Posted on 10/22/2021 8:46:31 AM PDT by Red Badger
My bet is that the wireless phones people have connected to their landlines in their house give off a lot more electromagnetic radiation than a cell phone does.
Great tag...
Oh great. Establishing a report line will only bring out the ambulance chasers. This only adds to the thousands of moochers are going to be blaming cell phones for every odd headache and demanding millions of free $.
Just call Morgan & Morgan..........................
I’ve been waiting 30 years for this report.
Been through 8 phones and 1 brain.
Get back with me in 30 more years.
A 40-Year-Old Man With Painful, Rupturing Lesions
A 40-year-old man presents with a 20-year history of recurrent painful nodules on his bilateral buttocks, gluteal cleft, and medial aspect of his upper thighs. The lesions often spontaneously rupture and result in sinus tracts or scarring
The one held against your head is the culprit, not the twenty feet away.
You hold them against your head when you talk on them.
I forgot to add, the cell phone has a five watt transmitter. The wireless phone has a .03 watt transmitter.
I wonder how many mice and other animals have been exposed to the frequencies used in transmissions.
Frequencies below ultraviolet, x-rays, cosmic rays do not bust up molecules which leads to cancer.
The cellular phone frequencies are way, way, way below ultraviolet. They’re below visible light, infrared, microwaves.
The highest frequency involved in cellphone communication is that of the carrier wave. The carrier wave is “modulated” to make it contain the information that is sent.
For instance, if you tune to a 103.9 FM radio station, the 103.9 is the carrier frequency. The audio is added to it resulting in a group of frequencies all very close to 103.9.
Digital information is added to a carrier also, but the carrier is still an analog signal (a near sine wave) with a small frequency spread.
Thus I don’t see how digital information conveyed on a carrier wave is going to produce high frequency signals that are known to be damaging.
Getting back to the research described, what about mice being subjected to strong sub-ultraviolet radiation. Has that not been done? I’m sure it has, and have we heard of the mice having ill effects? Not me.
Did he put his phone against his butt when he talked? My older brother used to do that, in a way, for special effects.
Radio effects below UV seem to be related only to tissue heating. Maybe there is something else happening with the shorter wavelengths that have yet to be identified. I do recall that an antenna must be somewhere around 1/4 wavelength in order pick up a signal; otherwise, the wave just passes by.
bookmark
He must have.
Can anyone condense this study’s 4,415-word conclusion into a sentence or two? I have other things to do today!
Conclusion:
It needs more grant money................
They still don’t know for sure.
Together you have provided a concise, completely accurate condensed version of this study's conclusions.
Just as are the "conclusions" of so many government-funded studies, these are not "conclusions" ... not really.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.