Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers; ransomnote; Jane Long; bitt; bagster; numberonepal; Cletus.D.Yokel; Cathi; ...
Report: Delta Pilot Dies from IN FLIGHT within last 10 days. Was speaking normally....said a few weird things then died. Received 2nd jab just days before. Flights being diverted for pilots with chest pains. Seattle based pilot found dead at home from embolism.... more....oh boy.... 🛬💥🔥 (rumble.com)

Anyone want to check this one out?

1,389 posted on 10/11/2021 12:32:45 PM PDT by grey_whiskers ((The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1201 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers; ransomnote; Jane Long; All

ICYMI:

Ticker Guy analysis of the Uk Report:

NEGATIVE EFFICIENCY CHART

Unfortunately what this means is that now for anyone over 30 you are more likely to get infected, yes, adjusted for the population that is vaccinated, if you are vaccinated. Indeed in the 40-49 age group you’re close to double as probable on a per-population basis.

This means that if your employer mandates the jabs he or she can be sued for putting those who can’t get vaccinated at double the risk, on purpose, by enforcing the mandate.

Since there are people who can’t (due to immune compromise, such as cancer patients) be vaccinated this is now intentional risk.

In other words this is hard, scientific evidence that these mandates by employers have increased the risk of customers (and other employees) contracting Covid-19. This isn’t a natural risk (which an employer is not responsible for) it’s a man-made one created by the employer.

That’s actionable.

So far this is not translating into higher risk of Covid hospitalization and death on a per-100,000 basis. But that the vaccine makes you more likely to both get and give to others the virus is now established. It is fact. It is in fact true for everyone who is over 30.

I have pointed out that preventing infection was never in the cards; it was not part of the EUA, it was not part of the studies, it was never demonstrated. But this is much worse because now we are talking about a direct threat to others.

The CDC, NIH and Biden almost-certainly know this.

This is why the mad rush to demand you get jabbed; they know damn well what this means and that while the manufacturer is immune the employers are not and in fact any such mandate leaves them wide open legally as soon as an unvaccinated person gets infected after being at said firm either as an employee or customer and sues the company on the basis of intentionally and maliciously increasing their risk by forcing their employees to get the jab, which is exactly what they did.

The data from England is conclusive in that regard.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243859
...SNIP...

The report he is reviewing is linked below:

UK Health Security Agency

COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report
Week 40

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf


1,608 posted on 10/12/2021 12:54:52 AM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1389 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson