Posted on 10/03/2021 6:33:49 PM PDT by Olog-hai
The Monarch’s lavish living quarters at Buckingham Palace are set to be reduced to little more than “a flat above the shop” when Prince Charles becomes King.
The plan is part of a radical drive to overhaul the vast Royal estate, which will involve the official London residence being thrown open to the public more than ever before.
Other changes being considered under Charles’ wide-ranging plans include turning Balmoral into a museum to the Queen and moving the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge into Windsor Castle, The Mail on Sunday understands.
Charles is said not to want the Berkshire residence for himself as its position under the Heathrow flight path makes it “too noisy”. […]
The Duke of York is said to be particularly anxious about his home, Park Lodge in Windsor Great Park. However, courtiers say there is no suggestion he will be asked to move. Prince Edward and Princess Anne are also said to be safe in Bagshot Park at Windsor and Gatcombe Park in Gloucestershire respectively. But others — including Andrew’s daughters Beatrice and Eugenie — will be vying for accommodation in the reshuffle. …
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
And I suggest that you please read 1 Samuel 8:7 in particular. They had a King right from the beginning, and what with Samuel being their last kritarch, this Kingship dates back to that aforementioned beginning.
Also go back to Deuteronomy 17:14-20, which foretold of the Israelites desiring to exchange their divine King for a human king.
Not to mention, Genesis 17:6 has God saying to Abraham “kings shall come out of thee” rather than “presidents shall come out of thee”. Exodus 19:6 has God telling Israel that they shall be “a kingdom of priests” rather than a republic of same; lest any of this be misperceived as a slight against the Founding Fathers, remember that one of their reputed rallying cries was “no King but Jesus”.
There are of course far more verses than that.
I guess you think that the royals killed Diana, too>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No they did not.
The Upper echelons of the Royal Family staff arranged that.
You think the cloak and dagger in fighting between royals stopped in the 16th century.
Hardly , it still goes on. And it involves one of the few Royal powers yet unmitigated by statute.....the power of survival in context.
You cross the line, accidents happen if there is no other alternative.
In charles case, what we likely will see publicly is Charle’s indisposition due to ill health.
Yup. We Americans think our deep state is powerful. The powers behind the Royal family of England are all that and more.
Bagshot Park? Is that a Hobbit palace?
The place name “Bagshot” predates Tolkien by about a millennium.
What’s he waiting for? He can move to someplace simple today if he’s actually serious about it.
I doubt Fauci wanted to kill the queen. He should have sent her a private message warning her not to take the vax. But she may survive the vax.
The Queen if she were a Christian would pass over Charles and make his son king.
Queen has no say.
Succession is governed by Parliament.
The inquest will find that for some reason he was unable to let go of the 4-bore and it took him down like an anchor.
Sounds like the Guilty White WOKE version of royalty.
It’s not a museum - it’s a palace for a King and Queen to live in... stuff your upper lip, fake shame and vain humility..
It’s silly...
Sounds like the 'son' is giving us the Guilty White WOKE version of royalty.
It's not a museum - it's a palace for a King and Queen to live in... stuff your upper lip, fake shame and vain humility..
It's silly....
Yes, may the Queen outlive him...
But apparently he wanted no strings attached...
You know those lefties and their “virtue”-signaling. Kinda like all the Hollyweirdos who said they’d leave the USA if Trump was elected back in 2016 but stayed . . .
(Star Trek TNG’s Marina Sirtis is one of the few who did leave, without specifically citing Trump.)
Unless she were to invoke her reserve powers. That would take a big show of loyalty on the part of the military, though, given all the reds in Parliament.
If she were a Christian, she would never have given assent to the 1967 Abortion Act or the 2014 “Marriage (Same-Sex ‘Couples’) Act”.
Refusal of royal assent is one of the monarch’s reserve powers (like when the US President vetoes a bill), but the lefties insist that its use in any case would cause a constitutional crisis (somehow) and an eventual ouster of the monarchy in favor of a (socialist) republic. So it’s a power that really isn’t, unless they were to have a monarch with the will to use it.
He’ll be king for a few months only.
Bought at the right time, that is for sure.
I say, sounds like the poor chap will be slumming it.
You need to go and watch some more spy movies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.