Posted on 09/20/2021 5:37:10 PM PDT by massmike
Why in the world would anyone want to ban a medicine that is listed as a WHO essential safe medicine,won the Nobel prize,and has turned around millions of people with COVID from death's doorstep? The Australians have now let the cat out of the bag.The reason is because it works, and it will eradicate COVID, along with the agenda — from control to vaccination — that they have built upon its existence.
The three reasons given for the TGA's decision were as shocking as they were revealing. "Firstly,there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin," begins the statement.If you stop reading at that point mid-sentence, you are likely wondering how a drug that was praised more than any other drug in recent decades and was used safely billions of times could suddenly cause such terrible problems.However, when you complete the sentence, you will understand what sort of "risk" they are referring to. Here is the full explanation:
"Firstly, there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin in an attempt to prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated. Individuals who believe that they are protected from infection by taking ivermectin may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms. Doing so has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community."
That's it! That is the reason they not only oppose ivermectin here and in Australia, but oppose hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, fenofibrate, and any and all forms of preventive and outpatient treatment. This is the most evident admission yet from the Australian government that it can't afford to get rid of the virus with something so cheap because it will obviate the need for the vaccine ... and the totalitarian agenda accompanying it.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
The Fauci Flu.
“We’re more interested in doing what we want, than in doing what could save more lives.”
Doing the same thing here...
Can “vaccinated” spread the China Virus or not?
If not, then why the masks?
A thousand doctors suing the WHO! Look what this doctor found on Fauci!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_RIWN4LP9M
A thousand doctors suing the WHO! Look what this doctor found on Fauci!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_RIWN4LP9M
My question is, who is controlling the leadership of our countries?
So taking Ivermectin will alleviate the need to vaccinate people and big pharma doesn’t like that...gotcha. It’s always about money.
“So taking Ivermectin will alleviate the need to vaccinate people and big pharma doesn’t like that...gotcha. It’s always about money.”
A vaccine would still be better, if they can come up with with one that actually works like normal vaccines...maybe in a few years, hopefully.
Up next, Ivermectin smugglers.
I doubt there will ever be a vax for a flu/cold virus...they mutate so quickly you always be behind the curve. They are still giving vaxes for last years Covid strains that don’t exist any more...that’s like getting last years flu shot for this years flu...it’s pointless, unless you goal is to make money.
No, a vaccine would not be better.
Vaccines for the flu and Covid do not give the kind of long lasting, robust immunity that actually catching the virus would, and zinc ionophores allow for the body to properly deal with the virus and attain immunity without the risk of a severe infection while doing so.
You can’t fix stupid.
Which is why NGOs give it away for free to illiterate central African villagers...
You do not vaccinate out of a pandemic!
Numerous docs have explained this.
We did all of the WRONG things....locking down, closing schools, masks, no large gatherings, and no EARLY, proven treatments.
“ Several medical groups and pharmacy advocacy organizations have released a statement calling for an immediate end to dispensing, prescribing, and use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19, outside of its use in clinical trials.
The groups include the American Medical Association, the American Pharmacists Association, and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. According to a press release, ivermectin is approved by the FDA for the prevention of infections caused by internal or external parasites in humans but is not approved for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.”
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/pharmacy-groups-call-for-immediate-end-to-prescribing-dispensing-ivermectin-for-covid-19-outside-of-clinical-trials
Off label use of drugs is a common practice.
That sure does tie them together, doesn’t it?
Clearly, the health and well being of people is of no concern to them. The only thing sick people are good for is providing a great source of income for big pharma.
Spot on!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
