[CheshireTheCat]

Perot Conservative (CTH)
October 2, 2021 11:50 am

Former long-term DOJ prosecutor here on recent Durham indictment:

shipwreckedcrew.substack.com

Sep 30
“Suppose you want to get Sussman to talk, but he’s not interested. You tell him you are going to indict him but he think’s you’re bluffing or his friends in the Biden DOJ will save him. So you indict him on one charge. Message sent and received. Sussman knows he’s on his own.

Tweet 2

“He’s Rick Gates now. The only currency he has to trade is what he know about others, including Elias. So he agrees to talk finally. Now you have more information than before your Sussmann indictment. So you subpoena Perkins again — this time for Elias’ emails.

Tweet 3

“Elias takes you on a lot of directions other than just Alfa Bank.

“Some of the newly sought-after documents have been guarded so far by attorney-client privilege.”

Tweet 4

“Durham thinks he can defeat the privilege now.

“Based on what Sussman told him???”

[CheshireTheCat]

Annualized returns of the best investors in the world:
- Walter Schloss: 15.3%
- Bill Ackman: 16.9%
- Warren Buffett: 20%
- George Soros: 20%
- Peter Lynch: 29%
- Medallion Fund: 66%
- Nancy Pelosi: 69%— Nancy Pelosi Portfolio Tracker (@NancyTracker) October 1, 2021

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Cheshire; If a lawyer colludes with a client to commit a crime, or is hired by a client to comit a crime, and it can be demonstrated to the court without reference to their communications I suspect that attorney client privilege may not or will not apply and those communications will no longer be privileged. So the question would be whether HRC initiated this or was made aware and approved of this, or was Perkins-Coie freelancing it.

But that is just me, a non lawyer saying that. Happy to hear from any Legal Freepers on this. (Since Madison Saving Bank and Casa Grande.... it would be about dxxx time!)