Skip to comments.
Overturning Roe could mean women seeking abortions have to travel hundreds of miles
CNN ^
| October 30, 2021
| Tierney Sneed and Priya Krishnakumar, CNN
Posted on 10/30/2021 1:21:01 PM PDT by Morgana
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: Morgana
People travel across jurisdictional boundaries in pursuit of many different choices.
41
posted on
10/30/2021 2:06:13 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(My 19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
To: Dusty Road
Some people have to travel hundreds of miles in order to purchase firearms and exercise their Second Amendment rights.
42
posted on
10/30/2021 2:06:14 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
To: Billyv
A USSC decision or federal legislation/constitutional amendment declaring life begins at conception would render pre Roe laws moot.
Absolutely, once the embryo has it’s own DNA it’s
not a part of the mother to dispose as she wishes.
I’m just surprise there are not more legal actions
of the part of fathers, when a woman aborts a fetus
that contains the father’s DNA.
As it stands now a woman can destroy the off spring
of a male at her whim but carry it to term and suddenly
the male is responsible for it.
43
posted on
10/30/2021 2:08:07 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Morgana
Good. It shouldn’t be so easy anyway.
44
posted on
10/30/2021 2:12:59 PM PDT
by
al_c
(Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
To: Morgana
45
posted on
10/30/2021 2:13:32 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Eccl10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: Morgana
“Don’t want one? Don’t make one.”
- Mom
46
posted on
10/30/2021 2:15:07 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(All worry about monsters that'll eat our face, but it's our job to ask WHY it wants to eat our face.)
To: Covenantor
SCOTUS is the #1 thing that ushered us into an oligarchy, ending our representative republic.
47
posted on
10/30/2021 2:22:56 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
To: Revel
Hell is closer than that first step they take on the road to killing their baby.
48
posted on
10/30/2021 2:24:54 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
To: Morgana
or they could just move to a blue state which most red states would prefer they do.
49
posted on
10/30/2021 2:26:25 PM PDT
by
Pollard
(PureBlood)
To: throwthebumsout
"recognized" human life... starting at 6 weeks? So it WAS a human life BEFORE that 6 weeks but the SCOTUS decides to RECOGNIZE it?
It's like "recognizing" a person's in slavery only after he's been a slave for 5 years. Before that, they don't "recognize" it as slavery. Yeah huh.
50
posted on
10/30/2021 2:28:25 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
To: Morgana
Another good reason for secession
51
posted on
10/30/2021 2:29:40 PM PDT
by
faucetman
(Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
To: Morgana
Wasn’t the entire thing about medical privacy in the beginning? Weird how that doesn’t apply to the vaxx issue.
52
posted on
10/30/2021 2:31:15 PM PDT
by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
To: Morgana
And CNN that is what it is going back to because it violates the 10th Amendment. Regulation, Constitutionally belongs to the states.
To: redgolum
Yup. Almost every conservative who made it to SCOTUS since before Bork was Borked, they have been stealth liberals.
I think Clarence Thomas saw the ugliness and stuck to his conservatism. Almost all others have bent their knee to the DC cocktail circuit.
54
posted on
10/30/2021 2:31:54 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
To: reg45
I know I would have to. For instance, here in California, it’s illegal to own a Taurus Judge or S&W Governor.
55
posted on
10/30/2021 2:33:05 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
To: Pollard
Horny women have no trouble traveling hundreds or thousands of miles for sex. But somehow they can’t travel for an abortion? I don’t think so.
56
posted on
10/30/2021 2:33:37 PM PDT
by
lodi90
To: Morgana
they won’t have to travel even one mile if they are responsible to not take chance to get pregnant unwontedly in the first place. (not talking about rape or such).
57
posted on
10/30/2021 2:34:33 PM PDT
by
b4me
(Repeated lies does Not equal TRUTH. )
To: rktman
Obviously it wasn’t “about” privacy. It was about killing an inconvenient result of having sex while they still could.
58
posted on
10/30/2021 2:35:19 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
To: Morgana
“My body my choice.” They never stop. I’m at the point that if the libs want to exterminate their own, I don’t care.
59
posted on
10/30/2021 2:39:19 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: Kevmo
6 weeks matches the Texas abortion law being challenged. SCOTUS rarely rules outside the bounds of the case set before them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson