EXCLUSIVE – 85% of Covid-19 Deaths & 75% of Hospitalisations were among the Fully Vaccinated in the last month according to the latest Public Health data

theexpose.uk ^ | 10/28/2021 | THE EXPOSÉ

[ransomnote]

ransomnote: The Expose (UK) analyzes official data releases - I'll put their 'about us' in Post #1. Also, the following link includes excellent Covid resources for both vaxxed and unvaxxed.

NEW COMPREHENISVE COVID WEBSITE: EARLY COVID CARE EXPERTS (ECCE) includes treatments, finding a doctor, minimizing the effects of Covid 'vaccines' Dr. McCullough, Dr. Zelenko et. al.

The latest official Public Health data shows that the fully vaccinated accounted for 85% of Covid-19 deaths in the past four weeks, whilst also accounting for 75% of Covid-19 hospitalisations and 61% of alleged Covid-19 cases from September 25th through to October 22nd.

The Covid-19 Statistical Report is a weekly report on Covid-19 data published by Public Health Scotland, and the latest update published October 27th confirms that things are getting worse for the fully vaccinated population by the week whilst things improve for the not-vaccinated population.

Table 23 of the report confirms that the majority of Covid-19 cases were among the fully vaccinated population in the week beginning October 16th 2021, accounting for 10,992 cases. Whilst the not-vaccinated population accounted for just over half the amount, recording 5,756 cases.

The totals number of cases by vaccination status as confirmed by the above table between September 25th and October 22nd 2021 were as follows –

• Not-vaccinated population = 27,511 cases
• Partly vaccinated population = 3,621 cases
• Fully-vaccinated population = 38,474 cases

This means the vaccinated population accounted for 61% of Covid-19 cases between September 25th and October 22nd, whilst the not-vaccinated population accounted for 39%.

However, the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated gets much worse when it comes to hospitalisations, with the fully vaccinated now accounting for the majority of Covid-19 hospitalisations since at least July 2021.

The above table shows that the not-vaccinated over-60’s accounted for just 10% of Covid-19 hospitalisations between September 25th and October 22nd, whilst the vaccinated over 60’s accounted for 90%.

A similar trend can also be seen in the 30 to 59 year-old age group with the not-vaccinated accounting for just 33% of Covid-19 hospitalisations, whilst the vaccinated accounted for 67%.

The totals number of hospitalisations by vaccination status for all age groups between September 25th and October 22nd 2021 as confirmed by table 24 of the PHS report were as follows –

• Not-vaccinated population = 584
• Partly vaccinated population = 81
• Fully vaccinated population = 1672

This means the vaccinated population accounted for 75% of Covid-19 hospitalisations between September 25th and October 22nd 2021, whilst the not-vaccinated accounted for just 25%.

But yet again the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated gets much worse when it comes to deaths allegedly related to Covid-19.

The totals number of alleged Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status between September 18th and October 15th 2021 as confirmed by table 25 of the PHS report were as follows –

• Not-vaccinated population = 85 deaths
• Partly vaccinated population = 17 deaths
• Fully vaccinated population = 457 deaths

This means the vaccinated population accounted for 85% of Covid-19 deaths between September 18th and October 15th, whilst the not-vaccinated accounted for just 15%.

The fact that the fully vaccinated now account for the majority of Covid-19 cases is extremely concerning in regards to the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections, because up until recently, children; who are not eligibe for vaccination, have accounted for the vast majority of cases.

Further questions on the effectiveness of the jabs also need to be asked due to the fact Covid-19 hospitalisations and deaths are rising among the fully vaccinated population by the week whilst hospitalisations and deaths among the not-vaccinated population continue to decline.

 

[blueplum]

*The fact that the fully vaccinated now account for the majority of Covid-19 cases is extremely concerning*

Actually, it’s not. If everyone were vaccinated, there would still be deaths of the weakest.

Looking at table 25, and Oct 15 numbers to be brief, there were 15 deaths in unvaccinated and 117 in vaccinated. But, the 15 deaths is 1/20,000 unvaccinated -5/100K-, versus 1/50,000 -2/100K- vaccinated. Individually it looks higher but as a percentage of each group, there is a significant difference in mortality rate.

Same with table 24 -
ages 60+ is 34/76K vs 320/1.4M - 19x less (76K/1.4M)
ages 30-59 is 51/471K vs 103/1.9M - 4x less (471K/1.9M)
ages 16-29 is 25/328K vs 10/555K - 50% less (328K/555K)
and so on

[ransomnote]

blueplum wrote:

*The fact that the fully vaccinated now account for the majority of Covid-19 cases is extremely concerning*

Actually, it’s not. If everyone were vaccinated, there would still be deaths of the weakest.

Looking at table 25, and Oct 15 numbers to be brief, there were 15 deaths in unvaccinated and 117 in vaccinated. But, the 15 deaths is 1/20,000 unvaccinated -5/100K-, versus 1/50,000 -2/100K- vaccinated. Individually it looks higher but as a percentage of each group, there is a significant difference in mortality rate.

Same with table 24 -
ages 60+ is 34/76K vs 320/1.4M - 19x less (76K/1.4M)
ages 30-59 is 51/471K vs 103/1.9M - 4x less (471K/1.9M)
ages 16-29 is 25/328K vs 10/555K - 50% less (328K/555K)
and so on

Most of the people who die from the 'vaccine' are counted as unvacinaed deaths. They use rather manipulative, arbitrary rules to determine who is unvaxxed.

Please recall the PCR 'Covid' test does not diagnose covid, but instead diagnoses some unknown collection of illnesses. Below I'll put the most recent of several articles on FR about this issue.

MUST SEE VIDEO: Dr. Kevin Corbett, “The WHO is running the NHS in the United Kingdom” (as titled on website)
theexpose.uk ^ | 10/28/2021 | The Expose, Dr. Kevin Corbett

Posted on 10/28/2021, 1:56:29 PM by ransomnote

“The W.H.O. admitted that they developed the [PCR] test based on in silico modelled genetic sequence; not a real element taken from patients. That’s true. That’s NOT a conspiracy theory. That’s the truth,” said Dr. Kevin P. Corbett. 

Note that the current report also specifies vaccine 'performance' against 'variants' but they have no test for variants either.

The Plandemic data officially released is so heavily manipulated that by the time the data begins to publicly expose them despite their best totalitarian efforts, it matters. If you keep in mind all the lies they've already been caught in - the data is not good.

If you pretend all the data is valid, the playing field is even, the 99.9% treatable illness is lethal like Ebola, and pretend there are no treatments, and a few other mass deceptions, maybe the report looks good to those who can maintain the delusion.

I look at the games they play with 'vaccination status' and 'patient count' and think they are silly because that country is making it mandatory to have proof of vaccination everywhere they go - but if hospitalized, the 'record keeping' becomes either blind or redundant.

I stopped posting excerpts (below)  because context matters but initially I began exerpting. For example, on page 85 if your CHI number is missing then they 'can't pull your vaccination record'. Yeah, that happens alot. Sometimes UK data has 7000 unknown admissions and the actual breakdown of vaxxed/unvaxxed is based on the 1300 patients for which they DO have vaccination records.

Page 85: 

R. If an individual tests positive more than once, the repeat positive PCR test is only counted if the positive PCR test is more than 90 days apart. Records with missing CHI numbers are excluded as these data cannot be linked to vaccination status.

Page 86:

If the patient has been transferred to another hospital during treatment, each transfer will create a new admission record. Therefore, there may be multiple admissions for a single
patient if they have moved between locations during a continuous inpatient stay (CIS), or if they have been admitted to hospital on separate occasions.
COVID-19 related acute hospital admissions have been identified as the following: An individual that has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR:
• Up to 14 days prior to hospital admission
• On the day of, or day following admission (if no discharge date is available)
• In between hospital admission and discharge (if there is a valid discharge date available).

Page 87 (ransomnote: I think they are hiding something specific here, but I am not sure what.)
Where an individual has more than one PCR positive test, positive results are only included for the first PCR positive test associated with a hospitalisation, or if the positive PCR test is
more than 90 days after the previous PCR positive test that was eligible for inclusion. 

Page 87:

"A confirmed COVID-19 related death is defined as an individual who has tested positive by PCR for SARS-CoV-2 at any time point and has COVID-19 listed as a underlying or contributory cause of death on the death certificate. Vaccine status is determined at time of most recent specimen date."

 

[blueplum]

Hi ransomnote.

*Most of the people who die from the ‘vaccine’ are counted as unvacinaed deaths. They use rather manipulative, arbitrary rules to determine who is unvaxxed.*

well, let me ask you. How many days do you need to take an antibiotic for strep throat before it works? 2 - 3? maybe 6 or 7 for a bad infection and you take the antibiotic for the entire 12 or 14 days to make sure the infection is gone? Why would a vaccine be any different than the natural immune system? What are the dangers of shocking the immune system into hyperdrive as opposed to coaxing the immune system?

Here’s a March 2021 article you might remember, about a month after vaccines were being distributed for real. Pfitzer only. So, it’s never been a surprise that a person isn’t fully protected until after the second shot - and is why people were told to continue behavior modification in between shots. (which, obviously some didn’t, and in other high-risk folks, 50% wasn’t enough)

Here’s the paragraph, and a link if you want to go wading thru verbage:
“ The study was not designed to assess the efficacy of a single-dose regimen. Nevertheless, in the interval between the first and second doses, the observed vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was 52%, and in the first 7 days after dose 2, it was 91%, reaching full efficacy against disease with onset at least 7 days after dose 2. “
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

[blueplum]

to your second comment:
“Please recall the PCR ‘Covid’ test does not diagnose covid, but instead diagnoses some unknown collection of illnesses.”

Depends on when you want to start timing. CDC couldn’t even get the right reagents to the right state. So I’ll give you half a point on that. However, captains of industry kicked into gear by President Trump and, voila, we got PCR tests - including the one developed right here in SoCal.

BUT
I’d say be very very careful how you tread pursuing this argument. PCR tests, ‘getting tested’ is the same exact test being proposed by the unvaccinated as an alternative to vaccination.

IF you discredit PCR tests, you’re discrediting the ONLY tool the unvaccinated have. Kind of shooting yourself in the foot, yes?

Https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/pcr-test-recall-can-the-test-tell-the-difference-between-covid-19-and-the-flu

[grey_whiskers]

From a poster on Instapundit open thread just now:

thecoldeye • 2 minutes ago
Kid Pfizer Vaccine Trivia

From FDA Briefing Document page 20 under “Safety”

Due to reactogenicity observed in the initial 4/16 participants assigned to the 30 µg dose
level group after they received both doses of BNT162b2 (Section 3.4.1), an Internal Review Committee decision was made for the remaining 12/16 participants assigned to the 30 µg dose level group to receive
the second dose based upon selection of the dose-level for Phase 2/3 ie, 10 µg. These
subjects will not be discussed further. END QUOTE

If you need a translation, Pfizer spells out what this means in Section 3.4.1: “Systemic events at the
30-µg dose level were deemed unacceptable, leading to the discontinuation of this dose level.” END QUOTE

Coldeye editorial comment: I translate “were deemed unacceptable” to mean “it was so obvious this dose was hurting children, that we changed the protocol mid trial.” I have no problem with any of this. How do we find out what dose to give? One way is to find out how much hurts people and back down from there. Sorry, it’s hard to avoid this kind of bracketing when you’re in a hurry.

Here’s what I object to. The kid trial makes VERY clear that 30 micro is too much. However, in adults, Pfizer gives 30 micro to adults who weigh 300 pounds and adults who weigh 85 pounds. In light of the kid trial, don’t you think Pfizer should be asked to re examine the 30 micro dose in 85 pound adults?

[Pelham]

+1

[ransomnote]

blueplum wrote:

to your second comment:
“Please recall the PCR ‘Covid’ test does not diagnose covid, but instead diagnoses some unknown collection of illnesses.”

Depends on when you want to start timing. CDC couldn’t even get the right reagents to the right state. So I’ll give you half a point on that. However, captains of industry kicked into gear by President Trump and, voila, we got PCR tests - including the one developed right here in SoCal.

BUT
I’d say be very very careful how you tread pursuing this argument. PCR tests, ‘getting tested’ is the same exact test being proposed by the unvaccinated as an alternative to vaccination.

IF you discredit PCR tests, you’re discrediting the ONLY tool the unvaccinated have. Kind of shooting yourself in the foot, yes?

Https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/pcr-test-recall-can-the-test-tell-the-difference-between-covid-19-and-the-flu

My my my. What an evil, creepy, amoral argument you propose.

I shouldn't decry a fake test used to destroy the economy, businses, psychological health and freedom around the world, or else it'll get worse? HOW can it get worse? They are killing countries and people with a fake plandemic based on a fake test.

One FAKE PCR ‘Test’ to rule us all. How the CDC/FDA/NIH and World Health Organization made themselves gods.
8/25/2021 | vanity

You are wrong, of course. The PCR 'tests' are not the ONLY tool the unvaccinated have. 

God, each other, and non-compliance are weapons that defeat the fake PCR and monsters like you.

It's not just the economy, the borders, the mandates, election fraud, or dementia. It's EVERYTHING. Refuse to Comply With Tyranny, Or Die -These are our choices.

YOU THINK YOU CAN BACK ME DOWN AND SILENCE ME?!

[grey_whiskers]

Use the Brave browser, and choose “open new Private Window with Tor”.
Then type in the URL.

What is your source for the accusation that the website shares your information (*what*) information with facebook, etc.?

[Varsity Flight]

“Pass thy seed through.....”

CRISPR

The Days of Noah
Gen. 6
Matt. 24

[ransomnote]

So, it’s never been a surprise that a person isn’t fully protected 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It's never been a surprise they are bioweapons. I called it back when they were fanning fake panic. Remember when China was trying to get an Ebola panic going, and he MSM jumped onboard. I figured out the real bioweapon was not the 'outbreak' we were seeing but was instead the 'vaccines' headed our way.

Let's set aside the part where the vaccines were performing their intended task as bioweapons by killing some upon injection and too many within the first 14 day of injection.

"Fully" protected is arbitrary. The 'partial' protection they theoretically proposed should also help to reduce the illness stats, but instead ZERO improvement was counted during that phase. They don't work to protect or improve health, of course, but ignoring partial protection is just one more cut in a 1000 cuts delivered to the accuracy of the fabricated 'efficacy' stats.

[blueplum]

Those that shoot the PCR test out of the water can’t turn around in the next sentence and then claim it’s all good for admission.

I”m sorry pointing that out angers you into bold caps but it’s reality on the ground.

Now you can discard the junk science that PCR tests aren’t valid and suppoort PCR testing as a way for the unvaccinated to keep their jobs, or you can defeat them and take away the only thing that might keep them in their jobs. Your choice. Speaking of amoral over egoism.

[blueplum]

China lost the race on ebola; we have 2 approved and six more in the pipeline, including mRna vaccines.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29281112/

” The ‘partial’ protection they theoretically proposed should also help to reduce the illness stats, but instead ZERO improvement was counted during that phase. They don’t work to protect or improve health, “

zero improvement? The improvement is in the lives not lost. At the start of the pandemic if you recall, we were seeing 40-80% mortality rates and stacked corpses in refrigerator trucks. With a slower replicating virus.

Now, if you ever find a vaccine that ‘improves’ health, let me know. Maybe I can get a wrinkles vaccine, yeah? ;)

Vaccines are to prevent or mitigate damage. The vaccine, developed for Wuhan Original REcipe is about as close to 100% prevent in a mixed population of various lifestyles/preexistings as you can get. The same vaccine against a subsequent variant in the same hodge-podge population is challenged, but still holds the castle walls. And people are complaining? When the walls crumble, get back to me.

Sure seems to be a whole lot of perfect people who do everything 100% perfect themselves to be so judgy judgy about a vaccine that has an overall 90%plus successs rate against asevere, physiologically damaging, disease in an ethnically and age variable population.

[blueplum]

thanks for the conversation and I’ll let you have the last word

[bagster]

Supposedly a ‘conservative’ website - every time you visit they share your information with facebook, google, stripe and paypal - 4 extreme left wing corporations - do yourself a favor, and avoid at all costs.

Link please. Your opinions aren't known for their credibility.

[bagster]

Seat belts don’t work either - I know someone who was in a car accident and died and they had their seat belt on.

Still with the seatbelt analogy? You might have a point if wearing a seatbelt was in any way similar to taking a vaccine.

But its not, so you don't.

#FailedAnalogy#188

[bagster]

Oops.. my bad.

What else is new, bumpkin?

If you're ever right about anything, I'll let you know.

[bagster]

Yes, and when 100% of people are vaccinated, 100% of covid deaths will be vaccinated - did you miss math class?

What I hear you saying is, the vaccines don't work.

Amirite?

Follow up question: Why would there be any covid deaths if 100% of the people were vaccinated and the vaccines actually vaccinated?

Sidenote: There will never be a time when 100% of the people are vaccinated. There are far too many smart people in the world.

#PurebloodsRule

[bagster]

Please post the link where drug companies claimed that if you get vaccinated you will never die.

I think you're finally right about something. I'm pretty sure the drug companies never claimed their product would make people immortal.

But they did claim it would keep you from catching the covid, then after that was disproven, that it would prevent you from being hospitalized with a severe case and/or dying.

Now we see that too was booshito to the tenth degree.

But you still refuse to see the truth. Why?

[bagster]

DOn’t bother, the website is CRAP - they send your data to facebook, google, paypal and stripe each time you visit - it is not a research website, it is a click-bait advertising website whose sole purpose is to get advertising dollars.

Let's say that's true. Which it isn't until you prove it is. How does who they send data to in any way related to the veracity of their stories?

You're flailing, dude.

#KillTheMessenger

[bagster]

Thats especially important if you run a click-bait website like ‘theexpose.uk’ who shares your data with facebook and google each time you visit....does that sound like a conservative website to you? or a website that is selling your data to big leftists corporations?

Is there some reason you don't even attempt to refute the data in their articles, and just kvetch about selling data to Facebook?

Maybe its not a 'conservative' site. Maybe its a 'truth' site. And maybe you have a problem with the truth.

Why?