traditionally in history, barring modern civilized inventions such as the geneva convention, the victors enjoy the spoils of war, eg apparently fertile defeated women, while killing the defeated men.
thus, men derive no evolutionary advantage by allowing the women in their society equal say in group decision making. men who allow women equal say in group decision making may be sealing their own doom if more women than not judge their own army as weaker than the opposing army.
thus, men are evolved to make decisions without excess regard for the feelings... i mean, the reasoning... of women, because women (according to this evolution based conjecture) favor only strong men, and can decide to sacrifice their own men, especially men who are inclined to such forms of government as a constitutional republic, for an enemy army, especially if the army originates from an autocracy.
What am i missing.
This is a pro-God website, and you are promulgating notions of evolution favored by atheistic communists.