Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Speech and Tolerance in America
Cato Institute ^ | October 31, 2017 | Emily Ekins

Posted on 09/28/2021 4:03:40 PM PDT by daniel1212

Nearly three‐​fourths (71%) of Americans [even 4 years ago] believe that political correctness has done more to silence important discussions our society needs to have. A little more than a quarter (28%) instead believe that political correctness has done more to help people avoid offending others.

Excluding a speaker who would disrespect police, Democrats are about 15 to 30 points more likely than Republicans to say each of these speakers should not be allowed to speak.

The survey finds that many microaggressions that colleges and universities advise faculty and students to avoid aren’t considered offensive by most African Americans and Latinos. The percentage who say these microaggressions are not offensive are as follows:

The one microaggression that African Americans (68%) agree is offensive is telling a racial minority, “you are a credit to your race.” Latinos are evenly divided.

Democratic and Republican students see their college campuses differently. A majority (59%) of Republican college students believe that most faculty members are liberal. In contrast, only 35% of Democratic college students agree most professors are liberal.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Education; Religion
KEYWORDS: bigotry; liberalbias; msm; politicallyincorrect
Excerpt from much larger survey, if somewhat dated. Tables (pdf, 7.18 MB)
1 posted on 09/28/2021 4:03:40 PM PDT by daniel1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

The one microaggression that African Americans (68%) agree is offensive is telling a racial minority, “you are a credit to your race.”


Frankly, that’s such a weird thing to say.


2 posted on 09/28/2021 4:38:38 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Bkmk


3 posted on 09/28/2021 4:41:21 PM PDT by sauropod (Bidet was no prize before he put the “d” in “dementia.” - Schlichter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Wow. A survey that confirms liberals have different genetic make up than normal folk.


4 posted on 09/28/2021 4:45:50 PM PDT by ImpBill (America! Has anybody seen her lately?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
Actually, all humor aside, "While the sequence of DNA may not be affected by your environment, the way genes work—called gene expression—can."
DNA is like a book about how to build a person, and genes are like sentences. So can these sentences be changed? According to Cedar, these letters are written in ink. You can’t add or modify them. But “it turns out that this text can be annotated,” he said. The secret to this change is “methyl groups.” These chemicals “tell the cells what should be read and what should not be read,” Cedar told us. They’re sort of like a black marker that you can use to cross out sentences, a process unsurprisingly called “methylation.” DNA may be unchangeable, but methyl groups are different. “Methylation can be changed.” This means your body-making instructions can change too.
Mounting evidence suggests that environmental factors such as smoking, diet and stress, can leave their mark on the genes of your children and grandchildren.

5 posted on 09/28/2021 5:02:07 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Any group that scores above zero percent on any question is asking for a solid thumping.

The proper response to offensive or stupid speech is intelligent (and in some cases, bitingly sarcastic) speech, not the jackboot of government thugs or government approved Browns Shirts.

6 posted on 09/28/2021 5:02:58 PM PDT by Castlebar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

That is 3 years old...everything is likely even more polarized now.


7 posted on 09/28/2021 5:59:05 PM PDT by consult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Castlebar
"The proper response to offensive or stupid speech is intelligent (and in some cases, bitingly sarcastic) speech, not the jackboot of government thugs or government approved Browns Shirts."
Correct.

8 posted on 09/29/2021 3:13:58 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: consult
"That is 3 years old...everything is likely even more polarized now."
Sadly true.

9 posted on 09/29/2021 3:14:34 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson