Posted on 10/01/2021 7:55:05 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Nah. Conservatives are not lazy. Conservatives are some of the hardest working of anybody. The fatal flaw is that Conservatives eschew activism.
But lets be honest. We did fail to stay involved, to pass on history and traditions.
an “ism” is an ideology, do we not have any? What is conservatism? My observation is that conservatism can mean anything you want it to be.
But 10 Conservative Principles are presented here:
https://kirkcenter.org/conservatism/ten-conservative-principles/
Note that “Conservatism” is more a philosophy, rather than an “ism”.
If only all here on FR would have a philosophy, rather than an “ism”. There in lies freedom.
If I’m watching something on tv and one of the actors looks familiar, I go to Wikipedia to see what other shows/movies they have been in. Other than that, I stay away.
Part of our job is to support independent voices across the political spectrum.
I would also say we need to get more involved in local and state politics.
“A well regulated militia being necessary for..........”
Can anyone complete that sentence?
https://constitutioncenter.org/images/uploads/news/CNN_Aug_11.pdf
What did a free state mean?
It may seem obvious, but Rosen and Rakove agree the Constitution bore a lot of contemporary moralism and not every word is well-defined.
In this case, the meaning of “state” is what it appears to be.
“This is referring immediately to ‘state’ as in one of the states of the original colonies,”
Rosen says. “James Madison had the 1777 Virginia Declaration of Rights by his side when he wrote the Bill of Rights and he essentially copied and pasted language from it.”
Should our focus be on states? If we take back the power to the states it means less power in the central government. We have many states now beginning to assert their rights and need to encourage it. THIS MAY BE THE BEST LINE OF BATTLE.
The satellite countries being tired and jealous of the centralized government was one of the factors leading to the demise of the soviet union.
I agree with that. It’s a principle and not an ideology. That’s why there aren’t very many contradictions for a conservative.
There are some, and arguably the lack of activism is the biggest. I’ll always regard the Tea Party as the pinnacle of conservatism at large. We worked hard, and we won. And then we sat down. Sad.
I know I can educate a lot of people using my microphone and I’ll keep doing it, but I also know its not enough. I need to find other conservatives who do actually want to be activist but I don’t know where they are.
<>We couldn’t use Wikipedia as a source in university over 15 years ago<>
But nothing prevents anyone from checking out, when available, the Wiki footnote sources.
This is true, and quite the saver of time.
It sounds like you might have saved yourself some time previously.
Not that I’m informing you of anything, but skepticism of all digital info is a virtue.
Heck, online newspapers rewrite stories that, months later, become embarrassing.
I cherish my books authored by respected historians more than ever.
I need to find other conservatives who do actually want to be activist but I don’t know where they are.
or
speak the Good News and shake the dust from your feet of those that dont’ want to hear.
Having said that, I am old and tired....................
But I have managed to find a few warriors.
Wikipedia is very good on stuff like mathematics—but at some point they will figure out that “math is racist”—at that point I guess they will just eliminate all math pages!
If you want to know who Frank Zappa’s drummers were over the years, or what order to read the Recluce novels, Wikipedia is a fine resource.
If it’s anything even remotely political or religious, go elsewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.