Posted on 08/25/2021 5:30:11 AM PDT by MtnClimber
It’s a corporate takeover of global governance that affects our food, our data and our vaccines.
The Great Reset’ conspiracy theories don’t seem to want to die. The theories were triggered by the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) summit last year, which had the theme ‘The Great Reset’ and argued that the COVID crisis was an opportunity to address the burning issues facing the world. According to the BBC, the term ‘Great Reset’ has received more than eight million interactions on Facebook and has been shared almost two million times on Twitter since the WEF initiative was launched.
The set of conspiracy theories around the Great Reset are nebulous and hard to pin down, but piecing them together gives us something like this: the Great Reset is the global elite’s plan to instate a communist world order by abolishing private property while using COVID-19 to solve overpopulation and enslaving what remains of humanity with vaccines.
Intrigued by the palaver around last year’s summit, I decided to find out what the WEF’s Great Reset plan was really about. At the heart of conspiracy theories are supposed secret agendas and malicious intent. While these may be absent from the WEF's Great Reset initiative, what I found was something almost as sinister hiding in plain sight. In fact, more sinister because it’s real and it’s happening now. And it involves things as fundamental as our food, our data and our vaccines.
The real Great Reset The magic words are ‘stakeholder capitalism’, a concept that WEF chairman Klaus Schwab has been hammering for decades and which occupies pride of place in the WEF’s Great Reset plan from June 2020. The idea is that global capitalism should be transformed so that corporations no longer focus solely on serving shareholders but become custodians of society by creating value for customers, suppliers, employees, communities and other ‘stakeholders’. The way the WEF sees stakeholder capitalism being carried out is through a range of ‘multi-stakeholder partnerships’ bringing together the private sector, governments and civil society across all areas of global governance.
The idea of stakeholder capitalism and multi-stakeholder partnerships might sound warm and fuzzy, until we dig deeper and realise that this actually means giving corporations more power over society, and democratic institutions less.
When they are losing leftists they are in bad shape.
The Great Reset is fascism, not communism. That comes later, after total control has been consolidated.
Make no mistake, Oligarchs are working with fascists and communists to control on a globalist scale. We are (now) consumers and workers for their greater food however they will transition us into subjects for their subservient wants, needs and twisted lies. Make no mistake the oligarchs are using the fascists and vice-Versa to have us as their “subservient subjects” or slaves.
Greater good not food..^^^
I have always thought leftists were nothing but children in adult skin.
Now, here is the dilemma facing the “children”...
Big business... Bad
Big government... Good
Big business controlling big government??!!??
They may be just starting to figure it out
Communist buzzwords.
We’re already seeing this beginning with Big Tech working hand-in-glove with the elites to create authoritarian censorship which only allows progressive thoughts and speech. Social media platforms are just short of implementing a “Report Wrong Think” button.
It’s best to be prepared in all ways including spiritually. We may be facing a time of Biblical tribulation.
“The Great Reset is fascism, not communism. That comes later, after total control has been consolidated.”
~~~
Totalitarianism is the real endgame. They just wont call it that. Communism is considered more of an economic system (versus capitalism for example), but it’s obviously very political and much more useful than capitalism because it abolishes private property. Capitalism may still allow for democratic or representative type governments, and those don’t allow for their greater consolidation of power.
So yes, communism is an a means, but it is not the end. It just helps to take power and property away from all the little people, and that’s it’s allure, even though it is always touted as being for the little guy, or the worker. These people can accumulate all the wealth they want in a capitalist society, and after they reach a certain critical mass can keep using the wealth to grow and expand their wealth, as well as collude (think of how the silicon valley elites get together), and will all the immense power that provides them, it is still not enough because there are those pesky government bureaucrats and politicians that they have to keep buying off. They really need these obstacles out of the the way
“The way the WEF sees stakeholder capitalism being carried out is through a range of ‘multi-stakeholder partnerships’ bringing together the private sector, governments and civil society across all areas of global governance.”
The author doesn’t know enough history to realize this is the textbook definition of fascism.
Skip Germany and the Nazis (which were an aberration) and study Italy and Mussolini. That’s where you’ll find the real foundation for what they are trying to implement today.
Mussolini was already politically involved in 1900—30 years before the Nazis came to power. He took power and implemented his “fascist” vision over a decade before the Nazis.
He was close to Lenin. They worked together on a political newspaper, where together the would develop much of the ideas that would become communism & fascism. Lenin admired him and worked hard to recruit Mussolini to communism, but Mussolini had another vision.
Mussolini coined the word “fascism”. Italian for a “bundle of rods”, it represents the combining of the private sector (business), the government, and civil society into a single unit. All focused on the same goal; no dissent allowed.
Notice the similarity to the author’s “Great Reset” description?
Of course, none of this works without a strong leader at the top setting the vision, and suppression of dissent. The support of the vision is the primary concern.
BTW, most mega-churches today are following this same fascist model. A strong, visionary leader. All parts of the church are organized to promote that vision. Questioning of the vision is not allowed.
If you want to see what life would be like under the great reset, visit a mega-church with a visionary pastor. It’s a pretty good life, till you step out of line or disagree with any part of the vision, then it can become very uncomfortable.
But remember, churches don’t have the option of using force to compel compliance with their vision—governments do.
Big business controlling big government
Or
Big government controlling Big business
It’s one in the same
You are the subject.. they are the master
For those of you who know any liberals, pass this on to them. While I personally don't, I know people who are friends, or even have family, that are big time liberals, so I passed it on to them.
We might even become their food at some point in time.
They are too stupid to understand that they ALREADY EXIST because they create value for their customers.
No, just assisting them at this point because of promises made to them. In time, the government will control the big businesses.
Sounds like simple fascism to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.