Let me think. Who to believe? A wackadoodle site such as the New England Journal Of Medicine, or the highly trusted stopworldcontrol.com.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110475
Your choice, as always.
“ Let me think. Who to believe? A wackadoodle site such as the New England Journal Of Medicine, or the highly trusted stopworldcontrol.com.”
———————————————————————————————
LMFAO!! 🤣😂😆🤪
I just don’t want you to feel left out as a target of unbalanced, divisive and nigh infantile hysteria over this subject from people who should know better when they’re being lead down the rabbit hole. 😬
Top. Kek.
The bombastic claims you rely on fall apart like wet toilet paper when you start looking 1 mm beneath the surface.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
(footnote 2 in your link)
shows that there were a total of 43, 548 participants TOTAL
for the BNT162b2 trials (not the mean of 884,828 claimed in your link).
Enrollees were followed for only 2 months; real world experience since the trials shows efficacy plunging in numerous countries, including Gibraltar, the UK, and Israel.
Sod off, swampy.