The FDA and the NIH formally allow their scientists to develop drugs with tax payer money and then personally patent them and profit from them without compensating tax payers.
Anthony Fauci knew Remdesivir was too damaging to use on anyone because he was trialing a drug in Africa and Remdesivir AND fauci’s drugs were removed from the trial because they were too damaging. So if it’s FINE for Fauci to trial and patent drugs, fine for the CDC to hold numerous patents and function like a drug company, FINE for the FDA to be in bed with pharma and patent drugs on taxpayer money, I don’t see how it’s suspicious if a private citizen does it.
here’s what i posted in another thread about what you talked about:
Horowitz: The $cience of remdesivir vs. ivermectin: A tale of two drugs
“A tale of two drugs. One has become the standard of care at an astronomical cost despite studies showing negative efficacy, despite causing severe renal failure and liver damage, and despite zero use outpatient. The other has been safely administered to billions for river blindness and now hundreds of millions for COVID throughout the world and has turned around people at death’s doorstep for pennies on the dollar. Yet the former – remdesivir – is the standard of care forced upon every patient, while the latter – ivermectin – is scorned and banned in the hospitals and de facto banned in most outpatient settings. But according to the NIH, a doctor has the same right to use ivermectin as to use remdesivir. And it’s time people know the truth.
Although the NIH and the FDA didn’t officially approve ivermectin as standard of care for COVID, it is listed on NIH’s website right under remdesivir as “Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19.” It is accorded the same status, the same sourcing for dosage recommendations, and the same monitoring advice as remdesivir … except according to NIH’s own guidance, remdesivir has a much greater potential for severe reactions in the very organs at stake in a bout with acute COVID.
As you can see, they admit that remdesivir causes renal and liver failure! One of the symptoms is “ALT and AST elevations,” which are indications of liver damage. Is that really the drug you want when someone is at risk for a cytokine storm and thrombosis? They even have a monitoring requirement for these side effects. Also, it does have some drug interactions as well.
Now, let’s move on to the ivermectin side effects.
Notice how the NIH is essentially saying it has no side effects by the fact that it prefaces the section by noting the drug is “generally well tolerated,” a distinction not accorded to remdesivir. Then it proceeds to list the same boilerplate GI and nausea warnings on every drug under the sun. There are almost no drug interactions and ZERO specific guidance for monitoring!”
https://ugolini.co.th/ugolini/horowitz-the-cience-of-remdesivir-vs-ivermectin-a-tale-of-two-drugs/