Posted on 11/13/2021 7:11:32 AM PST by upchuck
When the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other powerful entities control (and outright change) the language surrounding the COVID injection, the pandemic, and related topics, how can we as citizens trust what we hear from the public health officials and media?
It’s becoming more and more difficult, to be sure. We’ve seen throughout the pandemic, of course, that anyone and everyone questioning today’s contentious issues – such as whether to inject kids with a brand new drug that has absolutely no long-term safety data – are soundly pigeonholed as conspiracy theorists, “anti-vaxxers,” “domestic terrorists,” or “right-wing COVID-19 pandemic deniers.” But given how openly the government continues to move the goalposts simply to protect its agenda, it seems that many parents and medical professionals are willing to deal with these labels to keep raising questions.
A Big Brother move from the NIH and CDC: Government changes definition of injections to fit the narrative At the beginning of the pandemic, we were told that the COVID-19 shot was the only way out of the pandemic and that mass vaccination would help prevent the spread of COVID-19 by producing herd immunity. Real-world data shows this is simply not true, and while the COVID-19 shot can prevent hospitalization or death for some, it cannot prevent infection in many cases.
Real-world data also reveals that the “effectiveness” of these shots at preventing severe illness with SARS-CoV-2 wanes in a matter of months – a fact that officials and Big Pharma executives gladly use as justification for the endless parade of booster shots.
But instead of admitting that the COVID jab fails to adequately confer immunity against SARS-CoV-2 – and is, by this reasoning, not truly a vaxx per the CDC’s definition – government officials, in a concerning move straight out of 1984, have decided to simply change the official definition of a vaccine.
Before August 2021, this is how the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defined vaccine and vaccination:
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
These definitions are taken verbatim from a now-archived webpage on the CDC. But on September 1, 2021, the CDC changed these definitions, which now read as follows:
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Notice any key differences?
Leaked emails reveal CDC’s efforts to obscure the truth about mRNA COVID shots.
According to the U.S. government, a vaxx is no longer used to “produce immunity” but instead to simply stimulate an immune response against a disease, which may (or may not) provide protection.
These changes were brought about after a flurry of emails between CDC employees, who expressed concern that “Right-wing COVID-19 deniers are using [the] ‘vaccine’ definition to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines” and that “The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition.”
This is blatant gaslighting, according to critics. Suddenly, the definition of a vaccine is “problematic”?
Suddenly, we are told that jabs are only meant to prevent severe illness rather than prevent illness itself? It’s not new that vaccines aren’t perfect and frequently fail to protect people – so why change the definition now?
No Virginia, you can’t be “UN-vaxxed”.
20 million bureaucrats running this nation and we are supposed to trust them at their word.
Never…..
“a fact that officials and Big Pharma executives gladly use as justification for the endless parade of booster shots.”
Executive bonuses don’t just happen!
https://principia-scientific.com/a-cheap-new-covid-cure-just-did-away-any-need-for-a-vaccine/?fbclid=IwAR2s2UHwQ5G3VIq1ge4SW0veeSvy9LpbQBqWHPVYi7utbEi3VlKXUDCvsbs
Natural immunity should be considered to be a vaccine under this definition.
Fortunately, the basic problem of the ineffective shots are what is preventing the use of the vaccine passport.
The FBI just raided Project Veritas to obtain lawyer notes for the Washington Post - time for the FBI to be cancelled.
Overall am a proponent of vaccines for those that are truly vulnerable. Yet have very grave reservations about the use of mRNA vaccines in children who are not very vulnerable to COVID19 nor have they been shown to be transmitters. BTW people who truly have survived COVID19 infection and can demonstrate IgG antibodies are neither vulnerable nor are they transmitters. Health policy at NIH and CDC is now made by political commissars posing as scientists.
“A simple cure is out there against Covid! 4 cents per tablet at Walmart.”
Thanks...
The “vax” is a mutagen that creates an auto-immune disease in your body.
The only thing certain is the government and the media don’t want us to hear any bad news whatsoever. They both admit that they’re hiding things from us, and they’re so adamant about it one can easily conclude they’re hiding the truth.
The people who forced/coerced people to get the vaccine by threatening their livelihoods should face the most severe consequences if this turns out to have long term debilitating effects.
A friend observed that none of these people are bulletproof.
The inventor of mRNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, has been sounding the alarm regarding its use in this way since the beginning. He said he couldn’t conceive of a better way to accelerate the evolution of a virus than what we are doing now. This is my flawed analogy. Say there’s a population of 100,000 men and they range in height from four feet to eight feet. You kill off all the men who are exactly six feet tall so that the only ones who can reproduce are those who were not six feet tall. That’s what programming our immune systems with one tiny piece of the virus has done. The viruses are like people in that some have large spike proteins and others have smaller spike proteins. Occasionally, there may be a virus born with no spike protein. Your natural immune system will learn all the features of the virus so it will create a wide ranging immunity. But the “vaccine” programs the immune system to supercharge on just one tiny aspect at the expense of anything else it would do. Thus, “fully vaccinated” people are dying because they have compromised immune systems.
Geez, they use the term “right-wing covid deniers” like that was a bad thing.
“The CDC is lawless.”
You left out NIH, FDA, FBI, DOJ, etc, etc
Not exactly because the givernment agency would point out that natural immunity is not “administered” by one of the 3 identified processes.
Yepp ... politicizing the whole damn issue. I am sure they didn’t mention the left wing position prior to Xiden’s (s)election caused the current non-VAx position to be created and that Xiden has spoken out harshly about non-Vaxxers citizens to make them an enemy.
Besides, real science used to require a control group to measure the efficacy of the experimental vaccine. The givernment should be paying the non-vaxxers $$$ to take the risk of being in the control group. But we know the demonkkkraps know nothing about science.
Interesting. I’ve been taking 1000mg of lysine daily for 30 years.
“We are being subjected to a blizzard of lies (about everything).” - Mark Steyn
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.