Skip to comments.
Major study finds convalescent plasma doesn't help seriously ill COVID-19 patients
https://medicalxpress.com ^
| SEPTEMBER 9, 2021
| by McMaster University
Posted on 09/09/2021 11:53:44 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: Red Badger
Sounds like more lies from the healthcare community.
To: Robert DeLong
My local blood bank stopped taking convalescent plasma months ago and are even turning away people who have had the vaccine or recovered from COVID for plasma and platelet donations due to the risks to those who receive those components.
3
posted on
09/09/2021 11:57:53 AM PDT
by
rarestia
(Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
To: Red Badger
Interesting.
Going in next week to get bled for this. We will see what the ladies say
4
posted on
09/09/2021 11:58:06 AM PDT
by
redgolum
(If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
To: Red Badger
I’m glad that controlled studies such as this are being done. I just wish it was somewhat larger.
To: Red Badger
IIRC plasma from post infected people works but the plasma from vaccinated people is harmful.
This report is CYA.
6
posted on
09/09/2021 11:59:32 AM PDT
by
lizma2
To: redgolum
“… Going in next week to get bled for this. We will see what the ladies say”
**************************************************************************
Will they give you your titer levels?
To: Red Badger
SOS.
Wait until somebody is on death’s doorstep then try the treatment and when the patient dies say it doesn’t work.
8
posted on
09/09/2021 12:05:59 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
To: Red Badger
Early in the pandemic, one of the locl hospitals was using convalescent plasma to significant benefit for its patients. This has now been replaced by monoclonal antibody infusions. The cited study emphasizes that the level of antibodies in the plasma makes a big difference in the success of the plasma treatment, as common sense would predict.
9
posted on
09/09/2021 12:12:59 PM PDT
by
riverdawg
(Wells Fargo is my bank and I have no complaints.)
To: Red Badger
The minimal efficacy of CP against COVID has been reported for 15 months or more. This just confirms what others have been saying for a long time.
10
posted on
09/09/2021 12:14:03 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“Love many, trust few, always paddle your own canoe.”)
To: Red Badger
I think Floridians would beg to differ. The number of dead has gone down dramatically coinciding with opening-up antibody treatment centers while the numbers infected are still very high.
11
posted on
09/09/2021 12:18:02 PM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths. )
To: riverdawg
riverdawg :" The cited study emphasizes that the level of antibodies in the plasma makes a big difference in the success of the plasma treatment,
as common sense would predict."
So, perhaps the most recent recovery patient plasma would have the more active antibodies, than those who recovered from covid a year ago ?
To: JoSixChip
... the numbers infected are still very high Which I believe is bogus. .....................
13
posted on
09/09/2021 12:19:41 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: Robert DeLong
I’m my experience both remdesivir and convalescent plasma is worthless
14
posted on
09/09/2021 12:21:15 PM PDT
by
gas_dr
(Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
To: Red Badger
Which I believe is bogus.
I don't believe anything they report ether. I'm just using what they are reporting to show that even their own lies don't support what they say.
15
posted on
09/09/2021 12:22:51 PM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths. )
To: JoSixChip
That’s monoclonal therapy. Not convalescent plasma. Monoclonals work extremely well
16
posted on
09/09/2021 12:22:56 PM PDT
by
gas_dr
(Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
To: gas_dr
Monoclonals work extremely well
Then no need for the dangerous vax, right Dr. faux?
17
posted on
09/09/2021 12:28:13 PM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths. )
To: rarestia
The Red Cross said they wouldn’t take blood from the vaxxed but then quickly backtracked.
Bottom line, we know nothing about this monster other than it’s not going away anytime soon.
18
posted on
09/09/2021 12:31:22 PM PDT
by
bgill
(.Which came first, the vax or the virus?)
To: Red Badger
Sure helped the guy I know of. Dr. told family he wasn’t sure if he’d make it, but found a donor match. Moved out of ICU the next day, went home feeling good the day after.
To: JoSixChip
No there is a role for prevention and treatment. and the FLCCC agrees
20
posted on
09/09/2021 12:32:07 PM PDT
by
gas_dr
(Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson