EXCLUSIVE – Covid-19 deaths are 58 times higher than this time last year and 78% of those dying had the Covid-19 vaccine according to Public Health data

theexpose.uk ^ | SEPTEMBER 15, 2021 | DAILY EXPOSE

[ransomnote]

[H/T Robert DeLong]

Deaths associated with Covid-19 across the UK are significantly higher than this time last year despite 89% of adults allegedly being vaccinated against the disease, and despite the fact summer is supposed to help to keep the alleged virus at bay due to seasonality.

The mainstream media, Public Health sources, and the government are doing their best to convince you that it is the unvaccinated who make up the majority of those deaths. But to do this they are including deaths from the height of the second wave of Covid-19 back in January when barely anybody has been vaccinated.

A recent article by the BBC claimed the following –

Whereas the actual data available from Public Health England shows that 70% of Covid-19 deaths since February 2021 up to the 29th August 2021 were among the vaccinated population.

Then we have the latest data from Scotland, in which another attempt has been made to hide the fact the majority of Covid-19 deaths are occurring among the fully vaccinated population.

Official data shows that between the 5th August 2020 and the 2nd September 2020 just 3 Covid-19 deaths were recorded in the whole of Scotland. But fast forward to the present day and official data shows 179 deaths were recorded across Scotland between the 5th August 2021 and the 2nd September 2021.

This means Covid-19 deaths across Scotland are currently 5,866.66% / 58.6 times higher than they were this time last year, despite the majority of the population of being vaccinated and summer being on their side.

You would of course expect the majority of cases to be among the unvaccinated population, but this just isn’t the case. The latest Covid-19 statistical report released by Public Health Scotland on the 15th September reveals that from August 14th through to September 10th 2021 63,437 positive cases were recorded among the unvaccinated population, whilst 78,136 were recorded among the vaccinated population; 55,696 of which were among the fully vaccinated.

As you can see the number of cases is very similar between the unvaccinated population and fully vaccination population so you would expect to see a similar number of deaths among the unvaccinated and fully vaccinated population. Except, we’re not.

This is where Public Health Scotland are trying to hide the fact the majority of deaths are among the vaccinated due to the date parameters they have used to publish deaths by vaccination status. The deaths stretch back as far as the 29th December.

This means they are including deaths from the height of the alleged second wave of Covid-19 where just 9% of the population had received a single dose, and just 0.1% of the entire population were fully vaccinated. 

Table 17 of the report published by Public Health Scotland on the 16th August 2021 shows that between December 29th 2020 and August 5th 2021 3,077 Covid-19 death were recorded among the unvaccinated, whilst 273 deaths were recorded among the partly vaccinated and 206 deaths were recorded among the fully vaccinated.

As you can see from the above table PHS have made it seem like the Covid-19 vaccines are working and the majority of people dying are the unvaccinated. But fast forward to the most recent report published September 15th and we can see the true numbers of people who are dying by their vaccination status.

Table 17 of the latest report shows that between December 29th 2020 and September 2nd 2021 3,116 deaths were recorded among the unvaccinated population – an increase of 39 deaths over 4 weeks. Whilst 281 deaths were recorded among the partly vaccinated population – an increase of 8 deaths over 4 weeks. But 338 deaths were recorded among the fully vaccinated population – an increase of 132 over 4 weeks.

This means that the unvaccinated account for just 21.7% of all Covid-19 deaths since August 5th 2021, whilst the vaccinated population account for 78.3% of all deaths since the same date, with the fully vaccinated accounting for 74% of the deaths.

If we’re seeing this number of deaths in summer and when the majority of the population has had a vaccine that allegedly reduces their risk of death by 95% then we dread to think what we’re going to see when winter arrives.

---

[BenLurkin]

Maybe the vaxxy no worky too good, yes?

[chopperk]

Why is the American medical community ignoring Ivermectin since India has had dramatic result from its use.

[kiryandil]

May they Rest In Peace.

[shanover]

We need to hear from Feepvaxxers!

[Maris Crane]

How hard is it to connect the jabs?

If vaccinated people are contributing to the death numbers, could we assume that perhaps there is a cause and effect working here.

No saying I’m against vaccines...just sayin’.

[DuncanWaring]

... 70% of Covid-19 deaths since February 2021 up to the 29th August 2021 were among the vaccinated population.

---

Yes, but since they’re vaccinated, they’re only mildly dead.

[DuncanWaring]

That’s a rhetorical question, right?

[Chgogal]

What is a Feepvaaxxer?

[laplata]

U rite. Vaxxy no worky. But make u sick.

[ReaganGeneration2]

Admittedly, this is still much lower than the peak in December.

OTOH, the *exalted “efficacy” numbers have CRASHED. Efficacy is all a comparison with vaxx vs unvaxxed, not absolute risk. The efficacy is dogsh!t over time. Without this, mandates should die.

* In other words, if 10 people wear tinfoil hats and get struck by lightning in the US, and 100 people are struck without a hat, the tinfoil hat efficacy is
1 - (10/100) = 90%. But how many of us would suffer thru a “tinfoil hat mandate” for “our health and safety”???

[Maudeen]

I just bought some. . .1%. Getting to be out of stock in some places.

[Candor7]

The vaccine is a dead end path to coping with Covid.

Eventually it will not work at all.

Immunity via infection is 27 times more effective than any Vax.

So how do we get immunity? We use drug therapy once infected, and we all sooner or later will be infected, its like the common cold, unavoidable.

The best so far is Ivermectin based drug therapy.

The proper approach to conquering the virus is one like we use for malaria.

Ivermectin therapy should be over the counter, non prescription, and used according to established protocols with which we can educate the public.

If you cannot get a physician’s prescription, you can order it here:( Use Pay Pal)

1) Zivirdo Kit:

https://dir.indiamart.com/search.mp?ss=Zivirdo&prdsrc=1&countryiso=USA

2) Ivermectin Tabs ( get 12 mg tabs)

https://dir.indiamart.com/search.mp?ss=ivermection+12+mg&prdsrc=1&src=as-popular%3Akwd%3Divermect12%3Apos%3D1%3Acat%3D-2%3Amcat%3D-2&qu-cx=1&countryiso=USA

***************************

Protocols to follow for both Prophylaxis and Therapy for Infection:( read it in detail before ordering)

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-I-MASK-Protocol-v4-2020-11-22.pdf

Ivermectin is no longer a banned treatment by the CDC. They are just “not recommending” it.The reason that the government is so afraid of Ivermectin is that it likely clears the circulation system of ALL stick proteins whether generated by the VAX or by the Virus. So it will likely reverse the effect of the jab.

You will need over the counter Zinc, Vitamin D and Quercetin supplements.Available on line or at larger drug stores.

Hundreds of Feepers stocked up over the last 6 months.

********************************

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343390023_Ivermectin_docks_to_the_SARS-CoV-2_spike_receptor-binding_domain_attached_to_A

There is reasonably solid evidence that ivermectin docks to the spike protein itself to prevent binding to the ACE2 receptor which is the primary pathology causing the tissue damage and clots related to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this is also an implication that this ability of ivermectin to disable the binding of the Spike protein including the vaccine-produced spike proteins. This binding of ivermectin to disable the spike protein is also preserved even with the newer spike protein mutations, but its activity against the original Wuhan spike protein,(the one vaccines were designed to produce) is fairly well studied at this point.

Abstract:

Background/Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2. Materials and Methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study. Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08. Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.

The following video explains the multiple mechanisms of the activity of Ivermectin including the ability of the body to maintain its basic defense of the cell nucleus in preserving the body’s ability to produce antiviral proteins, inhibition of RNA dependant RNA polymerase which inhibits the replication of viral RNA (possibly including that from the mRNA vaccine package), the stat 3 human signaling pathway which inhibits the production of blood clots also possibly mitigating some of the vaccines most dangerous side effects. Also discussed is the inhibition of the CD147 pathway by ivermectin which again may block the clumping of platelets due to spike protein either from the virus or possibly the vaccines.

Note: Ivermectin therapy likley will gradually rid the body of spike proteins altogether, something to remember for those who might have residual side effects from mRNA vaccine.

Huge successes have happened. Here is one:

“HUGE: Uttar Pradesh, India Announces State Is COVID-19 Free Proving the Effectiveness of “Deworming Drug” IVERMECTIN”

[zek157]

Hospitals have PREP Act immunity that them from all liability in treating covid only when they follow the limited approved protocol, which doesn’t include ivermectin. Using unapproved treatments will cause loss of PREP Act protections. I believe most doctors have to follow the mandated protocols, or they lose privileges/ability to practice.

https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/4-PREP-Act.aspx

Section VII. Limitations on Distribution
The Secretary may specify that liability protections are in effect only for Covered Countermeasures obtained through a particular means of distribution. The Declaration previously stated that liability immunity is afforded to Covered Persons only for Recommended Activities related to (a) present or future federal contracts, cooperative agreements, grants, other transactions, interagency agreements, or memoranda of understanding or other federal agreements; or (b) activities authorized in accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute, or dispense the Covered Countermeasures following a declaration of an emergency.

COVID-19 is an unprecedented global challenge that requires a whole-of-nation response that utilizes federal-, state-, and local- distribution channels as well as private-distribution channels. Given the broad scale of this pandemic, the Secretary amends the Declaration to extend PREP Act coverage to additional private-distribution channels, as set forth below.

The amended Section VII adds that PREP Act liability protections also extend to Covered Persons for Recommended Activities that are related to any Covered Countermeasure that is:

licensed, approved, cleared, or authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (or that is permitted to be used under an Investigational New Drug Application or an Investigational Device Exemption) under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act or Public Health Service (PHS) Act to

[Old Yeller]

Never see that in the MSM news.

[Pajamajan]

Yup.

Vaxxy no worky.

[ransomnote]

PING

[ransomnote]

Maybe the vaxxy no worky too good, yes?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The ‘vaccines’ are working as our enemies intended - they are injuring and killing Americans.

[TexasGator]

3116 / 3735 = 83%.

Most deaths from the unvaccinated.

[TexasGator]

Anti-vaxers burn the midnight distorting data.