Posted on 10/31/2021 4:13:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.
The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.
The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset .
The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.
The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.
Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.
The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.
The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.
The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.
The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.
All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.
The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.
This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).
The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.
Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.
The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.
This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.
The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.
Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.
This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.
Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.
The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.
Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.
The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA
As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.
However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.
This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.
The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.
This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.
The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.
One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.
Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes”.
But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.
Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?
Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?
Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?
Could this just be a quality control issue?
A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”.
Interesting thought.
If, for example, 5% of the vile vials are dangerous and 95% aren't...
...hmmm, could it be that...
...the placebo control group is 95%* of the injected population?...
...And they sold the government normal saline at sky-high potent vaccine prices?
* 95% for one jab, 90% for two jabs and 80% with one booster...
WTH
exactly correct ... sadly.
How many times are you going to post this same lie? VAERS doesn't report events due to the vaccine.
And you know it.
Would sure like to know who received the “ benign” lots!
That’s a good idea.
Too much is scrubbed by Big Brother these days.
The vax pushers seem to have absolutely no problem at all trusting Fauci, big pharma, the CDC, Bill Gates and the social media giants. Y’all just need to shut up and get your 4th jab of the wonderful “safe and effective” cocktail.
As to be expected, given that these were technically massive trials. What doesn’t square with that however is that they ended their earlier trials early by claiming that the jabs were so effective it would be unethical not to give them to those who had the placebo. Thus, they made it impossible to track what should have been the earliest, tracked adverse reactions beyond a couple of months.
LOL. Without this data this entire analysis is completely meaningless.
A lot could have 10 times more events because it contained 10 times more doses.
the vaccine cards that I have seen have the lot listed on them.
“VAERS doesn’t report events due to the vaccine.
And you know it.”
Then why is it called ‘Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)’?
There you go, bringing facts into the argument...
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data [Based on data sampling, 5% of sampled batches associated with high adverse events, contrasted with flu], metmom wrote: |
Is there anywhere where it tells which states? |
I tried to isolate data but it's massive, that's why I think this report sampled the data. Too much to look at.
I tried using the CDC's VAERS but it collapsed whenever I tried to perform searches. I found that the alternative search tool at medalerts worked well. But that displayed a table and I forgot where I went to download the entire bundle.
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
For now I posted the 14,000 line table for Virginia, and the 1,600 line table for DC out in the sticks in the FR outback.
There has to be a better way! Maybe to work the data in Excel on the desktop to make it manageable. Would need to download the datapacket. Not sure I'm the person for the job. Wait! Wait! I should have collected the lot numbers off theExpose article and only searched those to get a decent comparison. Right now, the data is like looking for numbers in Ye Olde Phone Book! Yeah, I really should have gone with some specific lot/manufacturers off theExpose article, which probably means I'd have to type them one at a time! GAH!
Here's Virginia
Covid 'Vaccine' Lot Numbers for Virginia
Here's DC
Covid 'Vaccine' Lot Numbers for DC
Note that each section, e.g., MOderna, starts with the name of the manufacturer and the total number of lot numbers. Then the following lines are specific lot numbers. If the person typed them wrong or left a dash instead of a number, there's a line for it. Those continue until you get to the next manufacturere - with a 'total' header followed by individual lot numbers.
Some VAERS entries don't list lot number or manufacturer, and some don't even say in the expected field what vaccine it's for so there is some garbage data. I always thought that the data is an amazing mess considering the CDC gives itself 6 weeks before uploading a report, if ever, to review it. So they review a report and upload it and then I find there's no formal vaccine classification, but if they read the doctors notes, the CDC could have corrected that.
Except I think the CDC intentionally designed the field requirements to provide buggy missing data.
If anyone else wants to use Medalerts.org to do a better job than I did (e.g., maybe search for specific lot numbers), I put the search terms from the specific sections (1-5) of the template I used at the top of the DC, and Virginia table links (so I'd remember what I did).
Thanks and big bookmark!
Me too.
LOL. Without this data this entire analysis is completely meaningless.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
The obligatory troll post christening any anti-narrative thread ‘meaningless.’
Since it’s meaningless to you, no doubt you’ll run along and let others decide for themselves...oh...wait...
Oh. A quality control problem.
I wonder if the bad batches are 100% gone, or a few remain somewhere for a comparative test against safer ones.
You can't be serious. Do you actually think this analysis tells us anything if we don't know the relative size of the lots?
A few researchers have examined the contents of the vaccines and have found nanotechnology and parasites which became active after the 'vaccine' sample had warmed up under the microscope lights. It's possible 'expired' doses have active nano or parasites. In particular I would think the self-assembling nanotechnology and developing parasites seen under the 'scope would be a significant blood clot issue.
Dr. Carrie Madej: First U.S. Lab Examines “Vaccine” Vials, HORRIFIC [partial transcript and 16 min video. The content is stunning, important-please share]
redvoicemedia.com ^ | September 29, 2021 | Stew Peters, Dr. Carry Madej
Dr John B. @DrJohnB2 (1/n) A microscopy analysis of a Moderna #Covidvaccine sample.A fresh sample was analyzed with bright field and phase contrast microscopy.
twitter.com ^ | October 11, 2021 | Dr John B. @DrJohnB2
Jab: Scientist Discovers Hatching Eggs, Parasites Birthed After Injection (partial transcript, some images from 14 min video, related links)
rumble ^ | October 15, 2021 | Stew Peters, Dr. Jane Ruby, the work of Dr. Zelusky
Dr. John B. - New "Vaccine" Microscope Analysis Photos - Tim Truth (11 min video, new images of 'vaccine' contents)
ugetube.com/watch ^ | October 14, 2021 | Dr. John B.
BANNED & REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE - DR. ZALEWKSI FINDS ANOTHER LIFE FORM IN VAX VIALS (includes some notes and images from 14 minute video)
bitchute.com ^ | October 10th, 2021. | Dr. Franc Zalewski
Perhaps it is not the individual lots, themselves, that are somehow "contaminated" or "more dangerous," but the people who administer the shots?
E.g.: If a lot is sent to Detroit, and Detroit then records a suspiciously high number of adverse reactions - might that not be due to the fact that the shots in Detroit were all administered in WalMart supermarkets, by student-trainees who, just a few years ago, would never have dreamed that they would one day be administering injections? Trainees who have no idea what it means to "aspirate" when injecting?
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
