Posted on 09/06/2021 7:45:22 AM PDT by DOC44
In summary, based on the totality of the trials and epidemiologic evidence presented in this review along with the preliminary findings of the Unitaid/WHO meta-analysis of treatment RCTs and the guideline recommendation from the international BIRD conference, ivermectin should be globally and systematically deployed in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
(Excerpt) Read more at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ...
I got 3 days in face book jail for posting this very recent Meta analysis.... I might need to check out what is in some old magazines.
LOL! You don't often find people on FR who swear by the veracity of FauXi, jao xiden and CNN. Rand Corporation "influencer"?
What if timely use of a therapeutic, including Ivermectin, can prevent the loss of smell in CoupFlu patients..?
Patients are being denied the possibility for political reasons. And too many health professionals are aiding and abetting Deep State.
Post 2
Bingo!
Problems beg for heavy-handed control.
Bingo. An effective therapeutic that treats people when ill is worst case scenario, they will stop at all cost.
We have been following the Ivermectin, HCQ, and Budesonide thing almost from the beginning, and we firmly believe that the great majority of those people were just allowed to be sick with no early treatment; allowed to get sick enough to need ICUs; allowed to get sick enough to need ventilators; allowed to die.
We ourselves watched an impassioned Dr. Pierre Kory address a U.S. Senate committee telling them why Ivermectin was a large part of the solution. Dr. Kory was ignored.
It is mass murder to just allow hundreds of thousands of people to perish without even being given an option of early treatment.
Because vaxx billionaires paid good money for those "studies".
Pay no attention to what is going on in Africa, India and Indonesia with Ivermectin.
There! That might be a more accurate title.
Insights welcome.
Just say nay to da Horsepaste, Wilbur!
“Great. Now compare ivermectin to the vaccines. The US vaccines win hands down.”
ping
” asinine post”
Up yours
For reference- same story stored in different formats.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
https://tinyurl.com/yxdjwu6t
https://archive.is/TlQyG
One thing I have yet to see answered is whether it is wise to take prophylactic Ivermectin AFTER having gotten two doses of the vaccine. Would it help prevent so-called breakthrough infections?
Post 34 - FYI
I believe SoConPubbie was talking about post #9, not your excellent initial article post.
It's killer on inflammation associated with da covid, and has such a low risk profile [they give it to villagers in Africa like candy] that I can't see why you wouldn't use it prophylactically.
I can’t be too critical of physicians who believe what various medical authorities have been putting out there regarding covid treatments..
There simply are not enough hours in the day for them to look deeply into all this... and there is so much deliberate lying on all sides. The typical physician simply has no time, only a few minutes to speak to each patient and even less to ponder the truth of this covid mess...
It’s a long and depressing journey from trusting the various health authorities to questioning the veracity of everything they say.
C’mon man, you don’t really believe this story, do you?
You probably believe that Trump won and that the election was STOLEN!
Sarcasm
“the use of remarks that clearly mean the opposite of what they say, ... to criticize something in a humorous way”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.