Posted on 09/14/2021 10:20:20 AM PDT by rxsid
Not just the vaccinated. Judging by some early warnings about exposing pregnant or breast feeding women to the vaccinated the “vaccines” may be somewhat contagious themselves.
So if I had Pfizer vaccine, I can still catch Covid, but then I will be super resistant?
Can the Vaxxed now sue for being talked into a rushed vaccine that INCREASES their chance of getting delta?
Wow. Creepy, huh?
Well, the million dollar question is the immune response to a COVID infection that occurs after vaccination.
I think the fairest thing to say is, nobody knows. You would like to think that you would pick up nucleocapsid antibodies and boost your spike antibodies, but there's no data.
This study makes sense.
If we had herd immunized (not shut down or vaccinated) and treated with Z-packs, vitamins and Ivermectin, would we have been better off? Would the virus have run out of gas after 2 months?
I’m thinking, yes.
I was waiting for some fried chicken yesterday and the guy next to me was rubbing and moving his arm.
He said “I just got my first Vaccine”
I said “I hope you survive”
he started getting all defensive about how it was his choice.
I told him I respected that, and it should be an individual choice.
Then I asked him how much he trusted the govt to be truthful and only do things in his best interest.
Ping to Vax proven ineffective...Japanese study.
That is my understanding - the “vaccines” waste the most important frontline defense of our natural immune system on the original wild spike protein ONLY. That leaves no protection for variants AND the “vaccinated” immune system is weakened in the fight against variants. PLUS natural immune response is to the WHOLE virus, not just to the constantly changed outer spike.
All of this was predicted by Geert Vanden Bossche. Just yesterday one of the trolls here at FR called him a charlatan and said “show me the study” - hard to have a study before the event (vaccination) occurs, but here’s your Japanese study in the OP confirming Geert’s prediction. Geert is an expert in this field and very pro-vaccines, but not this vaccine and not during a pandemic. He said this is the wrong weapon (only going after the little spike protein) at the wrong time (you don’t do mass vaccinations during the pandemic because that creates viral resistance and immune escape (see the OP article use and confirm these words).
Del explains Geert’s prediction, short 17 minute version
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oL50HD97u2q3/
Del explains Geert’s prediction, long 1:04.30 hour, NOTE this was posted way back on 3/13/2021....
https://youtu.be/SGXpt9TrF3E
Geert explains it in a lengthy article on his own website, posted 5 days ago
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post
No need to retain it, just bookmark it for future reference :).
Be informed, pros/cons. Don’t let the gov/media complex choose for you what data/news/information you get to see.
FRegards!
Not the way I remember it. I thought they promised the world.
==============================================
FYI, right from the source:
The covid vaccines were given emergency use authorization to "prevent" covid...NOT to reduce severity of disease, hospitalizations or deaths
Pfizer's EUA:
"the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used in the treatment of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used)."
Moderna's EUA: "Having concluded that the criteria for issuance of this authorization under Section 564(c) of the Act are met, I am authorizing the emergency use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19"
Janssens's EUA: "On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 for individuals 18 years of age and older pursuant to Section 564 of the Act."
An excellent question posed to him. I'm sure he had an equally excellent response (not).
Of course they mutate and that is an issue with the vaccine with its limited focus on the s-protein. Especially with these incessant break-out cases. We are asking for problems.
My comment was jackassish.
Thank you.
I honestly felt sorry for the guy, he seemed nice.
He immediately said I don’t really trust them at all.
Thank you for posting the truth. It absolutely was billed that way. Everyone I know that took it this summer said that very thing to me.
Everyone also said “safe and effective”, that was the catch phrase for a long time.
Then it was, if you take it and get Covid you will have mild symptoms. Then it was you might have symptoms but you won’t end up in the hospital. Then it was you might end up in the hospital, but you won’t end up in ICU. Then it was you might end up in ICU but you won’t die.
Then it was the unvaxxed are filling the hospitals and taking ALL the ICU beds. Then it was “most” of the ICU beds. Now, I think it is (I can’t keep up) most cases in the hospital are not serious.
The fact is, there are as many if not more vaxxed in the hospital as unvaxxed with Covid, and that is not even counting the adverse reactions they are trying to hide. And of course in the fine print they count undervaxxed and 2nd shot <14 days as unvaxxed. And they use data from last year or from January of this year for their data which skews all of it towards the unvaxxed to make it look worse than it really is
It’s enough to make my head spin.
I know that in GA’s own data, the difference between hospitalizations and deaths between vaxxed and “unvaxxed” is .7% and .4% respectively. And that is assuming the data or the tests are even reliable.
It’s all smoke and mirrors.
📌
Your saying it's their hypothesis (i.e. speculation). But it's not. It's their theory, based on the outcome(s) they observed while doing their study in the lab.
What they are saying is, if a 4th mutation occurs "naturally," then the Delta variant will be "poised" (though not 100% guaranteed) to acquire complete resistance to the mRNA vaccines (like what happened in their study done in the lab).
That word, "poised" is key. It's a warning by actual scientists of what may/likely to occur should a 4th mutation happen with the Delta variant.
Indeed!
After 4+ years of the continuous coup against Trump (the outsider who took down 2 political "dynasties" in one election), the basturds finally found something they could leverage to get rid of him.
So they went all in with unprecedented actions (lockdowns, closures, restrictions on liberty, etc.) for a virus that...while serious for those with comorbidities and the elderly, is most certainly not unprecedented.
Now, they have moved the goalposts so many times and are so deep into their disastrous actions, they have little to no choice but to push ahead. And, the evil among them see this as a continuing opportunity to go full dictatorship.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.