10 years of data?
I’m not taking sides here, in any direction.
But, who’s gonna provide 10 years worth of data when the virus has been around only about 2 years?
10 years of data?
I’m not taking sides here, in any direction.
But, who’s gonna provide 10 years worth of data when the virus has been around only about 2 years?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Real vaccines require 10 years to study and must pass rigorous standards before they are deemed safe OR effective. The CDC is making wild guesses, ignoring data and declaring them Safe and Effective. Don’t make the claim if they don’t have the data - and they don’t.
They have been working on the vaccines for more than 10 years. Moderna goes back to the early 2000s. There is an article from around 2016 about Moderna and its CEO in regard to developing the mRNA technology that you may find disturbing...hint...lots of hubris and chase the $.
mRNA type “vaccines” have been in development for 10 years. That record of success and failures could be explored.
Gain of Function research has been going on for more than a decade. More openness about that would save a few souls (of those keeping their mouth shut).
Both of those endeavors have been funded by public dollars for those 10 years. Honest details about that funding would be revealing.
But yeah, who’s gonna provide the data, faced with being branded a criminal and ostracized from society for doing so.
If you look at the patents on this virus, they go back quite a few years.
That's how.
“But, who’s gonna provide 10 years worth of data when the virus has been around only about 2 years?”
Normal vaccines have years of study behind them of successful accomplishments and incremental approvals. mRNA does not. It has since 1993 been a complete failure.
Remember. If it’s posted on a internet message board it’s always true