A USSC decision or federal legislation/constitutional amendment declaring life begins at conception would render pre Roe laws moot.
Absolutely, once the embryo has it’s own DNA it’s
not a part of the mother to dispose as she wishes.
I’m just surprise there are not more legal actions
of the part of fathers, when a woman aborts a fetus
that contains the father’s DNA.
As it stands now a woman can destroy the off spring
of a male at her whim but carry it to term and suddenly
the male is responsible for it.
Unfortunately, some on the pro-life side are callously dismissive of fathers’ natural rights to protect their preborn baby daughters and sons between conception and birth, and would rather the babies die than acknowledge fathers as caring parents by default.