Posted on 08/15/2021 10:37:42 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
Did the materials released by Mike Lindell at his Cyber Symposium meet evidentiary standards of relevance, proof of origin, chain-of-secure-custody and reproducibility that online security experts say would be needed to take seriously his claim that he holds massive data files showing the 2020 election was stolen by hackers? No, that's not true. Lead Stories asked for the information necessary to authenticate his evidence two weeks in advance of the symposium and was rebuffed, and the materials released August 10, 11 and 12, 2021, were more of what Lindell showed before the gathering: videos showing computer code of unauthenticated origin scrolling in a continuous loop.
During the weeks leading up to the Cyber Symposium, Lead Stories staff talked to Lindell, his anonymous designated spokesperson and national election security and cybersecurity experts to double-check what would be needed to verify that Lindell has what he claims he has. We boiled it down to nine questions.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at leadstories.com ...
“Mike is doing everything he can to try to save this nation. We need to all pull in the same direction.”
Absolutely. The ones who disparage him are like the ones who disparaged Trump because of his style. There’s little doubt that something else was going on behind the scenes at the Symposium to sabotage the effort. You could “feel” it, and see the looks on people’s faces.
That’s exactly right. In 2016 they thought they had cheated enough to bring in a “win” for Hillary. They didn’t.
So in 2020 they doubled their cheating efforts - and it still wasn’t enough. Stop counting. Fabricate ballots. Restart the counting. Run those ballots through counting machines multiple times.
“if they think it will overturn an election that they didn’t like.”
Apparently you believe Biden won “fair and square”.
Nope. But I'm not stupid enough to think it'll get overturned, returning Trump to the White House.
Then don’t interfere with those who are at least trying.
Just surrender, if you are going to give up.
Then don’t interfere with those who are at least trying.
Just surrender, if you are going to give up.
Do you believe rep. Dan Crenshaw when he says, unequivocally, that there was no election fraud? That Biden won the election.
From what is that base that upon? The only thing I can think of, is that it's nothing more than his personal opinion.
He has no way of knowing how many illegal voters, to include but not limited to: dead people voting, under-aged people voting, non citizens voting, citizens who have lost their privilege to vote, people who did not vote, yet have been recorded as voting, people voting in more than one state, or voting in a district that is not the district they live in.
The answer is, there is no way Dan Crenshaw can know unequivocally that Biden won, or that Trump lost. Without full forensic audits to confirm, what is at this point nothing more than his opinion, can he prove or disprove his opinion in a court of law. But he never even calls for a 50 state forensic audit, does hhe.
While I trust Mike Lindell, I don't know if I can trust the source that provided him with these pacaps. So, while I believe Mike Lindell believes he was given something of real value, I cannot know if the pcaps are legit or bogus, without knowing the source. The fact that he was alerted as to the pcaps containing poison pill data, makes me unsure of the source that supplied them, but not Mike Lindell at all. Because of that, even Mike Lindell decided to pull back. So perhaps he started to smell a rat also.
But in no way do I fault Mike Lindell. I fault the source at this point in time. Then again, it may be neither at fault, and the tip-off was a ruse to cast doubt and stop him cold. In turn allowing the attack dogs to disparage his good name. This is a time tested and effective communist tactic they use when the heat is getting to hot. Disparage your attacker.
The enemies who were involved in what sure seems like a stolen election, to me is rises to 99% at the very least in my opinion. That belief is the thousands upon thousands of sworn depositions, the mathematical impossibilities that surrounds all kinds of well-known, and timed tested probability calculations, and the anomalies even a novice like myself witnessed, that have never been satisfactorily explained. Indeed, they were all totally ignored..
If President Trump had been declared the winner, and Democrats questioned the legitimacy of the election, Trump himself would have called for a full forensic audit.
You see, what my real problem with those who spoke negatively about the symposium, and were attempting to smear Mike Lindell as some sort of swindler. Mike Lindell is a true patiot that loves the Lord, and also loves this nation. He spent millions on what he believed were real. For now the pcaps remain unsolved as to their validity. Mike Lindell will continue to investigate these pcaps, and if he can come to a bullet-proof validation one way or the other, he will inform us what he has found, or not found. He has spent millions, so that right there negates the swindler allegations.
The problem I have with what you put forward is you can’t trust any election….even a one vote election without a forensic audit, that may turn out empty with evidence but still not accepted.
In addition I have noticed over the years Trump has never acknowledged defeat or loss. Remember the primaries and caucuses that he didn’t win in 2016 were rigged as well as Hillary getting more votes than he did. His business failings weren’t due to him ver leverage or other shortcomings but he xterm all factors rigged against him. It the same old song and in every example he’s never provided proof but just claims it. But think about this. Statistically, no one can win at everything, yet if you examine history, that’s Trump’s claim.
I’ve been suspicious of Lindell’s China claim because he said the evidence was obtained through the Chinese via intermediaries. Why would China be the source since according to the narrative they want Biden in office.
This is a guess, but Arizona won’t produce conclusive evidence of fraud significant enough to overturn the election, yet the results will be missed send to muddy the water and kick up dust enough so to further seed distrust. Finding evidence seems to be in less demand than seeding mistrust.
Yeah, by people like yourself.
So you are a Never-Trupmer after all. I knew it. Thanks for playing.
What other fairy tales do you believe? That Biden received more votes Obama, while simultaneously receiving less of the black & Hispanic vote?
I support Trump when he gets it right and call it out when he doesn’t. Remember, statistically he can’t be right all the time.
I bet you are something at the race tracks, and casinos too.
Race tracks? Sure. Casinos. House always had the advantage.
Race Tracks, can be a sure thing, when you know the fix that is in play. Otherwise, on any given day a horse may run beyond its previous showings.
My wife was best friends with Carlos Marcello's daughter. She had first hand knowledge of what happens at race tracks.
Casinos. House always had the advantage.
Yet there are people who know how to consistently win in honest casinos. A lot depends on the games you choose to play.
Has Trump been re-instated yet? I hear this is the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.