Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: marcusmaximus

I do NOT believe that Alec Baldwin was only getting less than $300,000.00 for this film.


2 posted on 11/04/2021 5:09:50 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ann Archy

Not an expert, but as an investor in the deal was he working cheap and expecting the payoff from sales later on?
Tax dodge?


3 posted on 11/04/2021 5:11:57 PM PDT by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ann Archy

That’s just for the acting and producing stuff. His money will come from the movie profits....which ain’t gonna happen.


4 posted on 11/04/2021 5:12:34 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ann Archy

That’s up to the point of release. I’d bet he gets a percentage of the now non-existing box office and video sales.


5 posted on 11/04/2021 5:15:28 PM PDT by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ann Archy
I do NOT believe that Alec Baldwin was only getting less than $300,000.00 for this film.

This was only the production budget.

In Hollyweird there is a thing called a "backend deal," which is a cut of the box office. I'm positive that Baldwin would have had a cut of the box office as part of his full "compensation package."

16 posted on 11/05/2021 3:49:39 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson