You’d think that someone could maybe reread his article once and fix all the typos before posting it. But I guess such attention to detail is too much trouble these days.
“But I guess such attention to detail is too much trouble these days.”
Problem is that on the other side of the house, there are people on the FR that will look up the article, identify the changes in mass, and give the writer he(( because he changed the article, right or wrong. Damned if you do,...
wy69
YEAH, You’d think.....................
Although the author of the article did write a lot of typos (as you mentioned), I have to say I really enjoyed the style of writing in the article; how it was very informative about the snakes, but that he also put some humor into it.
Like when he wrote “In fact, you’re best off avoiding this entire island. And most do, and not just because visitors are banned. I guess people prefer not to have their skin melt.”
And “The rest are either naive morons or poachers. And both of those groups have no business anywhere near snake island.”
I didn’t expect those kind of statements in an article that is actually very scientific and informative, but I really liked it.