You are only proving my long held contention that lawyers are a species of slime mold.
I was quoting the CDC guidance itself on what they consider (”Because SCIENCE™!”) to be disqualifying medical conditions to the jab. There are virtually none: even cancer, bone marrow transplant, and autoimmune diseases are listed as reasons to get BOOSTER shots.
So go ahead and try your method. HR will laugh in your face and smear you as a “science denier.”
The only lawful way to do it for now is to organize about 40% of the staff to walk out and quit.
It doesn’t matter what the CDC says.
The ADA controls. Medical accommodation is much broader than what the CDC guidelines say and there is a mountain of case law backing that up.
Then there are religious exemptions under Title VII.
However, all of that is irrelevant if we pass Statutes like HB702.
“ Section 1. Discrimination based on vaccination status or possession of immunity passport prohibited — definitions.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for:
(a) a person or a governmental entity to refuse, withhold from, or deny to a person any local or state services, goods, facilities, advantages, privileges, licensing, educational opportunities, health care access, or employment opportunities based on the person’s vaccination status or whether the person has an immunity
passport;
(b) an employer to refuse employment to a person, to bar a person from employment, or to discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment based on the person’s vaccination status or whether the person has an immunity passport; or
(c) a public accommodation to exclude, limit, segregate, refuse to serve, or otherwise discriminate against a person based on the person’s vaccination status or whether the person has an immunity passport.”