11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose illness. The Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media as the “gold standard” for Covid diagnosis. But the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:
“PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
Yes.
Next issue.
The case fatality rate is around 20%, making it ten times more deadly than Covid-19.
The case fatality rate of Covid-19 is a whopping 2%?!
I had no idea!
Regards,
BKMK
PCR - Political Conversation Response?
It’s even worse than all that: they haven’t used this actual “virus”, which was pieced together in part my a machine set to mold DNA fragments as close to a SARS virus as possible, and in part by committee, for any of the PCR tests. Instead, they admitted to using a mix of some, what was it, monkey kidney cells and human flesh cells, or something similar.
Given the PCR tests[SIC] accuracy rate of 50%-ish and it’s inability to discern between ‘variants’ yes it is the weapon of choice for the alt-far-left. An even on their way out the door Democrats can’t help but reveal their inner communist. I read an article over at TheRightScoop about that, “Bill De Blasio to force ALL employers in NYC to mandate vaccines for employees”, so give that a look. First, employers will sue to stop this, and second the new NYC mayor takes over January 1, 2022. Taking a PCR test[SIC] is the same odds as flipping a coin and letting it decide if you have covid or not.
Calls out Dr. Fauci has a FRAUD in 1996. Inventor of PCR says it is NOT FOR TESTING.
Dr Anthony Fauci has found himself in yet another storm after a trove of emails from his professional inbox were released to the public. The documents, obtained by the Washington Post and Buzzfeed News via the Freedom of Information Act, raise several questions about what top health officials in the United States knew and didn't know about the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Now, a resurfaced interview of a Nobel prize-winning immunologist slamming the NIH head is making waves across the Internet. Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize in 1993 for inventing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing process used to diagnose coronavirus cases, reportedly said that Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, lacked knowledge of medicine and was willing to lie on national television. Mullis reportedly also admitted in another resurfaced video that a PCR test "doesn't tell you you're sick."
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing," Mullis said of the highest-paid United States federal government employee in a resurfaced video interview. "The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in."
"Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body," Mullis continued. "You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera,” he added.
Can't say we weren't warned.
Ya think?! I mean, this is about the most Captain Obvious, No Sh*t Sherlock statement of all time.
Ping
A well written article. Pretty long, but it makes a complex subject understandable.