Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minneapolis man who opened fire on police officers at George Floyd riot is ACQUITTED by city jury
Jack Posobiec on Twitter ^ | September 4, 2021 | Jack Posobiec

Posted on 09/04/2021 1:46:04 PM PDT by White Lives Matter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: White Lives Matter

Jaleel is going to kill somebody. Count on it.


21 posted on 09/04/2021 2:22:33 PM PDT by TalBlack (We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Sounds like a just outcome.

There have been other cases.

When the police act like criminals, they may be treated as criminals.

22 posted on 09/04/2021 2:23:29 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Surprised the court let the defense make the argument.

Prosecutor must have been asleep at the switch.

Gotta know when to object”

I’m sure that he did exactly what he was told to do by his superiors. Nothing.


23 posted on 09/04/2021 2:26:00 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie (When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Bamboozled the court and jury real good with that story. Props to his attorney.

Imagine that. An innocent man walks free. Whatever is this country coming to?

24 posted on 09/04/2021 2:26:19 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sunny bonobo
Was the officer shot while he was in the van? If so, I’m gonna have to side with the defense.

No officers were shot. They were the ones who shot first, piling out of an unmarked white van shooing rubber bullets. He fires back and once he became aware they were police he dropped his gun and lay down on the ground. The police actions were confirmed through their own body cams, through false reports that they filed on the incident, and eye witnesses.

I will support police completely when they are in the right. But not when they are in the wrong, and they were in the wrong on this one.

25 posted on 09/04/2021 2:30:24 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

Balance of nature. /too many commercials.


26 posted on 09/04/2021 2:37:12 PM PDT by sauropod (Bidet was no prize before he put the “d” in “dementia.” - Schlichter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I can imagine self defense against outlaw cops to be upheld in court. If some idiot with a badge opens fire on you or yours for no good reason are you just going to die at the altar of the thin blue tyranny or are you going to fight back like an American?


27 posted on 09/04/2021 2:39:41 PM PDT by MercyFlush (The final variant is called Communism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Kind of depends on the circumstances. Currently 99% of the time I’d say that defense was beyond insane. However, when they come to arrest you and put you in indefinite detention because they found a video of you wearing a MAGA hat 8 months ago I’d say there would be some leeway for considering it to be self defense.


28 posted on 09/04/2021 2:39:56 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

If thats what happened, the jury made the correct decision.


29 posted on 09/04/2021 3:03:35 PM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Seems like justice was served here.

Stallings did the right thing.

Thanks for clearing it up!


30 posted on 09/04/2021 3:29:07 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal (Jesus + Something = Nothing ; Jesus + Nothing = Everything )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

It never was possible. The more power the left steals, the more dangerous they get.


31 posted on 09/04/2021 3:35:34 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Ah! Now that’s a horse paste of a different color.

If those are the facts then the jury made the right decision.


32 posted on 09/04/2021 3:47:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (I won't get vaxxed because it endangers Mitt Romney's life. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Vice grip Derek


33 posted on 09/04/2021 4:48:27 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Actually it is becoming a common need for even law abiding citizens...


34 posted on 09/04/2021 4:56:57 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MercyFlush

Yep... They do not have a right of one sided justice without any fault at all.


35 posted on 09/04/2021 4:58:09 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

Yep.

CC


36 posted on 09/04/2021 5:23:57 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Jury of his peers. Again I am glad I don’t live anywhere near these people.


37 posted on 09/04/2021 6:01:44 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Agreed. I left another reply to you telling you to disregard my question. I wasn’t thorough in my reading of the excerpt and thought an officer was shot.


38 posted on 09/05/2021 1:52:00 PM PDT by sunny bonobo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; All
The police were prowling in an unmarked white van with the lights off. The idea was to stop riots and people violating curfew.

They had 40mm launchers for rubber bullets. It was dark.

The defendant had a Minnesota carry permit.

The police, unannounced, fired at him from the inside of the moving van when they first saw him, from 70 feet away, hitting him in the lower chest with a rubber bullet.

He returned fire with 3-4 shots all off the pavement. No officer was hit.

They jumped out of the van yelling "Shots fired! Shots fired". He realized they were police, lay down his weapon, and lay down on the pavement, face down hands above his head.

The police approached, then beat on him for about 30 seconds.

The police lied about the incident in their reports.

But the defense was able to obtain all the body camera footage, showing they lied.

The jury did the right thing by acquitting Stalling.

39 posted on 09/06/2021 10:21:58 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

WHAT White Privilege?????!!!!!


40 posted on 09/06/2021 11:32:55 AM PDT by PhineasSpear (PhineasSpear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson