Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum
blueplum wrote:

*The fact that the fully vaccinated now account for the majority of Covid-19 cases is extremely concerning*

Actually, it’s not. If everyone were vaccinated, there would still be deaths of the weakest.

Looking at table 25, and Oct 15 numbers to be brief, there were 15 deaths in unvaccinated and 117 in vaccinated. But, the 15 deaths is 1/20,000 unvaccinated -5/100K-, versus 1/50,000 -2/100K- vaccinated. Individually it looks higher but as a percentage of each group, there is a significant difference in mortality rate.

Same with table 24 -
ages 60+ is 34/76K vs 320/1.4M - 19x less (76K/1.4M)
ages 30-59 is 51/471K vs 103/1.9M - 4x less (471K/1.9M)
ages 16-29 is 25/328K vs 10/555K - 50% less (328K/555K)
and so on

Most of the people who die from the 'vaccine' are counted as unvacinaed deaths. They use rather manipulative, arbitrary rules to determine who is unvaxxed.

Please recall the PCR 'Covid' test does not diagnose covid, but instead diagnoses some unknown collection of illnesses. Below I'll put the most recent of several articles on FR about this issue.

MUST SEE VIDEO: Dr. Kevin Corbett, “The WHO is running the NHS in the United Kingdom” (as titled on website)
theexpose.uk ^ | 10/28/2021 | The Expose, Dr. Kevin Corbett

Posted on 10/28/2021, 1:56:29 PM by ransomnote

“The W.H.O. admitted that they developed the [PCR] test based on in silico modelled genetic sequence; not a real element taken from patients. That’s true. That’s NOT a conspiracy theory. That’s the truth,” said Dr. Kevin P. Corbett. 

Note that the current report also specifies vaccine 'performance' against 'variants' but they have no test for variants either.

The Plandemic data officially released is so heavily manipulated that by the time the data begins to publicly expose them despite their best totalitarian efforts, it matters. If you keep in mind all the lies they've already been caught in - the data is not good.

If you pretend all the data is valid, the playing field is even, the 99.9% treatable illness is lethal like Ebola, and pretend there are no treatments, and a few other mass deceptions, maybe the report looks good to those who can maintain the delusion.

I look at the games they play with 'vaccination status' and 'patient count' and think they are silly because that country is making it mandatory to have proof of vaccination everywhere they go - but if hospitalized, the 'record keeping' becomes either blind or redundant.

I stopped posting excerpts (below)  because context matters but initially I began exerpting. For example, on page 85 if your CHI number is missing then they 'can't pull your vaccination record'. Yeah, that happens alot. Sometimes UK data has 7000 unknown admissions and the actual breakdown of vaxxed/unvaxxed is based on the 1300 patients for which they DO have vaccination records.

Page 85: 

R. If an individual tests positive more than once, the repeat positive PCR test is only counted if the positive PCR test is more than 90 days apart. Records with missing CHI numbers are excluded as these data cannot be linked to vaccination status.

Page 86:

If the patient has been transferred to another hospital during treatment, each transfer will create a new admission record. Therefore, there may be multiple admissions for a single
patient if they have moved between locations during a continuous inpatient stay (CIS), or if they have been admitted to hospital on separate occasions.
COVID-19 related acute hospital admissions have been identified as the following: An individual that has tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR:
• Up to 14 days prior to hospital admission
• On the day of, or day following admission (if no discharge date is available)
• In between hospital admission and discharge (if there is a valid discharge date available).

Page 87 (ransomnote: I think they are hiding something specific here, but I am not sure what.)
Where an individual has more than one PCR positive test, positive results are only included for the first PCR positive test associated with a hospitalisation, or if the positive PCR test is
more than 90 days after the previous PCR positive test that was eligible for inclusion. 

Page 87:

"A confirmed COVID-19 related death is defined as an individual who has tested positive by PCR for SARS-CoV-2 at any time point and has COVID-19 listed as a underlying or contributory cause of death on the death certificate. Vaccine status is determined at time of most recent specimen date."

 


102 posted on 10/28/2021 7:13:38 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Hi ransomnote.

*Most of the people who die from the ‘vaccine’ are counted as unvacinaed deaths. They use rather manipulative, arbitrary rules to determine who is unvaxxed.*

well, let me ask you. How many days do you need to take an antibiotic for strep throat before it works? 2 - 3? maybe 6 or 7 for a bad infection and you take the antibiotic for the entire 12 or 14 days to make sure the infection is gone? Why would a vaccine be any different than the natural immune system? What are the dangers of shocking the immune system into hyperdrive as opposed to coaxing the immune system?

Here’s a March 2021 article you might remember, about a month after vaccines were being distributed for real. Pfitzer only. So, it’s never been a surprise that a person isn’t fully protected until after the second shot - and is why people were told to continue behavior modification in between shots. (which, obviously some didn’t, and in other high-risk folks, 50% wasn’t enough)

Here’s the paragraph, and a link if you want to go wading thru verbage:
“ The study was not designed to assess the efficacy of a single-dose regimen. Nevertheless, in the interval between the first and second doses, the observed vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was 52%, and in the first 7 days after dose 2, it was 91%, reaching full efficacy against disease with onset at least 7 days after dose 2. “
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577


103 posted on 10/28/2021 7:44:57 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

to your second comment:
“Please recall the PCR ‘Covid’ test does not diagnose covid, but instead diagnoses some unknown collection of illnesses.”

Depends on when you want to start timing. CDC couldn’t even get the right reagents to the right state. So I’ll give you half a point on that. However, captains of industry kicked into gear by President Trump and, voila, we got PCR tests - including the one developed right here in SoCal.

BUT
I’d say be very very careful how you tread pursuing this argument. PCR tests, ‘getting tested’ is the same exact test being proposed by the unvaccinated as an alternative to vaccination.

IF you discredit PCR tests, you’re discrediting the ONLY tool the unvaccinated have. Kind of shooting yourself in the foot, yes?

Https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/pcr-test-recall-can-the-test-tell-the-difference-between-covid-19-and-the-flu


104 posted on 10/28/2021 8:22:18 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson