He may well be right about this. You and I don't know the longer term effects of these shots. The ones who may know are certainly not telling us. The same folks who are actively promoting vaccinating the world (Gates said 7 billion people) are the same ones who have been advocating population reduction for many years now.
Is it simply drug company profits? Or is there another motivation for the crazed insistence that everybody submit to these injections? It certainly has nothing to do with health.
So far the vaccines have killed a lot of people, many more than the VAERS has recorded. Maybe millions throughout the world. Could this be an attempted genocide? It's not crazy to ask these questions.
One thing I have learned these past two years is that organized evil does exist in the world. Do they want to reduce the population of "useless eaters?" We cannot close our minds to such notions anymore.
“The same folks who are actively promoting vaccinating the world (Gates said 7 billion people) are the same ones who have been advocating population reduction for many years now.”
This is nonsensical logic. What if the CEO of Nabisco wants to reduce the population of the world. Is shredded wheat a plot for genocide. Is asking a question a dishonest way of making an allegation without proof?
If you want to reduce the population of the world, you starve everyone or you start a war. You don’t spend billions on developing a vaccine using the latest science and exerting Herculean efforts to push it through the bureaucracy.
“You and I don’t know the longer term effects of these shots. The ones who may know are certainly not telling us. “
Nobody knows the longer term effects of these shots, because they’ve been around for only a short term. They were double-blind tested on a large study group, I think it was 30,000 of study and control, respectively.
“So far the vaccines have killed a lot of people, many more than the VAERS has recorded. Maybe millions throughout the world. Could this be an attempted genocide? It’s not crazy to ask these questions.”
Uh, yes it is. Because it’s speculation. Because you stop short of saying that Trump is in on it because you don’t want to believe that of him because that’s inconsistent with your agenda. This is narrative. Form a conclusion tailored to an agenda based on a paradigm. The leftards do this all the time, and now you’re doing it.
“We cannot close our minds to such notions anymore.”
It has not been disproven, therefore it can be true, and therefore we must assume it is true. Switch the hypothesis to Russia Russia Russia or global warming, and you sound like Jim Acosta. Please get some perspective.