Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Informed Consent is Contrary to Your Best Interest, It's the Law
Vanity | 10/14/2021 | Vanity

Posted on 10/14/2021 11:30:53 AM PDT by Fitzy_888

H.R.34 - 21st Century Cures Act 114th Congress (2015-2016) Public Law 114-255 114th Congress

(…)

SEC. 3024. INFORMED CONSENT WAIVER OR ALTERATION FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS.

(…)

(b) Drugs.--Section 505(i)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)(4)) is amended by striking ``except where it is not feasible or it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings'' and inserting ``except where it is not feasible, it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings, or the proposed clinical testing poses no more than minimal risk to such human beings and includes appropriate safeguards as prescribed to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of such human beings''.

--------------------------------------------------------

TITLE 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS

21 U.S. Code § 355 - New drugs

(…)

(i) Exemptions of drugs for research; discretionary and mandatory conditions; direct reports to Secretary

(…)

(4) Regulations under paragraph (1) shall provide that such exemption shall be conditioned upon the manufacturer, or the sponsor of the investigation, requiring that experts using such drugs for investigational purposes certify to such manufacturer or sponsor that they will inform any human beings to whom such drugs, or any controls used in connection therewith, are being administered, or their representatives, that such drugs are being used for investigational purposes and will obtain the consent of such human beings or their representatives, except where it is not feasible, it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings, or the proposed clinical testing poses no more than minimal risk to such human beings and includes appropriate safeguards as prescribed to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of such human beings. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require any clinical investigator to submit directly to the Secretary reports on the investigational use of drugs.

(…)


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Reference; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; anthonyfauci; covidstooges; fauci; mandate; nih; obamacare; plannedparenthood; righttolife; vaccine
"...experts using such drugs for investigational purposes certify to such manufacturer or sponsor that they will inform any human beings to whom such drugs, or any controls used in connection therewith, are being administered, or their representatives, that such drugs are being used for investigational purposes and will obtain the consent of such human beings or their representatives , except where it is not feasible, it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings,..."

=> Explains a lot in retrospect.

1 posted on 10/14/2021 11:30:53 AM PDT by Fitzy_888
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888

St. Augustine: “an unjust law is no law at all.”


2 posted on 10/14/2021 11:34:14 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson