Posted on 09/02/2021 7:16:46 PM PDT by SteveH
why are so many women evolutionarily inclined to be liberal/socialist/communist/fascist?
my observation is that many more women than men seem to fit these categories, which imho differ only in degree.
my own conjecture:
women have been evolved to submit to the force and power of authority. in prehistory, women, having generally less strength and less weight than men, have taken follower social status as the primary way in which both they and their offspring maximize their survival and reproduction chances.
the us constitution upholds minimal government. minimal government is antithetical to maximum force and maximum power.
thus, the us constitution is often belittled as "unimportant" "irrelevant" "wrong" or "patriarchical" by many women.
many ancient cultures apparently implicitly understood this and thus usually did not give women any chance to assume a position of ruling a group.
one of the few ancient cultures that survives is islam. islam does not seem to offer women any leadership roles or any rights equal to those of males. yet, many women support islam, even while asserting feminist ideology.
the evolutionary attraction of women to force and power is the only explanation that i can come up with that resolves the dichotomy of women supporting a culture which denies womens' rights.
by allowing women equal or better political power, therefore, it could be construed as opening the gates of modern civilization to the islamic, socialist, or communist strains of cultural barbarianism.
i am not certain whether a solution exists, but perhaps someone should find a solution quickly, before modern civilization is overrun.
before the 19th amendment passed, the destructive effect of women on modern civilization was not a significant problem.
what am i missing?
> This is a pro-God website, and you are promulgating notions of evolution favored by atheistic communists.
Thanks for your response.
Please do not reply to me any more. Thank you.
> Stopped reading at that.
Stop replying then. Thanks.
Also, I support FR, with money, periodically, at what i believe is a going market rate.
PREACH IT!!!!!!!!
All the men who are blaming the women for the problems in this country today need to take a good, long look in the mirror.
Women did not *take over* in a vacuum. Men abdicated their role as provider and protector in trade for all the free sex they could get and thought it was a pretty good deal. Lots of sex and no responsibility to go with it. What was not to like?
The problem is, men, for all their claims of being logical and not thinking with their emotions, 1) didn’t see the logical result of their actions, and 2) didn’t see their own hypocrisy. They criticize women for thinking with their emotions, when they think with their own hormones.
When men quit being men, women started looking for security elsewhere.
It was inevitable. And when men don’t act like men, it’s easy to conclude they are not necessary. They worked themselves out of a job.
There is also the fact that not all women are liberals and vote liberal, and not all men are conservatives and vote conservative. Show me the women despots like the likes of Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, etc. All men.
It’s easy to blame shift the problems onto someone else and virtue signal how different it would be if they were in charge, but reality is, it’s the corrupt men in positions of political power who are doing the damage.
For what purpose?
I support also, but not to subvert the pro-God stance.
“God help us if we ever give ‘em the vote” - Rooster Cogburn
A shift key.
As opposed to all the great male ones we’ve had, like Johnson, Carter, Bush, obama, biden, schumer, McConnell, Graham, Romney, McCain……
Right?
That is a perfect logical conclusion. Which is what women do not possess. If they did they would see the logical conclusion of their women’s rights war is the ending of civilization. No men to reproduce with. And no children because of abortion. As each of these women die, so does the human race.
Bingo.
> 1. Women are generally stupid and vacuous.
I wish I could be stupid and vacuous. There is probably some law somewhere that forbids men from being stupid and vacuous. Oh yeah... it’s called the law of evolution! Lol
> My sister is a lib Dem and buys a $10 Starbucks coffee every day; mocha and all the goodies. I would never do that.
My self at my most stupid and vacuous always tries to seek out a Peet’s, and if there is only a Starbuck’s, and I cannot for some reason wait, I order the Cafe Americain, and add creamer, chocolate powder, and honey myself at the condiments station. And I pocket the $3 difference.
> 2. Out of necessity, women have had to place their trust in the man who impregnated them, in order to protect their children. He must be as strong and fast as possible; in today’s world, that means connections and power.
Mr. Varsity Quarterback that she only just met at last week’s Alpha Alpha Alpha bash? It sounds so... soo... sooo well thought out...
> Now I have forgotten the original question. Hoping I’m posting on the correct thread! LOL
That’s OK. Did you know that there are 57 states and 44 genders? LOL
get lost, troll. i asked you politely before.
thanks.
LOL!!!
“ Individualism is a concept they reject. Group think is what sustains them.”
—————
Which is proven by bathroom habits - women go in groups, men go it alone.
Got some proof of that claim?
Who knew political affiliation was genetically wired into someone, attached to the X or Y chromosome?
Didn’t anyone ever teach you grammar either?
> A shift key.
Behold... Mr. missing-space key speaks?
Well, howdy back at y’all.
LOL
Too true which gave us 8 years of Bill Clinton who cornered the soccer mom voting bloc.
You and I always tend to agree about everything, even though you're one of those emotional gals. 😃
> Got some proof of that claim?
It’s a conjecture. So you brought up proof first, therefore i leave it up to you to disprove it. Answer your own question. Go for it, ma. LOL
Real men should discourage women from voting then? approve? otherwise we are doomed to get more Clintons, more Bidens, and sooner or later a Heels Up Harris?
Whoever said that God couldn’t have implemented evolution (on the micro level), after having created all of the species (on the macro level)?
They’re hardwired for collectivism and that alone is why they should not vote in a representative republic. Mrs. BCC is one of the millions of exceptions who understand the problems of communism, but generally speaking.
Go ahead and flame me, I don’t care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.