Posted on 10/27/2021 9:57:58 PM PDT by RandFan
Dr. Vladimir Zev Zelenko
@DrZevZelenko
I am a conspiracy realist, part 1:
Vanguard and Black Rock are stake holders in all industry, media, academia, and politics.
Vanguard and Black Rock invest in each other through something called circular ownership.
Thus, consider Vanguard and Black Rock as a monopoly that owns everything.
With due diligence you will discover that the major stake holders of this monopoly are
-Rothschild family
-Du Pont family
-Rockefeller family
-Carnegie family
-Orsini Family
-American Bush family
-British Royal family
They use the following foundations to ferment chaos around the world
Bill and Melinda Gates foundation
Soros Open Society foundation
Clinton foundation
These foundations are instrumental for geopolitical destabilization.
I am a conspiracy realist, part 2:
Chaos is good for business and power acquisition.
Only a divinely inspired force can overcome this Goliath.
The world will be redeemed by acts of goodness and kindness.
We need collective divine consciousness in order to merit divine intervention.
The owners of the vanguard/black rock monopoly are a manifestation of the primordial serpent.
I am VERY optimistic about an upcoming redemptive event that will rebalance our dark world.
Fasten your seatbelts and enjoy the ride.
Vladimir Zev Zelenko MD .
See post 40.
Funny, I was just thinking that if someone told me 2 years ago what would be occurring today, I would have thought him nuts. But the nuttiness is happening now: our connivance in a Chinese bioweapon; democrat electoral coup d'etat; "re-education" concentration camps in Australia; wide-open borders; vaccine passports; masks to stop a virus; medical system politicized and totalitarian. Nuts. All of it And the list is a lot longer.
I forgot to add: a demented moron as our commander in chief; a transgender 4-star admiral. Nuts.
Thanks for posting this article, my FRiend!
Went to Gettr and am now following Dr. Zelenko.
Where did you find the text of your posted article? Clicking on the link to Gettr doesn’t take me to the referenced text. Can you provide a better link?
Thanks!
He called for sticking people’s heads in boxes and letting small bugs eat them while puppies yapped. However crazy reality is right now, that kind of vivid, imaginative vindictiveness for people who experiment on puppies is uncalled for. Science sometimes requires a little harm to cute little beasties. How warranted it is depends on the benefit envisioned, and a medical doctor such as Zelenko has probably done a few vivisections of frogs or whatnot during his training and/or research. He may be partial to puppies, but creative torture of their tormentors sounds...unhinged.
Thanks! I just didn’t scroll down far enough.
I think Zelenko was being a little bit tongue in cheek with that comment.
*
He’s also said that the vaccines are designed to commit genocide.
IMHO, the vaccines have done some good, but they’re not all the Brandon administration says they are. They are concealing information about adverse effects, and they are using it as a political tool. But the adverse effects that there are, while underreported, are not enough to destroy an entire race or nation.
On the contrary, the Israeli study that establishes natural immunity as being much more effective than vaccines also finds the vaccines effective in reducing infections, just not to the extent that they’ve been hyped.
But not no way not no how are vaccines a tool of genocide. Believing so is symptomatic of paranoia imho. Which does not mean that Zelenko’s Hydroxichloroquin protocol is not a safe, easy way to stop covid early. Which is exactly why the leftards are so adamantly against it. They want to exploit this “pandemic” for absolute power. And a cheap, easy solution would ruin that. This is not paranoia, but observable.
True, people who want absolute power do tend to commit genocide pretty often. But not with vaccines.
He may well be right about this. You and I don't know the longer term effects of these shots. The ones who may know are certainly not telling us. The same folks who are actively promoting vaccinating the world (Gates said 7 billion people) are the same ones who have been advocating population reduction for many years now.
Is it simply drug company profits? Or is there another motivation for the crazed insistence that everybody submit to these injections? It certainly has nothing to do with health.
So far the vaccines have killed a lot of people, many more than the VAERS has recorded. Maybe millions throughout the world. Could this be an attempted genocide? It's not crazy to ask these questions.
One thing I have learned these past two years is that organized evil does exist in the world. Do they want to reduce the population of "useless eaters?" We cannot close our minds to such notions anymore.
“The same folks who are actively promoting vaccinating the world (Gates said 7 billion people) are the same ones who have been advocating population reduction for many years now.”
This is nonsensical logic. What if the CEO of Nabisco wants to reduce the population of the world. Is shredded wheat a plot for genocide. Is asking a question a dishonest way of making an allegation without proof?
If you want to reduce the population of the world, you starve everyone or you start a war. You don’t spend billions on developing a vaccine using the latest science and exerting Herculean efforts to push it through the bureaucracy.
“You and I don’t know the longer term effects of these shots. The ones who may know are certainly not telling us. “
Nobody knows the longer term effects of these shots, because they’ve been around for only a short term. They were double-blind tested on a large study group, I think it was 30,000 of study and control, respectively.
“So far the vaccines have killed a lot of people, many more than the VAERS has recorded. Maybe millions throughout the world. Could this be an attempted genocide? It’s not crazy to ask these questions.”
Uh, yes it is. Because it’s speculation. Because you stop short of saying that Trump is in on it because you don’t want to believe that of him because that’s inconsistent with your agenda. This is narrative. Form a conclusion tailored to an agenda based on a paradigm. The leftards do this all the time, and now you’re doing it.
“We cannot close our minds to such notions anymore.”
It has not been disproven, therefore it can be true, and therefore we must assume it is true. Switch the hypothesis to Russia Russia Russia or global warming, and you sound like Jim Acosta. Please get some perspective.
What?
He’s not allowed to have an opinion in your world?
Why is it a problem for you that you immediately presume some nefarious reason for a descriptive comment?
RandFan did nothing wrong nor anti-Semetic.
The fact that you read so much into it when there was nothing implied tells us more about you than RF. IT’s called “projecting”.
You’re projecting, too.
The comment about him being Jewish may have been irrelevant, but it was NOT “anti-semetic”.
Exactly.
It’s not Herculean efforts to push a vax through when so many in the government are for it.
And so nobody has used vaxxes before, So what? There’s always a first time and just for the record, vaccines are fairly new on the medical radar, certainly new enough that even the 20th century despots could not have used them.
And why not use them? It will reduce the population without the messiness and destruction of so much infrastructure that a bombing war would cause.
The fact adding the "Jewish" tag was irrelevant without any substantive reason is indicative of anti-Semitism.
Projection?
Disappointing you're defending an anti-Semite - please remove me from your ping list.
The good doctor posting on this does sound a bit like a finance guy might when spreading medical insights: There is significant truth to the gist of what he says, but vague and unsubstantiated overstatement mars his message.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.