Posted on 08/30/2021 9:09:30 AM PDT by chuck allen
“You are not a horse,” the FDA tweeted on Saturday. “You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”
The FDA actually said THAT?
Why not? The giverment does.
Yes, on Twitter last week.
Dear Butler County Common Pleas Judge Gregory Howard,
You have common sense, guts, and determination.
God bless you, Sir.
\/\/ayne.
Damn.
Not a doctor, but as I understand it, 30mg daily would be 2-3 times the recommended dosage. Are they trying to overdose this poor guy, then blame it on the Ivermectin?
Lol! You think courts never get involved in patient care?
What do you think malpractice suits are about?
Smh
“..Does anyone but me find it outrageously hypocritical for the FDA to come out and criticize as dangerous a drug with a fifty-year record of safety for treating humans for parasites, yet doesn’t seem concerned in the slightest about the dangers accompanying a revolutionary new mRNA gene therapy drug that is neither safe nor efficacious....”
Absolutely.
It tells me everything I need to know about em.
They’re either morons or up to something no good.....probably both.
“On the one hand, I am pleased to hear this.
On the other hand, we now have judges telling doctors how they must practice medicine.
In THIS case, I like the direction, but it’s a slippery slope with a whole lot of room for that to go horribly wrong.”
______________________________________
That’s funny. You side with politicized CDC and FDA telling doctors and hospitals how to practice medicine and treat patients, but when a judge intervenes on behalf of the patient, it’s slippery slope.
Just how much more slippery can this slope get?
If this guy recovers and walks out of the hospital, we’ll never hear the story. We’ll only hear the follow up if he dies.
Obviously you can no longer trust all doctors and hospitals anymore. The medical community is taking a big hit on this one. I feel being admitted in to the hospital is a death warrant now.
Hey, I’m not SIDING with anyone.
I’m saying that judges getting involved in deciding medical care issues COULD go badly. But perhaps you don’t see the possibility.
Looks like the CDC and FDA control how medicine is practiced....they control a lot of money going to hospitals...
Too bad he didn't take Ivermectin before COVID hit. Is Ivermectin effective after "several weeks?"
This is not new. Terry Schaivo comes to mind.
That was highly disingenuous of you.
By sophism you changed "right to try" into "Money money money, so no right to try."
If the patient is the one asking for the care, they are not *consenting* to substandard care, e.g. acquiescing to substandard care being urged by others. Because the patient is the driver.
And offering a medicine shown to be efficacious, and recommended by others, e.g. public health higher-ups in Japan, for example; and with a 40+ year track record leading to a Nobel Prize in medicine, is not in and of itself "unprofessional conduct".
The only reasonable caveat, would be to look at how long since the onset of symptoms; OR to administer Ivermectin in CONJUNCTION with, "standard of care" treatments; unless you insist Ivermectin necessarily reacts badly with ventilator tubes and/or whatever the hell that medicine is which chews up the hospitalized patients' kidneys.
But speaking of substandard; in addition to the kidney issues from the standard drug, the ventilators tend to blow the patients lungs out, but nobody making $$$ off the patients seems to mind that a bit.
That’s exactly the case I was thinking of. In the situation today, the judge seems to be helpful and I’m glad that a COVID patient will get the medicine they need. But in Terry Schiavo’s case, the judge stepped in and allowed her to die a bad death. At some point, judges may be serving as death panels or euthanasia boards.
I would like patients and doctors to decide on care. When a judge gets involved, it could go well, it could go poorly, but I would prefer that a three-way conversation not take place at all.
The patient/guardian and Doctor bothe decided on a care treatment, it was the Hospital who overruled the Doc. Then of course the Judge overruled the Hospital giving it back to Dr. and Patient to decide. I see no problem here.
This is clearly legal - The patient is requesting treatment under the ‘Right to Try’ act.
Shocked this hasn’t happened sooner. And the FDA is flat out lying. They even lied in the approval letter for Pfizer. Claimed 91% efficacy in the letter when by August it was below 70% by their own data.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.