1 posted on
11/06/2021 8:30:50 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
2 posted on
11/06/2021 8:32:49 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
I don’t know. Maybe we should ask half of the Navy if nuclear powered showers are safe.
3 posted on
11/06/2021 8:37:46 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up....)
To: BenLurkin
A heat exchanger, How exotic and unheard of.
5 posted on
11/06/2021 8:39:35 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up....)
To: BenLurkin
A good model for the next ice age.
6 posted on
11/06/2021 8:40:33 AM PDT by
gundog
(It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: BenLurkin
it makes use of heat that's vented as steam through the cooling towers of the barge's nuclear fission plants, which would otherwise be wasted.Sounds like it would lower Global Warming. Greta should be championing it.
7 posted on
11/06/2021 8:42:19 AM PDT by
McGruff
To: BenLurkin
Would YOU take a nuclear-powered shower?
Everyone who claims to care about global warming should. But that would require not being a hypocrite, and hypocrisy is the first commandment of the global warming enviro-cult.
To: BenLurkin
Wouldn’t need soap— just debride the dirt and oily dirty skin right off the derma.
Maybe.
Those craaaazy Russians. One comment: a colleague used to go to Kazakhstan on medical missions, and the number one complaint he dealt with were people of all ages coming in and pointing to their thyroid goiters/probable cancers caused from living in Stalin’s nuclear test site province. Thousands of them. Really sad. That and Chernobyl (the HBO movie is appallingly horrifying- because the bare truth did not need much dramatization).
10 posted on
11/06/2021 8:46:34 AM PDT by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: BenLurkin
Hot water is hot water. Unless their plant suffered two major leaks, no one would be at risk. And, if the plant suffered such leaks, it would be immediately shut down — same solution.
11 posted on
11/06/2021 8:55:37 AM PDT by
bobbo666
(Baizuo)
To: BenLurkin
How difficult would it be to continuously monitor the steam for radioactivity? If it were present then immediately stop the distribution and shut down the reactor. There ought to be no leaks in a well engineered system.
To: BenLurkin
submariners do it all the time, breath nuclear powered O2 also.
14 posted on
11/06/2021 9:10:05 AM PDT by
mylife
(Joe Biden is like bald tires in the rain, Alec Baldwin with a gun..)
To: BenLurkin
It’s even worse than that. The nuclear power is contagious.
16 posted on
11/06/2021 9:12:45 AM PDT by
Thud
To: BenLurkin
Seems very practical even without the Left breathing down their backs.
17 posted on
11/06/2021 9:34:18 AM PDT by
BobL
(I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
To: BenLurkin
Now a heat pump is bad?
What next?
19 posted on
11/06/2021 9:47:58 AM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.I ha)
To: BenLurkin
I like the snappy Red, White and Blue color scheme.

What could go wrong? Akademik Lomonosov will use small modular reactor technology and is equipped with two KLT-40C reactor systems with 35MW capacity each. It has been designed to access hard-to-reach areas where it can operate for three to five years without the need for refuelling. It also has an overall life cycle of 40 years, which may be extended to 50 years.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Layout-of-the-KLT-40S-reactor-Source-11_fig2_278188044
20 posted on
11/06/2021 11:18:59 AM PDT by
ASOC
(This space for rent)
To: BenLurkin
Soviets doing Soviet things again I see. In Soviet Russia radiation gets you!!!
21 posted on
11/06/2021 12:50:09 PM PDT by
Thunder90
(All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson