Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Stephen Hawking’s Final Paper Really Means
Pocket ^ | 2021 | Max Genecov

Posted on 08/31/2021 6:54:37 AM PDT by Bogle

"To situate “A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?” in the scientific world in which it was written, the practice of theoretical physics is often an exercise in fabulism: you propose something new and strange that appears to fit with established theory and observations and then — this is the hard part — follow the ever-branching consequences of your new idea to see if there are any contradictions that might arise. After justifying those contradictions, you make or someone else makes a prediction, however outlandish or futuristic, and you wait for the moment between tomorrow and one hundred years from now that it is proved or disproved."

(Excerpt) Read more at getpocket.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Chit/Chat; Science
KEYWORDS: afoolinhisheart; hawking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: gundog

LMAO! It’s all a shell game!


21 posted on 08/31/2021 10:08:52 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gundog

His final paper said: Sheldon was right all along but don’t tell him that!”


22 posted on 08/31/2021 10:44:59 AM PDT by minnesota_bound (I need more money. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
"Stephen Hawking was one of those people."

Stephen Hawking was bitter to the very end about the absence of the NP...
He just needed the patience to stick around for about 500-to-1000 million years (that is about 1,000,000,000 years) when we will know for sure if his namesake radiation is working as postulated...

23 posted on 08/31/2021 10:54:49 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

He was definitely a useful idiot. I don’t believe he was as smart as a lot of people claimed he was.


24 posted on 08/31/2021 1:55:03 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

Heck, he was a brilliant theoretical physicist, I wouldn’t argue that point.

But in the same way that Babe Ruth may have been able to knock a ball out of a stadium but was unqualified to speak about monetary policy during the Depression, I don’t have any expectation that Hawking would have had an opinion on reconditioning a 1957 Chevy that would have been superior to mine...or anyone elses.


25 posted on 08/31/2021 2:27:13 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists are The Droplet of Sewage in a gallon of ultra-pure clean water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: goldbux

* * *


26 posted on 08/31/2021 11:44:20 PM PDT by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. -- Alfred Tarski, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson