Posted on 09/02/2021 7:16:46 PM PDT by SteveH
> Ergo, women believe that collectivism provides them with the best chance at safety and security. Of course, history teaches us otherwise.
Excess male energy has little culturally acceptable alternative other than to fuel violence (eg XXX) or to become an online gamer cuckold (eg YYY).
(Group identities redacted to prevent any emotional injury to the easily offended reader.)
They love the idea of the government as a provider which is why many women who are married/long term relationship types tend to become conservative if they have a man why do they need the government…single women love to collect government cheese especially if they’re a single mom since they don’t want to blame themselves for their life choices Uncle Sam is there for a shoulder to cry on
> Women are batsh*t crazy.
No they are not. So I am told, they just happen to “get caught up in the moment” while with “bad boys.” Young cis-guys who are not varsity quarterbacks get solid life lessons in how to stay invisible to women at an early age. The varsity quarterbacks perhaps get their own life lessons in the form of alimony payments later on. Either way, it’s the man’s fault. This is because it is never the woman’s fault, no matter what “it” is.
(What am I missing?)
Stopped reading at that.
… evolutionarily inclined …
My wife is a social worker and says that she’s a communist
and I tell her she is certainly the very nicest one I’ve ever met in my life
All the other ones are complete assholes
The VAX crap that she seeing from the liberals is really red pilling
I love it.
So Biden’s really a woman?
Daddy issues.
What you're missing is the basic truth that I already stated: all women are batsh*t crazy. There may be a few exceptions here on FR (emphasis on may be) but eventually they all go batsh*t crazy.
The thing is, while they're all batsh*t crazy, the level of batsh*t crazy varies from woman to woman, and the trick is to find one that's at a level of batsh*t crazy you can actually deal with.
For reference, see the Hot Crazy Matrix
BTW: That's 100% true!
Women operate on emotion. Whatever feels good is right. And what powerful force makes people feel good.
I didn’t make it this way. God did.
Ten bucks per day for a cup of Java? Sheesh, she can go to Tim Horton’s, and spend a whole lot less. Better yet, brew her own, and fill a Thermos for enjoyment throughout the day.
If true, that's the ugliest woman to ever be on TV!
I get the joke but I think that joke is part of the problem.
Women are allowed to be forever juvenile in the West because they are “complicated”.
No, the complication is a ruse to get stuff and get away with never growing up and taking responsibility.
This forever juvenile approach is also why they are suckers for communism. They don’t have to have responsibility if they are not free to make choices.
traditionally in history, barring modern civilized inventions such as the geneva convention, the victors enjoy the spoils of war, eg apparently fertile defeated women, while killing the defeated men.
thus, men derive no evolutionary advantage by allowing the women in their society equal say in group decision making. men who allow women equal say in group decision making may be sealing their own doom if more women than not judge their own army as weaker than the opposing army.
thus, men are evolved to make decisions without excess regard for the feelings... i mean, the reasoning... of women, because women (according to this evolution based conjecture) favor only strong men, and can decide to sacrifice their own men, especially men who are inclined to such forms of government as a constitutional republic, for an enemy army, especially if the army originates from an autocracy.
What am i missing.
This is a pro-God website, and you are promulgating notions of evolution favored by atheistic communists.
if women’s decision making is irrational and/or unreliable, then why blame patriarchy for the portrayal of women as irrational and/or unreliable in the historical record?
in particular, the old testament does this. first is it commonly accepted that the old testament does this?
... ok, thanks for your opinion if you disagree... moving on for brevity on the premise that no reasonable person would disagree...
why does the bible discount the ability of women to lead?
the answer according to my conjecture is that women are (in general) not evolutionarily equipped to lead. they are (in general) evolutionarily equipped to follow.
therefore, according to my conjecture, the bible is not being (arbitrarily) patriarchal in its portrayal of women. it is merely being (a) historically accurate about the past, and (b) realistic about the present and about the future.
what am i missing?
“women’s intuition”. The biggest load of crap foisted on society ever.
,”Feeling” can only get you through the present. It cannot give you a true logical conclusion to anything. Because feelings change. Constantly.
No wonder men want man caves. It’s the logical conclusion to an ever changing atmosphere.
Emotion? That’s not really it. More of a vague perception and fragments of information and preference.
Spent last weekend with 2 of my 20 something nephews.
Both are very masculine, educated, fit, high paying jobs and handsome -good genes.
They were telling me horror stories about todays young women.
Nearly all have numerous sexual partners-way more than men.
When I say nearly all I mean nearly all. No exaggeration.
Lot of conservative parents would be shocked over their daughters real sex life. Probably many here.
Western women especialy American women have gone bat sh*t nuts.
i had a discussion (that is a euphemism) with a woman stranger today. i made myself ready to use the logic card, but she immediately drew and presented the emotion card, basically re-drawing the landscape of the discussion away from rationality and law, and into emotion. it led me to resume consideration of the evolutionary aspects of female behavior as observed in (my) everyday life.
for most of my adult life, i have been an ardent defender of equal rights for women.
the events of the last ten months have challenged my previous inclinations in this regard, if only because i can predict that the end result of allowing a majority of women of questionable rationality to participate in group decisions which affect me may result in my own eventual extinction.
so, presuming i should not advocate for my own eventual extinction, why should i support equal rights for women?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.