 2020

The FDA, CDC, Media and Politicians Receive Money from Vaccine Makers.

As has been pointed out elsewhere, the death rate in the unvaccinated from the Chinese Virus is extremely low. How high will it go with enough "booster" vaccines?. And what happens if the "coincidental" deaths after vaccination are reclassified?