Posted on 09/20/2021 5:37:10 PM PDT by massmike
Why in the world would anyone want to ban a medicine that is listed as a WHO essential safe medicine,won the Nobel prize,and has turned around millions of people with COVID from death's doorstep? The Australians have now let the cat out of the bag.The reason is because it works, and it will eradicate COVID, along with the agenda — from control to vaccination — that they have built upon its existence.
The three reasons given for the TGA's decision were as shocking as they were revealing. "Firstly,there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin," begins the statement.If you stop reading at that point mid-sentence, you are likely wondering how a drug that was praised more than any other drug in recent decades and was used safely billions of times could suddenly cause such terrible problems.However, when you complete the sentence, you will understand what sort of "risk" they are referring to. Here is the full explanation:
"Firstly, there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin in an attempt to prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated. Individuals who believe that they are protected from infection by taking ivermectin may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms. Doing so has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community."
That's it! That is the reason they not only oppose ivermectin here and in Australia, but oppose hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, fenofibrate, and any and all forms of preventive and outpatient treatment. This is the most evident admission yet from the Australian government that it can't afford to get rid of the virus with something so cheap because it will obviate the need for the vaccine ... and the totalitarian agenda accompanying it.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
“I doubt there will ever be a vax for a flu/cold virus...they mutate so quickly you always be behind the curve.”
18 months ago someone here told me that developing a vaccine was hopeless for this virus...he was right.
“Vaccines for the flu and Covid do not give the kind of long lasting, robust immunity that actually catching the virus would, and zinc ionophores allow for the body to properly deal with the virus and attain immunity without the risk of a severe infection while doing so.”
I’m thinking more of the Polio vaccine...don’t hear much of that disease anymore. But I agree on flu shots, although they have worked for me. In any case, these ‘vaccines’ are a joke, and they probably faked everything they sent to government.
“You do not vaccinate out of a pandemic!”
I agree now...but at the beginning, my brain said that a vaccine that works 99% of the time would make it really tough for a virus to spread.
...but we didn’t get that.
People have been trying for decades to make a coronavirus vaccine, so it was obvious that the right approach was to focus on treatments.
Government made the decision to direct resources to vaccines instead of treatments. The free market, as always, would have solved the problem quickly.
A politician without any knowledge of medicine thought he should decide how to direct resources for health services, instead of having each person who created this wealth to make his decision.
If not, then why the masks?
If so, why the vaccines?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.