[SeekAndFind]

When asked if Borody had declared his intentions to patent the therapy, or made them aware once it was filed, a spokesperson for Hunt told Guardian Australia: “We are not aware of Prof Borody’s private interests and to the best of our knowledge have no record of having received any such declaration.”

Borody has been lobbying the federal government for more than a year to support the treatment, both before and after the filing of the patent.

[datura]

Well, he can’t patent Ivermectin used with zinc and quercetin.

There really isn’t much need of the antibiotic.

[ransomnote]

The FDA and the NIH formally allow their scientists to develop drugs with tax payer money and then personally patent them and profit from them without compensating tax payers.

Anthony Fauci knew Remdesivir was too damaging to use on anyone because he was trialing a drug in Africa and Remdesivir AND fauci’s drugs were removed from the trial because they were too damaging. So if it’s FINE for Fauci to trial and patent drugs, fine for the CDC to hold numerous patents and function like a drug company, FINE for the FDA to be in bed with pharma and patent drugs on taxpayer money, I don’t see how it’s suspicious if a private citizen does it.

[Cold Heart]

OK, I read the last sentence in the article that he should apply for funds for Ivermectin studies under Climate Trial.

He probably could if he worded it right.

[monkeyshine]

I wish him well, and I wish him good bankruptcy attorneys.
The only good thing is he already lives in a penal colony.

[Hostage]

Good grief, Dr. Zelenko in NY has been prescribing HCQ, Zinc, zPak since practically the beginning of the plandemic.

How the USPTO would approve a patent of three widely available off-patent ingredients is a mystery. Something isn’t right and that’s usually the case when the source is the Guardian who are rabid leftists.

I have IVM in tablet form, I have Zn in tablet form too. I would need a a prescription for Doxycycline. Nothing stopping anyone from following a regimen of these things together.

I fail to see how a patent would stop people from getting the individual ingredients and following a prescribed regimen.

Something tells me that if I dig into the Guardian’s references, I will find they spun something out of context which is what they usually do when they target something that’s a threat to the globalist agenda like IVM.

I don’t have time right now to find what the Guardian is BSing about here. If someone can dig and find it, please post it to this thread.

[metmom]

A Sydney gastroenterologist who has been enthusiastically promoting an unapproved Covid-19 treatment, including to Australian politicians and general practitioners, has filed a patent in the US for the same treatment, allowing him to commercialise and profit from it, if approved.

Just like big pharma has profited from their poison clot shots?

It’ll never be approved as they will not tolerate any competition or anyone or anything cutting into their profits.

[Organic Panic]

Unapproved by whom? Bureaucrats?

[Adder]

allowing him to commercialise and profit from it, if approved.

GAY-ASP!

The cheeky bassturd!

It should be free like the Pfizer and Moderna treatments!

/s

[Pollard]

unapproved Covid-19 treatment

Gee, I thought a treatment was whatever your doctor gave you to get better and that YOU are the one to approve it.