ABOUT US
The Exposé was set up due to a lack of alternatives to the lying mainstream media, and alternatives which report only the facts. Other alternative media sites are happy to publish articles backed up with zero or questionable evidence. Whereas the mainstream media simply refuse to publish the truth or publish half-truths, spun in a way to suit the narrative of the very authorities which are funding them through advertising fees for publishing propaganda.
The Exposé is run by extremely ordinary, hardworking people who are sick and tired of the fear-mongering, lies and propaganda perpetuated by the mainstream media. We felt it was our duty to bring you the facts that the mainstream refuse to, and now here we are.
Ping
Really?
What about those "black eyeball" babies that were walking around after three months?
Was that some "official data"?
Shall I look that trash up?
The official fallback position is that although the vaccines don’t protect from getting or transmitting the virus, they make the illness less severe. I have been told this several times, but never is there anything given to back up the assertion. If that is the position, then the “vaccines” need to be put up against other treatment options (including the “horse paste”) for comparison.
The shots don’t work.
So the vax pushers were wondering when ADE was going to kick in?
**
Andf now we see why the regime is bullying to try and get everyone jabbed. The cover up is melting under the stats of death and dying due to the lies that the jabs give immunity, then the jabs reduce symptoms, then ... well, demon rats lie and people die!
This analysis would be a lot more useful if it gave the total populations for old people who took the shot vs those who didn’t. BBC claims that the jab rate in Scotland for over 55 is near 100% and if true that would mean that a fraction of 1% of the population represents 15% of COVID deaths. Still shows the vaccine’s limitations but kinda puts a different spin on the numbers if true.
The entire world has been screwed by the ChiComs. Slowly coming out. Thank you fauci.
Another great post. Yet the pro vaxxers can’t see the forest for the trees. Proving once again, yet another adverse side effect. The inability to reason and a loss of comprehension.
You post British data while extrapolating that such numbers apply to the USA as a whole. They don’t even match what is happening in Central Virginia for example.
Of course the USA numbers are all over the place depending on the states as well as the political spin in DC.
On the ground from where I work...No Covid sick in our ICU for two days while there were about 20 in the whole hospital. Total covid Numbers going down....85/15 Unvaxxed/vaxxed but vaxxed numbers going up as the vaxxes lose more potency in more people...about what I expected. More vaxxed people I talk to having doubts about boosters and will not take them. (I am familiar with a case of covid contracted a month after pfizer vax but never came to hospital.) No vax mandates yet, I suspect our company is going to “finesse” how they respond to FED issued OSHA mandates and Va has its own OSHA anyway. I think they will offer “weekly” testing and relaxed rules about medical and religious exemptions. They don’t want to lose good Trauma Nurses of child bearing age who want to have babies eventually.
There are the worlds of the BIG NUMBERS and then there are the small slices of the world of numbers that don’t fit all the “Big Numbers’s” parameters.
You keep using Great Britain’s numbers and their conditions are different from the USA....some things may match in terms of percentages and some don’t. The EXPOSE’ site has more than once put out questionable articles from “concerned readers” ...for example one article purporting gloom and doom of the human immune system as millions will die from an AIDS like syndrome by Christmas... by wildly misconstruing even the UK’s own data showing data that only tracks Covid vax immunity decline ...not declines in total immune functions in humans so vaxxed. That is completely irresponsible fear mongering from such a site!
The great mRNA experiment is over. It cannot keep you from infection, it cannot keep you from transmitting, it cannot keep you out of the hospital, it cannot keep you from dying, has an unacceptable number of deaths and injuries and does not last very long. Lastly, it suppresses your natural immune system and we have NO idea of long term effects other than a lifetime of boosters.
EXCLUSIVE:
Is this like the UK version of GP but strictly for covid?
They sure do pump out a lot of articles in a day and you post every single one of them it seems.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not into the vax and will never take it. I also think that some of the vaxxed are having or will have major health issues and I say ‘some’ because I have a sneaking suspicion that ‘some’ people can get by fine with the vax and/OR ‘some’ of the jabs may be saline. Why would they send out saline? Because we are the clinical trial participants and they need a control group. They do have batch numbers and track them in the population. mRNA to this community, saline to that community etc.
*The fact that the fully vaccinated now account for the majority of Covid-19 cases is extremely concerning*
Actually, it’s not. If everyone were vaccinated, there would still be deaths of the weakest.
Looking at table 25, and Oct 15 numbers to be brief, there were 15 deaths in unvaccinated and 117 in vaccinated. But, the 15 deaths is 1/20,000 unvaccinated -5/100K-, versus 1/50,000 -2/100K- vaccinated. Individually it looks higher but as a percentage of each group, there is a significant difference in mortality rate.
Same with table 24 -
ages 60+ is 34/76K vs 320/1.4M - 19x less (76K/1.4M)
ages 30-59 is 51/471K vs 103/1.9M - 4x less (471K/1.9M)
ages 16-29 is 25/328K vs 10/555K - 50% less (328K/555K)
and so on
From a poster on Instapundit open thread just now:
thecoldeye • 2 minutes ago
Kid Pfizer Vaccine Trivia
From FDA Briefing Document page 20 under “Safety”
Due to reactogenicity observed in the initial 4/16 participants assigned to the 30 µg dose
level group after they received both doses of BNT162b2 (Section 3.4.1), an Internal Review Committee decision was made for the remaining 12/16 participants assigned to the 30 µg dose level group to receive
the second dose based upon selection of the dose-level for Phase 2/3 ie, 10 µg. These
subjects will not be discussed further. END QUOTE
If you need a translation, Pfizer spells out what this means in Section 3.4.1: “Systemic events at the
30-µg dose level were deemed unacceptable, leading to the discontinuation of this dose level.” END QUOTE
Coldeye editorial comment: I translate “were deemed unacceptable” to mean “it was so obvious this dose was hurting children, that we changed the protocol mid trial.” I have no problem with any of this. How do we find out what dose to give? One way is to find out how much hurts people and back down from there. Sorry, it’s hard to avoid this kind of bracketing when you’re in a hurry.
Here’s what I object to. The kid trial makes VERY clear that 30 micro is too much. However, in adults, Pfizer gives 30 micro to adults who weigh 300 pounds and adults who weigh 85 pounds. In light of the kid trial, don’t you think Pfizer should be asked to re examine the 30 micro dose in 85 pound adults?
“Pass thy seed through.....”
CRISPR
The Days of Noah
Gen. 6
Matt. 24
Steuben County reports three new COVID-19 deaths
Then note how the deaths are described...
...passed away who had previously tested positive for COVID-19...
and
...COVID related deaths...
At this point I'm show me the medical records and death certificates or just shut the hell up.