Posted on 11/19/2021 9:31:46 AM PST by ransomnote
PING
What is Brandnewtube?
If you say ever a lot it means you’re super serious and what you say must be important and true.
Except they did with targeted vaccinations with small pox. When an outbreak occurred they would move in and vaccinate the immediate area.
>>“You never, ever, ever start a vaccination programme in the middle of a Pandemic. Are they insane?” (37 minute video on BrandNewTube)
I don’t get it, let’s assume the vaccine (any vaccine) was safe, and everyone agreed - when would start a vaccination program? after everyone died?
If there wasn’t a need for the vaccine - i.e. no pandemic - why would anyone get it?
Not even getting the faintest idea what he is talking about.
Still spreading hoaxes? Roger Hodkinson is a low level MD. He was never the “Chairman of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons” a position that doesn’t exist.
Isn’t that what they did during the Polio pandemic?
That’s only one of many examples.
Maybe in his rush to be a Dr. NO!! he used the wrong phrase.
You never, ever, ever start a vaccination programme in the middle of a Pandemic......
When you vaccinate in the midst of an active virus it is likely to mutate, to survive, and render your vaccine useless.
He’s not the only doctor to say this.
Besides vaccines, there’s this thing called “treatment”.
I realize people like him will be eliminated in short order, but at least before they assassinate him he will have rendered an incalculably valuable service for the benefit of humanity...and my sanity.
>>When you vaccinate in the midst of an active virus it is likely to mutate, to survive, and render your vaccine useless.
Good point, but I am not sure there is always the option to wait - once hospitals get overwhelmed, there is no treatment to be had except for the lucky few.
When covid first started, and there was many unknowns, I told my wife - I hope I either get it right away (and thus would have a bed available for treatment if I needed it), or not at all.
bkmk
They’re starting a global takeover in the middle of a pandemic. And yes, they are insane.
What kind of argument is this? What would the point of vaccination after a pandemic, after all the weak have already died be? Are we supposed to wait till our society collapses and then vaccinate?
If you want to, argue that the vaccines aren’t effective enough (But don’t use misleading numbers. Always compare the vaccinated and unvaccinated within the same age group. The difference in deaths and hospitalizations betweeen different age groups are so big that using aggregate numbers leads to a wrong conclusion.). There is a place for reasonable criticism of the vaccines: the efficacy of the vaccines for the elderly is reduced, and therefore it is wrong to put all eggs in one basket. Vaccinating children is useless.
Many vehement anti-vaxxers don’t seem to realize that they are in the minority (probably not on Freerepublic, but society-wide). Most people have been vaccinated and using bombastic rhetoric (”The vaccinated are all going to die within a year.”) won’t persuade them. What’s worse, it will allow those who are saying vaccination is the only way out of this pandemic (most governments...) to portray all critics of vaccination as insane.
Do you, the most vehement anti-vaxxers of Freerepublic, believe that you are going to persuade anyone with your over-the-top rhetoric or are you content with preaching to the choir?
It would be more beneficial to look for as many treatment / prevention options as possible. The problem with anti-vaxxers is that they actually persuaded a certain segment of population not to get vaccinated, but they don’t offer much instead of the vaccines. Shouting “ivermectin” isn’t enough (and many anti-vaxxers don’t even shout “ivermectin”).
Covid-19 requires a complex approach such as Vitamin D, magnesium, zinc, selenium and Omega-3 fatty acids for the young and middle-aged and the above-mentioned + vaccination for the elderly and obese (+ monoclonal antibodies after getting infected). Throw in some ivermectin if you want to.
Observe the "bushing out" of the variants that followed introduction of vaccines on this web page.
Had we simply treated with HCQ/zinc/azithromyic and/or ivermectin and reduced inflammation in lung tissue with budenoside type steroids, the selective pressure would not have been introduced into the population. Broad, natural immunity to the whole virus would have been generated instead of narrow antibodies to a very early version of the spike protein.
That’s different than mandated mass vaxxing, though.
And variola isn’t an RNA virus.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Dr Roger Hodkinson – “You never, ever, ever start a vaccination programme in the middle of a Pandemic. Are they insane?” (37 minute video on BrandNewTube), Czech_Occidentalist wrote: |
What kind of argument is this? What would the point of vaccination after a pandemic, after all the weak have already died be? Are we supposed to wait till our society collapses and then vaccinate? |
Covid is 99.9% survivable for most people, and that's during a time that all treatments are withheld from hospitals and clinics, and in their place, the CDC's lethal "Covid Protocol" is implemented. Just imagine how survivable it would be if they actually treated sick people with safe effective medications in use for years, FDA approved (HCQ, Ivermectin).
This argument "don't vaccinate in a pandemic' was first raised by Geert Vanden Boscche and in a tenant of virology. Vaccinating during a pandemic gives the virus maximal opporuntunity to escape all immunity. It's not done. Had Covid been anywhere near as dangerous as portrayed, we would have to get through it and vaccinate later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.