Posted on 08/27/2021 2:19:59 PM PDT by janetjanet998
Student dragged out of classroom for not wearing mask in University of Tennessee
Of course you do, vaxbot. Everything is fake. Every doctor, expert, document, and statement that goes against your vax shilling.
Try this on for size. A little more info on your Chinese covid/vax masters:
(excerpt)
A major data leak has revealed how Communist Party of China's members have been employed with some of the world's biggest corporations, in the areas of defence, banking, and even pharma companies involved in manufacturing coronavirus vaccine.
An Australian daily has reported major data leak containing official records, date of birth, national ID number, and ethnicity of nearly two million alleged members of China's Communist Party, working across the world, including US, UK and Australia.
As per the report by The Australian, companies where alleged CPC members are working as employees are COVID-19 vaccine-making companies like-Pfizer and AstraZeneca; financial institutions like ANZ, HSBC, aircraft manufacturer Boeing, and German carmaker Volkswagen.
The leak has exposed details of 1.95 million CPC members after being extracted from a Shanghai server by whistleblowers. The data was extracted from a Shanghai server by Chinese dissidents, whistleblowers, in April 2016, who have been using it for counter-intelligence purposes.
Of course, this article is probly fake too, right?
Here's the thing, sheep boy. The information is out there at your fingertips. All you got to do is look for it and put it together.
You bad mouthing the current vaccines is without justification.
The evidence that the vax is poison is mounting and insurmountable. Stick your head in the sand and saying the evidence doesn't exist is a strategy, but not a good one.
The approval of the Pfizer vaccine by the FDA is verification of its safety and effectiveness.
Hahahahaha. Woo, boy. THAT'S a good one. Your best whopper yet.
The stack of paperwork involved in its documentation (300,000 pages) would reach 100 feet.
Okay. So truth is determined by how high the paper stacks. Good to know.
The moral of the story is this:
You are a Nazi agent of the heathen Chinee.
You are dangerous to a free people. uberfuerher.
If I say you have to wear a pink tutu to be on my property, and you fail to do so, as the property owner, I can trespass you. *PERIOD* full stop.
You do not have the right to be on my property. I grant permission for you to be there and if I want to put restrictions on that permission, I can.
It’s getting hard to tell the difference between a spell check error and a Freudian slip.
Correct. I do. You have to be retarded to buy into the derp state/Chinese covid/vax hoax. There can be no other explanation. Vaxtard.
That term is used to call us bastards.
No. I never once called you a bastard. You know who your daddy is. Right? Right???
We know your tactics.
No, you really don't. You're not smart enough. Also who is 'we'. You got a Chinese mouse in your pocket?
If the guy ripped a silent stinker how would anyone in a room full of masks know?
Oh wait....
Exactly.
At this point it is getting there. Good football technique. Get under the center of gravity and keep pushing.
Good for you!
Since when is a PUBLIC university or classroom PRIVATE property. The kid paid 'rent' and taxes to be there and he is a member of the PUBLIC. Its HIS property.
You are a mixed up, mumbled up, shook up vaxtard and your screen name is ironical.
‘You do not have the right to be on my property.’
curious; if you’re equating being on your property to this individual being on campus, you left out the part about him paying the university, and the university’s acceptance of his money, as the binding contract that it is (offer and acceptance of offer, you remember Business Law 101, I’m sure)...
you have not offered me the opportunity to wear a tutu of any hue on your property, nor have I paid you for that nonexistant offer, so you can run me off with all legality, as the law against trespass dictates; what you are conflating with illegal trespass is a moral decision not to abide by an illogical and arbitrary rule set up by people with no understanding of the rules they are enforcing, and who in fact are committing breach of contract by so doing...
unless of course you are suggesting the student is committing some sort of crime, thus negating the contract, by refusing to wear a mask...?
Excellent point.
Case dismissed.
CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a press briefing that the change in masking guidelines was due to new evidence indicating that in cases where fully vaccinated individuals become infected with the more contagious delta variant of the COVID-19 virus, they could transmit the virus to others.
Walensky did say that the vaccinated and unvaccinated may have “similarly high” viral loads when infected with the delta variant, suggesting an increased risk of transmission compared to earlier variants of the COVID-19 virus. Vaccinated individuals continue to represent a very small amount of transmission occurring around the country. We continue to estimate that the risk of a breakthrough infection with symptoms upon exposure to the delta variant is reduced by seven-fold. The reduction is 20-fold for hospitalizations and deaths.”
This situation poses a necessity for the unvaccinated.
If you wear a mask and another person wears a mask, you have both masks of protection. That is just what is needed with this more contagious Delta Variant sweeping the U.S. Even if you have a 98% chance of recovery, if you are unvaccinated, you will more than likely require hospitalization. Who will pay for your hospital bill? Who will pay for the hospital bills for those you infected because you didn’t wear a mask? If you are that 2%, who will pay for the funeral? If you think those are stupid, trivial, questions, give me some of your $75,000 it took for a stay in the ICU.
Yes, the crime of trespass.
Either by signage or by verbal request, when you are asked to leave a property, you are being trespassed. At that point, the mask is irrelevant other than the required condition to remain on the property.
When you escalate by non-compliance with that request, LEO comes to enforce the trespass. If you do not leave when LEO tells you to, it then becomes a criminal act.
Had the student complied with the requirements to remain on the property - put on a mask, he could not have been trespassed for that. If he had left when asked, no crime committed as almost every jurisdiction requires that the person be allowed to comply with the trespass request. It was when after given notice of trespass and then REFUSAL to comply with the property owners requirements, a crime was committed.
Most states have a formal criminal trespass law. The laws of Tennessee (code 39-14-405) define criminal trespass as ... (a) A person commits criminal trespass if the person enters or remains on property, or any portion of property, without the consent of the owner.
Now with specific regard to the “student contract”. EVERY SINGLE UNIVERSITY that I have attended requires students to abide by the schools code of conduct.
Here is the link to UT’s code of conduct page:
https://studentconduct.utk.edu/
On the first page, you will find their Covid Guidelines
Ahahahahaha. That's your second biggest whopper. I'm losing track.
#YouSoundLikeASmallChild
Incorrect but more importantly, irrelevant. What is relevant is that the classrooms are not public use. They are for the faculty and for students and any other authorized person the University grants access.
Public property does not equal public access. The county jail is owned by the government (county i.e. public) but is not open (access) to the public. Same with the court house, the national guard armory, etc. The law allows property owners including the government to restrict access to that property. Even city parks (public property with public access) can be restricted and often are restricted in their use.
And you are confused - I do not support the vax mandate, in fact, I am not going to take the covid-19 clot shot due to a medical issue. So slow your roll on the assumptions please.
The kid paid for his right to be on the property and in that classroom.
It cannot cannot be revoked for not wearing a mask or chewing bubble gum in class. Or cutting cheese.
You need to stop overthinking things.
...as the property owner...
_________________________________
Is UT a private university?

Here in Illinoiastan they treat our unvaxinated students like criminals under SURVEILLANCE.
The audacity of using such a term is infuriating.
No one seems to care that college administrators are dehumanizing our young adults.
Here is a number you can call to let them know what you think
815-753-1681
7
And public property (University of Tenn) has the right to and does, restrict access to their property, just like the Jail or court house. One of those restrictions is to wear a mask. Since the student agreed to the code of conduct, he agreed to those restrictions as part of his continuing to be a student. This is really no different that if City Hall required masks for entrance into the building.
The kid paid for his right to be on the property and in that classroom.
Not if he does not abide by the rules of the school (property owner) which is part of the code of conduct and applies to all students, faculty and staff.
It cannot cannot be revoked for not wearing a mask or chewing bubble gum in class. Or cutting cheese.
Sorry you are incorrect. They can place any restrictions that they want on accessing their property (within the law - i.e. there are legal allowances for LEO, serving papers, etc.). Further, since schools will not accept you as a student UNTIL you agree to be bound by the code of conduct, he has specifically waived any such contractual claim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.