Posted on 12/01/2021 3:54:12 PM PST by ransomnote
[H/T LilFarmer]
Here's the link: 5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)
Posted on 1:59 PM · Dec 1st, 2021
Not Safe, Not Effective, and it’s Mandatory.
Table 1.
Age range (years): 0.01 -107 years
Mean = 50.9 years
n = 34952
There are 8,760 hours in a year. They gave the vaccine to a THREE DAY old infant???
re: “Not Safe, Not Effective, and it’s Mandatory.”
Joe “Tato” Biden in a nutshell.
How did they keep it hidden for 55 YEARS?
Pfizer has petitioned a court to allow it to withhold the report for 55 years instead of responding to demands it be released now.
Do you mean a 3 day old Guinea Pig?
I read it a couple days ago after you posted it I believe. I was shocked too, especially since those figures were only for 3 months. Can’t imagine what they are now.
Actually, Pfizer claims they can only release 500 pages a month. At that rate, it’ll take 55 years to disseminate the entire thing. My question is why TF would it take them a month to release 500 measly pages? I sure hope they’d be contiguous pages too!
55 years already? Where did the time go? Who is the President?
5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
“Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2. Pfizer will continue routine pharmacovigilance activities on behalf of BioNTech according to the Pharmacovigilance Agreement in place, in order to assure patient safety and will inform the Agency if an evaluation of the safety data yields significant new information for
BNT162”
IOW, you’re misrepresenting the report but that is to be expected from an admitted opponent of all vaccines in general.
IIRC, it’s not Pfizer which is balking at releasing the documents. It is whatever agency was charged with approving the vaccines for EUA status—CDC. FDA? They have the documents Pfizer submitted for the approval and the agency is apparently subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
It appears that page 8 has redactions….
So, in the figures “relevant cases” listed as 42086. Deaths listed as 1223. That’s about 0.029…. Let’s say 0.03% incident ratio.
Folks, that’s a 3 in 100 chance of DYING from the vaccine. Their numbers!!
That’s Pfizer’s conclusion. So Pfizer says their drug is ok and will continue to monitor it despite the adverse reactions.
Are you really that stupid?
Paging the FR jab cadres! Tell us again about the science fiction you call science and how you have to maim or kill us to save us!
0.029 is 2.9%, not 0.029% or 0.03%.
The vaccines have substantial risks...especially in the out years (20+). For most older folks like myself, 20+ years puts me out beyond my expected family longevity anyway, so, the downside will be indistinguishable from normal age related health problems.
If you inject that into a 15 year old, that 20+ puts them in the prime of life. What problems can THEY expect in the out years as a result of the silliness that been crammed down our throats by despots like Fauci and his ilk?
Isn’t that a higher death rate than covid?
That’s Pfizer’s conclusion. So Pfizer says their drug is ok and will continue to monitor it despite the adverse reactions.
Are you really that stupid?
———————
Nope, no one is that stupid, not even ole dugout Dugway. I assume he is angling for a promotion from his handlers….maybe get off swing shift…..no one likes swing shift.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.