Posted on 10/31/2021 4:13:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
Interesting thought.
If, for example, 5% of the vile vials are dangerous and 95% aren't...
...hmmm, could it be that...
...the placebo control group is 95%* of the injected population?...
...And they sold the government normal saline at sky-high potent vaccine prices?
* 95% for one jab, 90% for two jabs and 80% with one booster...
WTH
exactly correct ... sadly.
How many times are you going to post this same lie? VAERS doesn't report events due to the vaccine.
And you know it.
Would sure like to know who received the “ benign” lots!
That’s a good idea.
Too much is scrubbed by Big Brother these days.
The vax pushers seem to have absolutely no problem at all trusting Fauci, big pharma, the CDC, Bill Gates and the social media giants. Y’all just need to shut up and get your 4th jab of the wonderful “safe and effective” cocktail.
As to be expected, given that these were technically massive trials. What doesn’t square with that however is that they ended their earlier trials early by claiming that the jabs were so effective it would be unethical not to give them to those who had the placebo. Thus, they made it impossible to track what should have been the earliest, tracked adverse reactions beyond a couple of months.
LOL. Without this data this entire analysis is completely meaningless.
A lot could have 10 times more events because it contained 10 times more doses.
the vaccine cards that I have seen have the lot listed on them.
“VAERS doesn’t report events due to the vaccine.
And you know it.”
Then why is it called ‘Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)’?
There you go, bringing facts into the argument...
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data [Based on data sampling, 5% of sampled batches associated with high adverse events, contrasted with flu], metmom wrote: |
Is there anywhere where it tells which states? |
I tried to isolate data but it's massive, that's why I think this report sampled the data. Too much to look at.
I tried using the CDC's VAERS but it collapsed whenever I tried to perform searches. I found that the alternative search tool at medalerts worked well. But that displayed a table and I forgot where I went to download the entire bundle.
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
For now I posted the 14,000 line table for Virginia, and the 1,600 line table for DC out in the sticks in the FR outback.
There has to be a better way! Maybe to work the data in Excel on the desktop to make it manageable. Would need to download the datapacket. Not sure I'm the person for the job. Wait! Wait! I should have collected the lot numbers off theExpose article and only searched those to get a decent comparison. Right now, the data is like looking for numbers in Ye Olde Phone Book! Yeah, I really should have gone with some specific lot/manufacturers off theExpose article, which probably means I'd have to type them one at a time! GAH!
Here's Virginia
Covid 'Vaccine' Lot Numbers for Virginia
Here's DC
Covid 'Vaccine' Lot Numbers for DC
Note that each section, e.g., MOderna, starts with the name of the manufacturer and the total number of lot numbers. Then the following lines are specific lot numbers. If the person typed them wrong or left a dash instead of a number, there's a line for it. Those continue until you get to the next manufacturere - with a 'total' header followed by individual lot numbers.
Some VAERS entries don't list lot number or manufacturer, and some don't even say in the expected field what vaccine it's for so there is some garbage data. I always thought that the data is an amazing mess considering the CDC gives itself 6 weeks before uploading a report, if ever, to review it. So they review a report and upload it and then I find there's no formal vaccine classification, but if they read the doctors notes, the CDC could have corrected that.
Except I think the CDC intentionally designed the field requirements to provide buggy missing data.
If anyone else wants to use Medalerts.org to do a better job than I did (e.g., maybe search for specific lot numbers), I put the search terms from the specific sections (1-5) of the template I used at the top of the DC, and Virginia table links (so I'd remember what I did).
Thanks and big bookmark!
Me too.
LOL. Without this data this entire analysis is completely meaningless.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
The obligatory troll post christening any anti-narrative thread ‘meaningless.’
Since it’s meaningless to you, no doubt you’ll run along and let others decide for themselves...oh...wait...
Oh. A quality control problem.
I wonder if the bad batches are 100% gone, or a few remain somewhere for a comparative test against safer ones.
You can't be serious. Do you actually think this analysis tells us anything if we don't know the relative size of the lots?
A few researchers have examined the contents of the vaccines and have found nanotechnology and parasites which became active after the 'vaccine' sample had warmed up under the microscope lights. It's possible 'expired' doses have active nano or parasites. In particular I would think the self-assembling nanotechnology and developing parasites seen under the 'scope would be a significant blood clot issue.
Dr. Carrie Madej: First U.S. Lab Examines “Vaccine” Vials, HORRIFIC [partial transcript and 16 min video. The content is stunning, important-please share]
redvoicemedia.com ^ | September 29, 2021 | Stew Peters, Dr. Carry Madej
Dr John B. @DrJohnB2 (1/n) A microscopy analysis of a Moderna #Covidvaccine sample.A fresh sample was analyzed with bright field and phase contrast microscopy.
twitter.com ^ | October 11, 2021 | Dr John B. @DrJohnB2
Jab: Scientist Discovers Hatching Eggs, Parasites Birthed After Injection (partial transcript, some images from 14 min video, related links)
rumble ^ | October 15, 2021 | Stew Peters, Dr. Jane Ruby, the work of Dr. Zelusky
Dr. John B. - New "Vaccine" Microscope Analysis Photos - Tim Truth (11 min video, new images of 'vaccine' contents)
ugetube.com/watch ^ | October 14, 2021 | Dr. John B.
BANNED & REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE - DR. ZALEWKSI FINDS ANOTHER LIFE FORM IN VAX VIALS (includes some notes and images from 14 minute video)
bitchute.com ^ | October 10th, 2021. | Dr. Franc Zalewski
Perhaps it is not the individual lots, themselves, that are somehow "contaminated" or "more dangerous," but the people who administer the shots?
E.g.: If a lot is sent to Detroit, and Detroit then records a suspiciously high number of adverse reactions - might that not be due to the fact that the shots in Detroit were all administered in WalMart supermarkets, by student-trainees who, just a few years ago, would never have dreamed that they would one day be administering injections? Trainees who have no idea what it means to "aspirate" when injecting?
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.