Posted on 11/25/2021 4:41:41 PM PST by ransomnote
If you get all your information from BBC News then you could be forgiven for thinking the world is currently experiencing a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated’. You only have to look at what they did in Austria, by discriminatorily putting the Unvaccinated in a lockdown, to be given that impression.
But you are being manipulated and lied to, and we can prove it.
The latest official Public Health data from Scotland not only proves that this the world is in fact in the grip of a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’, it also proves that those who have so far chosen to avoid the questionable Covid-19 injections, are much better off for doing so.
Because the data shows that the fully vaccinated are up to five times more likely to die if infected with Covid-19.
Public Health Scotland publish a weekly report containing statistics on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status, and their latest report was published on Wednesday 22nd November.
The report contains data on the number of Covid-19 cases and hospitalisations from October 23rd 2021 to November 19th 2021, and the number of Covid-19 deaths from 16th October 2021 to 12th November 2021.
Here’s what the latest report revealed in terms of whether this is a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated or Fully Vaccinated’…
Table 18 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 cases per week by vaccination status between October 23rd and November 19th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.
This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 cases in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of cases per week by vaccination status as well as the projected number of cases per week up to December 17th 2021 based on the current trend.
As things stand there were 28,711 Covid-19 cases among the unvaccinated population between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, with projections showing cases could increase to a cumulative total of approximately 60,000 by Dec 17th among the unvaccinated.
But there are far more cases among the vaccinated population, with 50,222 cases being recorded between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, and projections show cases could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 105,000 by Dec 17th.
Table 19 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations per week by vaccination status between October 23rd and November 19th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.
This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 hospitalisations in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of hospitalisations per week by vaccination status as well as the projected number of hospitalisations per week up to December 17th 2021 based on the current trend.
Between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th there were 559 hospitalisations among the unvaccinated population, and projections show that the cumulative total of hospitalisations among the unvaccinated could rise to approximately 1,000 by Dec 17th.
But things are looking much worse for the fully vaccinated. There were 1,564 Covid-19 hospitalisations among the vaccinated population between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th. But projections show this could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 3,300 by Dec 17th.
Table 20 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 deathsper week by vaccination status between October 16th and November 12th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.
This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 deaths in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of deaths per week by vaccination status as well as the projected number of deaths per week up to December 10th 2021 based on the current trend.
As things stand there were just 54 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, with projections showing deaths could increase to a cumulative total of approximately 95 by Dec 10th among the unvaccinated.
But if you are fully vaccinated then your chances of dying if infected with Covid-19 look far worse. Because there were 447 deaths among the vaccinated population between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, and projections show deaths could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 930 by Dec 10th.
The following chart shows the percentage of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status according to the latest Public Health Scotland ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’.
The chart shows that the vaccinated population accounted for 64% of cases and 74% of hospitalisations between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, whilst the unvaccinated population accounted for 36% of cases and 26% of hospitalisations.
Meanwhile between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, the vaccinated population accounted for a frightening 89% of Covid-19 deaths, whilst the unvaccinated population accounted for just 11%.
The above chart also clearly demonstrates something rather strange considering we know that the Covid-19 injections cannot prevent infection or transmission of the Covid-19 virus (ask yourself what the point of vaccine passports are, because they’re certainly not about “stopping the spread”), but are alleged to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death by up to 95%.
But if this was the case then we should be seeing that the percentage of hospitalisations and deaths attributed to the vaccinated population is much less than the percentage of cases attributed to the vaccinated population. But we’re not, which calls for further investigation, and this is what we found –
The above chart shows the case-hospitalisation rate (No. Cases / No. Hosp.), case-fatality rate (No. Cases / No. Deaths), and hospitalisation fatality rate (No. Hosp / No. Deaths) by vaccination status.
These are the figures we should be looking at to determine the effectiveness of the vaccines because it is impossible to be hospitalised with Covid-19 or die with Covid-19 if you have not first been infected with Covid-19.
Therefore, the rates per 100,000 of the general population used by the likes of BBC News are used to deceive you.
Demonstrating the effectiveness of the vaccines by using the number of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status per 100,000 of the general population, is like demonstrating the effectiveness of a professional egg cracker by using the number of broken yolks per 100,000 eggs in the world.
The professional egg cracker cannot break a yolk unless they first crack an egg, the same as a person cannot die with Covid-19 unless first infected with Covid-19. Therefore, the effectiveness of the egg cracker should be calculated against the number of eggs cracked, and the effectiveness of a vaccine against death due to Covid-19 should be calculated against the number of confirmed cases of Covid-19.
Now that we’ve cleared that up – It’s quite concerning to find that all three rates are much higher among the vaccinated population, we should surely be seeing the opposite if the Covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death?
But unfortunately the above figures do not just suggest that the vaccines are ineffective, they actually suggest that they make the recipient worse.
A vaccine effectiveness of +95% against death from Covid-19 would mean that the unvaccinated population have a 95% higher chance of dying if infected with Covid-19 than the vaccinated.
A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the vaccines are ineffective and the vaccinated and unvaccinated have the same chance of dying if infected with Covid-19.
But a vaccine effectiveness of -95% would mean that the vaccines actually make the recipient worse, by for example decimating the recipients immune system, or invoking a response such as antibody-dependent-enhancement. Which makes the following figures extremely concerning.
The above chart shows the increased risk of hospitalisation if infected with Covid-19, the increased risk of death if infected with Covid-19, and the increased risk of death if hospitalised with Covid-19, among the vaccinated population. The percentages have been calculated based on the ‘Rates by Vaccination Status’ calculated in the previous chart.
The chart shows that the vaccinated are 63% more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19 if infected, therefore this shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of -63% against hospitalisation.
But the most concerning figure demonstrated on the above chart shows that the vaccinated are 394% more likely to die with Covid-19 if infected. This shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of -394% against death suggesting the injections are completely decimating the recipients immune systems.
So there you have it. The latest data published by Public Health Scotland confirms that with 64% of cases, 74% of hospitalisations, and 89% of deaths over the past four weeks having been among the vaccinated population, that this is not a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated’, and is instead very much a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’.
But not only that, the data also proves that the Covid-19 injections not only do not work, they also make the recipient worse, with a case-fatality rate five times higher among the vaccinated population than the unvaccinated population.
For the good of humanity it’s time to switch off BBC News and realise they’ve been manipulating you and lying to you, because the past year and half has had absolutely nothing to do with a virus, and everything to do with control.
Funnier than that time you f'd up and looked in the mirror?
About 32% of Scotland is “fully vaccinated”.
82.4% have 2 shots.
But 89% of the COVID deaths are in the vaccinated group.
And 75% of the hospitalizations are in the vaccinated group.
You could know, if you read your own links.
Watch out for that MOH site you posted. My security system warns it is a risky site to visit.
An interesting comparison and conclusion by me.
One graph shows the number of Covid-19 “cases per week”. About (my guess) 60% vaxxinated, 40% unvaxxinated.
Another graph shows the number of Covid-19 “hospitalizations per week”. About (my guess) 65% vaxxinated, 35% unvaxxinated.
A third graph shows the number of Covid-19 “deaths per week” About (my guess) 85% vaxxinated, 15% unvaxxinated.
My conclusion... unvaxxinated are less likely to go to the hospital with COVID so they are less likely to DIE from COVID because the hospital is where THEY KILL YOU! And the unvaxxed KNOW THIS.
Thanks... I don’t spend much time there
ROFLMAO!!! You really are hilarious.
I did read ALL Vince Flynn's Mitch Rapp novels... that's as close to the CIA as I ever got.
Expect this story to be re-posted on FR when it gets picked up by the other COVID-19 sites. They report on other’s stories. Usually the same FReepers that repost the same stories, but just from different sites.
Exactly what a CIA derp would say.
You got it all figured out, don't ya Furry.
Still, they got a lot of catching up to do if they wanna keep up with the all-pervasive vax fear propaganda campaign and enablers like you, amirite?
| faucetman wrote: |
An interesting comparison and conclusion by me. One graph shows the number of Covid-19 “cases per week”. About (my guess) 60% vaxxinated, 40% unvaxxinated. Another graph shows the number of Covid-19 “hospitalizations per week”. About (my guess) 65% vaxxinated, 35% unvaxxinated. A third graph shows the number of Covid-19 “deaths per week” About (my guess) 85% vaxxinated, 15% unvaxxinated. My conclusion... unvaxxinated are less likely to go to the hospital with COVID so they are less likely to DIE from COVID because the hospital is where THEY KILL YOU! And the unvaxxed KNOW THIS. |
Good observation. I do think the unvaccinated are more aware of the weaponized hospital situation than 'vaccinated'.
It's complicated though. Some ( I don't know what proportion) hospitals are giving the 'vaccinated' Ivermectin and reserving the multi-organ failure inducing CDC Covid policy for the unvaccinated. (Remdesivir with Midazolam chaser)
So I believe there's still some of that immune system suppression some are seeing.
Can someone explain this to me?
P53, table 20 of the original document has the raw numbers of deaths. Plus the death rate per 100,000 plus standardized by age.
The expose article on its graph dealing with death, only used the raw numbers - 11 unvax deaths to 99 vax deaths Nov 6 - 12. But a higher percentage are vaxed, so that just comparing raw numbers doesn’t give the right picture.
I’m not happy with the original document standardizing for age without giving the data how they did that. And I’d need to see how they adjusted for the “per 100,000” numbers too. Without giving the original numbers, this just seems like they made up numbers without proof
I’m not vaccinated and never will be. But I did decide to look at these numbers since there was claims of falsification. And I found that. I don’t believe we need to weaken our argument by using wrong data. Unless I am seeing it wrong.
I would like anybody to explain, using numbers. Just saying that everything is incorrect isn’t specific enough
CottonBall wrote:Can someone explain this to me? P53, table 20 of the original document has the raw numbers of deaths. Plus the death rate per 100,000 plus standardized by age. The expose article on its graph dealing with death, only used the raw numbers - 11 unvax deaths to 99 vax deaths Nov 6 - 12. But a higher percentage are vaxed, so that just comparing raw numbers doesn’t give the right picture. ransomnote: What is the 'right picture' you wanted to see? I was comfortable knowing 110 persons total died, 99 were 'vaccinated'. I know most people are 'vaccinated' so I 'get' what the data means. I’m not happy with the original document standardizing for age without giving the data how they did that. And I’d need to see how they adjusted for the “per 100,000” numbers too. Without giving the original numbers, this just seems like they made up numbers without proof I gleaned useful information from the Expose article as written. I'm sorry to read that you are 'unhappy' with the original (Scott. gov) document. I don't know why you'd 'need' to see the Scottish government's numbers, but if so - perhaps research further on your own. I’m not vaccinated and never will be. But I did decide to look at these numbers since there was claims of falsification. And I found that. I don’t believe we need to weaken our argument by using wrong data. Unless I am seeing it wrong. You are seeing it 'wrong' if by 'wrong' one can mean 'different' from your preferred perspective. This data is not falsified or distored. It offers some analysis and correctly identified perspectives looking at data. Anyone can dig for more. It did not mislable or mislead. The fact that you doubt the Scottish government's numbers probably isn't going to be addressed on an article in the forum. I would like anybody to explain, using numbers. Just saying that everything is incorrect isn’t specific enough |
Oh wait... I thought you were talking about a different site. That one is the Singapore Ministry of Health. I've been on that site VERY frequently over the past several months. Never had any kind of security warning.
Another very important factor to consider when comparing "Deaths" between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Besides the fact that there are 4X as many vaccinated as unvaxxed in the general populartion, as a group, the vaccinated tend to be significantly older and sicker. It's primarily the young and healthy who have avoided vaccination now (for good reason).
Age and health are the two strongest correlating factors. Between these two groups it would be expected that the vaccinated would die at a much higher rate. The fact that they are close to the same in numbers as the general populations means, the vaccines are improving the chances of those who take them. Enough to compensate for significantly higher risk factors.
The explanation is in the fine print of Table 20. If you follow the links, it takes you here:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween2januaryand24september2021
Where you will learn this:
The age-standardised mortality rate for deaths involving COVID-19 is 32 times higher for unvaccinated people than for those who received the second dose
It's basically a way of correcting for the factors I just mentioned in an earlier post. MOST Covid deaths are old people. But, MOST deaths of ANY kind, are also old people. In Scotland, as in most countries very close to 100% of elderly people are vaccinated. Thus, these "vaccinated" people are dying at a MUCH higher rate than the "unvaccinated" younger people. This factoring, done by Scottish Health authorities, corrects for this age bias.
They also mention the other factor I mentioned: Overall health is another factor. They don't have a way of correcting for this, but... typically, older people have significantly higher co-morbidities.
I'm fascinated by another factor that stands out...(one that I also see in the Singapore data) that is: People who receive only 1 dose are close to the same danger level as the unvaccinated. It really takes TWO doses, and some time for the benefits to become significant.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 89% of Covid-19 Deaths among the Fully Vaccinated – Latest Public Health Data proves this is a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’ and suggests the Vaccinated are more likely to die, SomeCallMeTim wrote: |
| Can someone explain this to me? The explanation is in the fine print of Table 20. If you follow the links, it takes you here: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween2januaryand24september2021 Where you will learn this: The age-standardised mortality rate for deaths involving COVID-19 is 32 times higher for unvaccinated people than for those who received the second dose It's basically a way of correcting for the factors I just mentioned in an earlier post. MOST Covid deaths are old people. But, MOST deaths of ANY kind, are also old people. In Scotland, as in most countries very close to 100% of elderly people are vaccinated. Thus, these "vaccinated" people are dying at a MUCH higher rate than the "unvaccinated" younger people. This factoring, done by Scottish Health authorities, corrects for this age bias. They also mention the other factor I mentioned: Overall health is another factor. They don't have a way of correcting for this, but... typically, older people have significantly higher co-morbidities. I'm fascinated by another factor that stands out...(one that I also see in the Singapore data) that is: People who receive only 1 dose are close to the same danger level as the unvaccinated. It really takes TWO doses, and some time for the benefits to become significant. |
SomeCallMeTim,
Since the official report states that the Age Standardized Mortality Rate (ASMR) for Deaths invovling Covid-19 ASMRs do not show a causal link between vaccines and a risk of mortality, how do you feel the ASMR information you quoted is best interpreted by the public?
Quoting it as you do, might people get the false impression that the ASMR actually indicates the 'vaccines' made the 32 fold difference in mortality when the document states that calculation does not mean that.
It seems you're refuting the Expose's article's title indicating the vaccines result in higher rates of illness among the vaccinated by misquoting the Age Standardized Mortality Rate.
The Expose's article title is correct - it truly is a Pandemic of The 'Vaccinated'.
Really? You look at that page, and ALL that data that shows vaccinated people are dying from Covid at far LOWER rates than unvaccinated, and THIS is your takeaway? I'm really starting to doubt that you are a serious person?
CORRELATION does not equal CAUSE.
As serious scientist, they went to great lengths to make this clear. They specifically state:
ASMRs take into account differences in age structure and population size to allow comparisons between vaccination status groups; however some differences between the groups such as health status may remain and partly explain the differences in ASMRs.
yes... there COULD be differences for other reasons. Younger people MIGHT be having a raging disease of some other kind that the older people are not seeing. It's HIGHLY unlikely. But, possible. These authors are simply stating that they did not dig deep enough to eliminate that chance.
What they DO SHOW is... VERY STRONG correlation. It's very convincing data to me.
You can ignore it if you like. I guess, ignorance is bliss.
“People who receive only 1 dose are close to the same danger level as the unvaccinated.”
I noticed that too. I imagine we’ll see booster after booster, since the effect fades.
“Thus, these “vaccinated” people are dying at a MUCH higher rate than the “unvaccinated” younger people.”
Yes, I do understand that. And that’s why the Expose article is disingenuous, giving straight numbers without giving the total vaccinated and total vaccinated or the rate of deaths for each category is intentionally misleading. Especially since the conclusion from it is in the headline.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
