Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bakuage Offers Prize of 120 Million JPY to Whoever Solves Collatz Conjecture, Math Problem Unsolved for 84 Years
prnewswire. com ^ | 7/7/2021 | Staff

Posted on 08/26/2021 4:17:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker

NEWS PROVIDED BY

Bakuage Co., Ltd. Jul 07, 2021, 03:00 ET

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

TOKYO, July 7, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --

- Highest Prize for Any Unsolved Problem in Mathematics -

Bakuage Co., Ltd. headquartered in Shibuya, Tokyo, announced on July 7, 2021, that it is offering a prize of 120 million Japanese yen (*) to anyone who has revealed the truth of the Collatz conjecture, an unsolved mathematical problem.

(*) 120 million Japanese yen is about US$1,085,000 (1US$=JPY110.50 as of June 29, 2021).

Image: https://kyodonewsprwire.jp/prwfile/release/M106706/202106236656/_prw_PI1fl_dI1163aV.png

- What is Collatz conjecture?

The Collatz conjecture is one of unsolved problems in mathematics. It is a conjecture that repeatedly applying the following sequences will eventually result in 1: starting with any positive integer, divide it by 2 in the case of an even number and multiply it by 3 and add 1 in the case of any odd number. The conjecture is named after Lothar Collatz, who introduced the idea in 1937. Since then, it has remained unsolved with its truth not yet verified.

Background of prize

Prize money is sometimes offered on an unsolved problem in mathematics. For example, a prize of $1 million was posted for the solution to each of seven unsolved millennium problems announced by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. Bakuage decided on the latest prize, hoping to contribute to the development of mathematics. The company has chosen the Collatz conjecture because it thought many people can be easily interested in the problem, which itself is easy to understand.

Prize rules

A prize of 120 million Japanese yen will be paid to whoever has elucidated the truth of the Collatz conjecture. For details, please visit the following prize site. Prize site: https://mathprize.net/posts/collatz-conjecture/

Other notes

*Corporate and product names contained here are their respective trademarks or registered trademarks.

*If the contents of this press release and the abovementioned prize rules do not agree with each other, the prize rules mentioned on the prize site shall take precedence.

URL: https://bakuage.com/en/about

SOURCE Bakuage Co., Ltd.

Related Links https://bakuage.com/en/about


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: collatz; conjecture; math; prize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: LibWhacker
Since then, it has remained unsolved with its truth not yet verified.

I suspect there is no answer and there is no unsolved problem.

So who actually has the answer or is there really an answer?

21 posted on 08/26/2021 5:07:23 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Without potatoes, life has no meaning......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

the answer is 42.

where’s my $$$?


22 posted on 08/26/2021 5:10:23 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (Politicians are not born, they are excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

flr


23 posted on 08/26/2021 5:10:23 PM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Find a black person and declare they solved it.

Anyone who objects is a racist.

I win!


24 posted on 08/26/2021 5:11:24 PM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
One of the comments

"This must be the formula that banks use, to calculate fees, that reduce my account to 1."
LOL

25 posted on 08/26/2021 5:13:11 PM PDT by NachOsten (Only a Fool believes there is no hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The answer is Wm. Wm is equal too or greater than negative infinity.

I will take my money please.


26 posted on 08/26/2021 5:15:18 PM PDT by GunHoardingCapitalist (If square had a flavor, what would it be? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
For odd, multiply it by 3 and add 1.

Here is the graphic that didn't come through on the posted article:

-PJ

27 posted on 08/26/2021 5:15:33 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
More here:

The Simplest Math Problem No One Can Solve - Collatz Conjecture

28 posted on 08/26/2021 5:15:56 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I don't understand why it's necessary to multiply odd numbers by three before adding the one to make it even.

By simply adding a one every time you divide by half to get an odd number, you will get down to the number 1 all the faster.

29 posted on 08/26/2021 5:22:11 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Give me a Pigfoot and a Bottle of Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Then you go back and read what it says, and compare to what you wrote. :)


30 posted on 08/26/2021 5:24:13 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I would, but I’m busy solving the Riemann Hypothesis.


31 posted on 08/26/2021 5:28:18 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I don't understand why it's necessary to multiply odd numbers by three before adding the one to make it even.

I can only speculate that Collatz himself knew it was true, or proved it was true, in that case.

But when he looked at multiplying by three, he couldn't prove it.

32 posted on 08/26/2021 5:31:49 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
So who actually has the answer or is there really an answer?

A proof would provide the answer. That's what all these number theorists have been working on for the last eighty years.

33 posted on 08/26/2021 5:37:44 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Any even number can by divided by 2 repeatedly until one gets a a 1 (2/2). Multiplying an odd number by an odd number gives you an (wait for it) odd number! Adding one to an odd number makes it an even number.


34 posted on 08/26/2021 5:39:10 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The path to the answer seems obvious to me.

Once an even number that is a power of 2 is reached, it will divide down to 1.

So the question is whether or not there is an odd number that will never iterate to a power of 2?

Did I win?

-PJ

35 posted on 08/26/2021 5:42:13 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Try using Proof By Induction.


36 posted on 08/26/2021 5:53:17 PM PDT by takebackaustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Any even number can by divided by 2 repeatedly until one gets a a 1 (2/2).

What about 6? 10? 14? 18?
37 posted on 08/26/2021 5:53:34 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Interesting.

Seems similar to chess - although it appears there is some kind of ultimate “solution, there is none apparent, because a smarter chess player (a computer) can always beat the less smart chess player (a less smart computer) - ad infinitum.


38 posted on 08/26/2021 5:54:24 PM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1FreeAmerican
But I still don’t get what the issue is here.

You will always end up at 1 because of math, and it is true because it’s math.


But will you actually? That's the point - we're pretty sure that is correct, but there isn't an actual proof that proves that it's correct. Just because a bunch of big numbers follow the pattern, doesn't mean the pattern is always going to be correct. It just looks like it will be.
39 posted on 08/26/2021 5:55:53 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dan Cooper

OK, that makes more sense.

Thanks.


40 posted on 08/26/2021 5:59:33 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson