They don’t want solutions. They want problems.
If there is an effective treatment, the the vaccines could not be authorized. In short, the reason is money.
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
The answer is very simple. If Ivermectin is acknowledged as an effective preventative and treatment for Covid, the approval of an emergency, experimental drug can not legally move forward. The billions of dollars resulting from the distribution of these new patented injections would no longer flow into the pockets of those who are opposing Ivermectin. See how that works?
Bookmark
same as hydroxy or any potential drug therapy. it would kill the vaccine
Using in India.
Indonesia has been using it since the end of June [the populace has a problem with getting stuck with needles]. Naturally, the Cone Of Media Silence has descended over Indonesia.
“There appears to be a major effort made to prevent the use of Ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 cases.
The question is WHY???”
PLEEZE!! Isn’t it obvious that with the large scale usage of the many other treatments and preventatives to this China Virus the media and this puke Administration loses it’s ability to inflict mass panic and control over the uninformed and easily frightened?
The COVID is the ultimate crisis. There will be no solutions.
Because the world-wide #JihadJunta wants us dead.
They apparently didn’t get the memo from big pharma. Somebody’s crap is in the wind.
I got 3 days in face book jail for posting this very recent Meta analysis.... I might need to check out what is in some old magazines.
What if timely use of a therapeutic, including Ivermectin, can prevent the loss of smell in CoupFlu patients..?
Patients are being denied the possibility for political reasons. And too many health professionals are aiding and abetting Deep State.
We have been following the Ivermectin, HCQ, and Budesonide thing almost from the beginning, and we firmly believe that the great majority of those people were just allowed to be sick with no early treatment; allowed to get sick enough to need ICUs; allowed to get sick enough to need ventilators; allowed to die.
We ourselves watched an impassioned Dr. Pierre Kory address a U.S. Senate committee telling them why Ivermectin was a large part of the solution. Dr. Kory was ignored.
It is mass murder to just allow hundreds of thousands of people to perish without even being given an option of early treatment.
There! That might be a more accurate title.
Insights welcome.
ping
One thing I have yet to see answered is whether it is wise to take prophylactic Ivermectin AFTER having gotten two doses of the vaccine. Would it help prevent so-called breakthrough infections?
C’mon man, you don’t really believe this story, do you?
You probably believe that Trump won and that the election was STOLEN!
Sarcasm
“the use of remarks that clearly mean the opposite of what they say, ... to criticize something in a humorous way”